Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease

Jeffrey F. Peipert, Roberta B. Ness, Jeffrey Blume, David E. Soper, Robert Holley, Hugh Randall, Richard L Sweet, Steven J. Sondheimer, Susan L. Hendrix, Antonio Amortegui, Giuliana Trucco, Debra C. Bass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Careful detection and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease are essential for the prevention of adverse sequelae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline characteristics of 651 patients enrolled in a multicenter randomized treatment trial for pelvic inflammatory disease. Clinical and laboratory findings were recorded for all patients, and endometrial sampling was performed. We calculated sensitivity and specificity and performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression, using histologic endometritis as the criterion standard. RESULTS: The minimal criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, had a sensitivity of 83%, in comparison with a 95% sensitivity for adnexal tenderness (P = .001). Of the supportive clinical criteria, the finding most highly associated with endometritis was a positive test result for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (adjusted odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.89-6.63). A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that combinations of criteria significantly improve the prediction of endometritis. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity can be maximized by using the presence of adnexal tenderness as a minimal criterion for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, and supportive criteria are helpful in estimating the probability of endometritis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)856-864
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume184
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endometritis
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Signs and Symptoms
Logistic Models
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Chlamydia trachomatis
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Routine Diagnostic Tests
ROC Curve
Multivariate Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Adnexitis
  • Diagnosis
  • Endometritis
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Salpingitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Peipert, J. F., Ness, R. B., Blume, J., Soper, D. E., Holley, R., Randall, H., ... Bass, D. C. (2001). Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 184(5), 856-864. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.113847

Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease. / Peipert, Jeffrey F.; Ness, Roberta B.; Blume, Jeffrey; Soper, David E.; Holley, Robert; Randall, Hugh; Sweet, Richard L; Sondheimer, Steven J.; Hendrix, Susan L.; Amortegui, Antonio; Trucco, Giuliana; Bass, Debra C.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 184, No. 5, 2001, p. 856-864.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peipert, JF, Ness, RB, Blume, J, Soper, DE, Holley, R, Randall, H, Sweet, RL, Sondheimer, SJ, Hendrix, SL, Amortegui, A, Trucco, G & Bass, DC 2001, 'Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 856-864. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.113847
Peipert, Jeffrey F. ; Ness, Roberta B. ; Blume, Jeffrey ; Soper, David E. ; Holley, Robert ; Randall, Hugh ; Sweet, Richard L ; Sondheimer, Steven J. ; Hendrix, Susan L. ; Amortegui, Antonio ; Trucco, Giuliana ; Bass, Debra C. / Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001 ; Vol. 184, No. 5. pp. 856-864.
@article{594a5842ec894c7ca00e8334371458c3,
title = "Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Careful detection and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease are essential for the prevention of adverse sequelae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline characteristics of 651 patients enrolled in a multicenter randomized treatment trial for pelvic inflammatory disease. Clinical and laboratory findings were recorded for all patients, and endometrial sampling was performed. We calculated sensitivity and specificity and performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression, using histologic endometritis as the criterion standard. RESULTS: The minimal criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, had a sensitivity of 83{\%}, in comparison with a 95{\%} sensitivity for adnexal tenderness (P = .001). Of the supportive clinical criteria, the finding most highly associated with endometritis was a positive test result for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (adjusted odds ratio, 4.3; 95{\%} confidence interval, 2.89-6.63). A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that combinations of criteria significantly improve the prediction of endometritis. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity can be maximized by using the presence of adnexal tenderness as a minimal criterion for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, and supportive criteria are helpful in estimating the probability of endometritis.",
keywords = "Adnexitis, Diagnosis, Endometritis, Pelvic inflammatory disease, Salpingitis",
author = "Peipert, {Jeffrey F.} and Ness, {Roberta B.} and Jeffrey Blume and Soper, {David E.} and Robert Holley and Hugh Randall and Sweet, {Richard L} and Sondheimer, {Steven J.} and Hendrix, {Susan L.} and Antonio Amortegui and Giuliana Trucco and Bass, {Debra C.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1067/mob.2001.113847",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "184",
pages = "856--864",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease

AU - Peipert, Jeffrey F.

AU - Ness, Roberta B.

AU - Blume, Jeffrey

AU - Soper, David E.

AU - Holley, Robert

AU - Randall, Hugh

AU - Sweet, Richard L

AU - Sondheimer, Steven J.

AU - Hendrix, Susan L.

AU - Amortegui, Antonio

AU - Trucco, Giuliana

AU - Bass, Debra C.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Careful detection and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease are essential for the prevention of adverse sequelae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline characteristics of 651 patients enrolled in a multicenter randomized treatment trial for pelvic inflammatory disease. Clinical and laboratory findings were recorded for all patients, and endometrial sampling was performed. We calculated sensitivity and specificity and performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression, using histologic endometritis as the criterion standard. RESULTS: The minimal criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, had a sensitivity of 83%, in comparison with a 95% sensitivity for adnexal tenderness (P = .001). Of the supportive clinical criteria, the finding most highly associated with endometritis was a positive test result for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (adjusted odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.89-6.63). A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that combinations of criteria significantly improve the prediction of endometritis. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity can be maximized by using the presence of adnexal tenderness as a minimal criterion for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, and supportive criteria are helpful in estimating the probability of endometritis.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Careful detection and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease are essential for the prevention of adverse sequelae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline characteristics of 651 patients enrolled in a multicenter randomized treatment trial for pelvic inflammatory disease. Clinical and laboratory findings were recorded for all patients, and endometrial sampling was performed. We calculated sensitivity and specificity and performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate logistic regression, using histologic endometritis as the criterion standard. RESULTS: The minimal criteria for pelvic inflammatory disease, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, had a sensitivity of 83%, in comparison with a 95% sensitivity for adnexal tenderness (P = .001). Of the supportive clinical criteria, the finding most highly associated with endometritis was a positive test result for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae (adjusted odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.89-6.63). A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that combinations of criteria significantly improve the prediction of endometritis. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity can be maximized by using the presence of adnexal tenderness as a minimal criterion for the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease, and supportive criteria are helpful in estimating the probability of endometritis.

KW - Adnexitis

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Endometritis

KW - Pelvic inflammatory disease

KW - Salpingitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035056328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035056328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mob.2001.113847

DO - 10.1067/mob.2001.113847

M3 - Article

VL - 184

SP - 856

EP - 864

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -