Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors

Michael B. Liu, Neville C W Eclov, Nicholas Trakul, James Murphy, Maximilian Diehn, Quynh Thu Le, Sonja Dieterich, Peter G. Maxim, Billy W. Loo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the clinical impact of calculated dose differences between effective path length (EPL) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung tumors. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment plans and clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients treated with SABR for 82 lung tumors between 2003 and 2009 at our institution. Sixty treatments were originally planned using EPL, and 22 using MC. All plans were recalculated for the same beam specifications using MC and EPL, respectively. The doses covering 95%, 50%, and 5% (D95, D50, D5, respectively) of the target volumes were compared between EPL and MC (assumed to be the actual delivered dose), both as physical dose and biologically effective dose. Time to local recurrence was correlated with dose by Cox regression analysis. The relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biologically effective dose was determined via logistic regression and used to estimate the TCP decrements due to prescribing by EPL calculations. Results: EPL overestimated dose compared with MC in all tumor dose-volume histogram parameters in all plans. The difference was >10% of the MC D95 to the planning target volume and gross tumor volume in 60 of 82 (73%) and 52 of 82 plans (63%), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 of 82 tumors. Controlling for gross tumor volume, higher physical and biologically effective planning target volume D95 correlated significantly with local control (P = .007 and P = .045, respectively). Compared with MC, prescribing based on EPL translated to a median TCP decrement of 4.3% (range, 1.2%-37%) and a >. 5% decrement in 46% of tumors. Conclusions: Clinical follow-up for local lung tumor control in a sizable cohort of patients treated with SABR demonstrates that EPL overestimates dose by amounts that substantially decrease TCP in a large proportion. EPL algorithms should be avoided for lung tumor SABR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-300
Number of pages7
JournalPractical Radiation Oncology
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Lung
Neoplasms
Tumor Burden
Recurrence
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors. / Liu, Michael B.; Eclov, Neville C W; Trakul, Nicholas; Murphy, James; Diehn, Maximilian; Le, Quynh Thu; Dieterich, Sonja; Maxim, Peter G.; Loo, Billy W.

In: Practical Radiation Oncology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 294-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liu, Michael B. ; Eclov, Neville C W ; Trakul, Nicholas ; Murphy, James ; Diehn, Maximilian ; Le, Quynh Thu ; Dieterich, Sonja ; Maxim, Peter G. ; Loo, Billy W. / Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors. In: Practical Radiation Oncology. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 294-300.
@article{4589c1090fdc4d74a9097ceea37d8ad6,
title = "Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the clinical impact of calculated dose differences between effective path length (EPL) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung tumors. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment plans and clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients treated with SABR for 82 lung tumors between 2003 and 2009 at our institution. Sixty treatments were originally planned using EPL, and 22 using MC. All plans were recalculated for the same beam specifications using MC and EPL, respectively. The doses covering 95{\%}, 50{\%}, and 5{\%} (D95, D50, D5, respectively) of the target volumes were compared between EPL and MC (assumed to be the actual delivered dose), both as physical dose and biologically effective dose. Time to local recurrence was correlated with dose by Cox regression analysis. The relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biologically effective dose was determined via logistic regression and used to estimate the TCP decrements due to prescribing by EPL calculations. Results: EPL overestimated dose compared with MC in all tumor dose-volume histogram parameters in all plans. The difference was >10{\%} of the MC D95 to the planning target volume and gross tumor volume in 60 of 82 (73{\%}) and 52 of 82 plans (63{\%}), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 of 82 tumors. Controlling for gross tumor volume, higher physical and biologically effective planning target volume D95 correlated significantly with local control (P = .007 and P = .045, respectively). Compared with MC, prescribing based on EPL translated to a median TCP decrement of 4.3{\%} (range, 1.2{\%}-37{\%}) and a >. 5{\%} decrement in 46{\%} of tumors. Conclusions: Clinical follow-up for local lung tumor control in a sizable cohort of patients treated with SABR demonstrates that EPL overestimates dose by amounts that substantially decrease TCP in a large proportion. EPL algorithms should be avoided for lung tumor SABR.",
author = "Liu, {Michael B.} and Eclov, {Neville C W} and Nicholas Trakul and James Murphy and Maximilian Diehn and Le, {Quynh Thu} and Sonja Dieterich and Maxim, {Peter G.} and Loo, {Billy W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "294--300",
journal = "Practical Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1879-8500",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical impact of dose overestimation by effective path length calculation in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy of lung tumors

AU - Liu, Michael B.

AU - Eclov, Neville C W

AU - Trakul, Nicholas

AU - Murphy, James

AU - Diehn, Maximilian

AU - Le, Quynh Thu

AU - Dieterich, Sonja

AU - Maxim, Peter G.

AU - Loo, Billy W.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Purpose: To determine the clinical impact of calculated dose differences between effective path length (EPL) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung tumors. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment plans and clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients treated with SABR for 82 lung tumors between 2003 and 2009 at our institution. Sixty treatments were originally planned using EPL, and 22 using MC. All plans were recalculated for the same beam specifications using MC and EPL, respectively. The doses covering 95%, 50%, and 5% (D95, D50, D5, respectively) of the target volumes were compared between EPL and MC (assumed to be the actual delivered dose), both as physical dose and biologically effective dose. Time to local recurrence was correlated with dose by Cox regression analysis. The relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biologically effective dose was determined via logistic regression and used to estimate the TCP decrements due to prescribing by EPL calculations. Results: EPL overestimated dose compared with MC in all tumor dose-volume histogram parameters in all plans. The difference was >10% of the MC D95 to the planning target volume and gross tumor volume in 60 of 82 (73%) and 52 of 82 plans (63%), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 of 82 tumors. Controlling for gross tumor volume, higher physical and biologically effective planning target volume D95 correlated significantly with local control (P = .007 and P = .045, respectively). Compared with MC, prescribing based on EPL translated to a median TCP decrement of 4.3% (range, 1.2%-37%) and a >. 5% decrement in 46% of tumors. Conclusions: Clinical follow-up for local lung tumor control in a sizable cohort of patients treated with SABR demonstrates that EPL overestimates dose by amounts that substantially decrease TCP in a large proportion. EPL algorithms should be avoided for lung tumor SABR.

AB - Purpose: To determine the clinical impact of calculated dose differences between effective path length (EPL) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) of lung tumors. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed the treatment plans and clinical outcomes of 77 consecutive patients treated with SABR for 82 lung tumors between 2003 and 2009 at our institution. Sixty treatments were originally planned using EPL, and 22 using MC. All plans were recalculated for the same beam specifications using MC and EPL, respectively. The doses covering 95%, 50%, and 5% (D95, D50, D5, respectively) of the target volumes were compared between EPL and MC (assumed to be the actual delivered dose), both as physical dose and biologically effective dose. Time to local recurrence was correlated with dose by Cox regression analysis. The relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biologically effective dose was determined via logistic regression and used to estimate the TCP decrements due to prescribing by EPL calculations. Results: EPL overestimated dose compared with MC in all tumor dose-volume histogram parameters in all plans. The difference was >10% of the MC D95 to the planning target volume and gross tumor volume in 60 of 82 (73%) and 52 of 82 plans (63%), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 of 82 tumors. Controlling for gross tumor volume, higher physical and biologically effective planning target volume D95 correlated significantly with local control (P = .007 and P = .045, respectively). Compared with MC, prescribing based on EPL translated to a median TCP decrement of 4.3% (range, 1.2%-37%) and a >. 5% decrement in 46% of tumors. Conclusions: Clinical follow-up for local lung tumor control in a sizable cohort of patients treated with SABR demonstrates that EPL overestimates dose by amounts that substantially decrease TCP in a large proportion. EPL algorithms should be avoided for lung tumor SABR.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884354671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884354671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84884354671

VL - 3

SP - 294

EP - 300

JO - Practical Radiation Oncology

JF - Practical Radiation Oncology

SN - 1879-8500

IS - 4

ER -