Choosing strategies that work from the start: A mixed methods study to understand effective development of community–academic partnerships

Emily Gomez, Amy Drahota, Aubyn Stahmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Community–academic partnerships are believed to increase the effectiveness and feasibility of action research. While factors facilitating and hindering community–academic partnerships have been identified, their influence on the collaborative process is unknown, especially during community–academic partnership initiation and development. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative→QUALITATIVE) evaluated perspectives of members in an autism community–academic partnership to determine frequently endorsed and influential factors facilitating and hindering the collaborative process during the community–academic partnership’s development. Participants (n = 11; community stakeholders, implementation scientist, and researchers) endorsed and ranked the importance of factors present in the formation of the community–academic partnership then completed a semi-structured qualitative interview to elaborate on survey responses. Interviews were coded using a coding, comparison, and consensus method and analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process for frequency and salience of themes across interviews. Integrating mixed methods yielded ranked factors that were perceived to facilitate and hinder the development of the community–academic partnership, and highlighted the relative influence of interpersonal factors on the facilitation of community–academic partnership processes and organizational factors on the hindrance of community–academic partnership processes during development. Some discrepancies emerged between community and academic partners. Results may assist to improve the development of community–academic partnerships, which is becoming increasingly important in healthcare services research, dissemination, and implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAction Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Mixed methods
interview
autism
qualitative interview
action research
community
coding
stakeholder
Factors
present
Collaborative process
Health care services
Autism
Discrepancy
Stakeholders
Influential factors
Dissemination
Facilitation
Development process
Organizational factors

Keywords

  • autism spectrum disorder
  • collaboration
  • Community–academic partnership
  • explanatory sequential design
  • mixed methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{e3cfcf3568a14fcd98077a6ca29d2a3e,
title = "Choosing strategies that work from the start: A mixed methods study to understand effective development of community–academic partnerships",
abstract = "Community–academic partnerships are believed to increase the effectiveness and feasibility of action research. While factors facilitating and hindering community–academic partnerships have been identified, their influence on the collaborative process is unknown, especially during community–academic partnership initiation and development. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative→QUALITATIVE) evaluated perspectives of members in an autism community–academic partnership to determine frequently endorsed and influential factors facilitating and hindering the collaborative process during the community–academic partnership’s development. Participants (n = 11; community stakeholders, implementation scientist, and researchers) endorsed and ranked the importance of factors present in the formation of the community–academic partnership then completed a semi-structured qualitative interview to elaborate on survey responses. Interviews were coded using a coding, comparison, and consensus method and analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process for frequency and salience of themes across interviews. Integrating mixed methods yielded ranked factors that were perceived to facilitate and hinder the development of the community–academic partnership, and highlighted the relative influence of interpersonal factors on the facilitation of community–academic partnership processes and organizational factors on the hindrance of community–academic partnership processes during development. Some discrepancies emerged between community and academic partners. Results may assist to improve the development of community–academic partnerships, which is becoming increasingly important in healthcare services research, dissemination, and implementation.",
keywords = "autism spectrum disorder, collaboration, Community–academic partnership, explanatory sequential design, mixed methods",
author = "Emily Gomez and Amy Drahota and Aubyn Stahmer",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476750318775796",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Action Research",
issn = "1476-7503",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing strategies that work from the start

T2 - A mixed methods study to understand effective development of community–academic partnerships

AU - Gomez, Emily

AU - Drahota, Amy

AU - Stahmer, Aubyn

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Community–academic partnerships are believed to increase the effectiveness and feasibility of action research. While factors facilitating and hindering community–academic partnerships have been identified, their influence on the collaborative process is unknown, especially during community–academic partnership initiation and development. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative→QUALITATIVE) evaluated perspectives of members in an autism community–academic partnership to determine frequently endorsed and influential factors facilitating and hindering the collaborative process during the community–academic partnership’s development. Participants (n = 11; community stakeholders, implementation scientist, and researchers) endorsed and ranked the importance of factors present in the formation of the community–academic partnership then completed a semi-structured qualitative interview to elaborate on survey responses. Interviews were coded using a coding, comparison, and consensus method and analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process for frequency and salience of themes across interviews. Integrating mixed methods yielded ranked factors that were perceived to facilitate and hinder the development of the community–academic partnership, and highlighted the relative influence of interpersonal factors on the facilitation of community–academic partnership processes and organizational factors on the hindrance of community–academic partnership processes during development. Some discrepancies emerged between community and academic partners. Results may assist to improve the development of community–academic partnerships, which is becoming increasingly important in healthcare services research, dissemination, and implementation.

AB - Community–academic partnerships are believed to increase the effectiveness and feasibility of action research. While factors facilitating and hindering community–academic partnerships have been identified, their influence on the collaborative process is unknown, especially during community–academic partnership initiation and development. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study (quantitative→QUALITATIVE) evaluated perspectives of members in an autism community–academic partnership to determine frequently endorsed and influential factors facilitating and hindering the collaborative process during the community–academic partnership’s development. Participants (n = 11; community stakeholders, implementation scientist, and researchers) endorsed and ranked the importance of factors present in the formation of the community–academic partnership then completed a semi-structured qualitative interview to elaborate on survey responses. Interviews were coded using a coding, comparison, and consensus method and analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process for frequency and salience of themes across interviews. Integrating mixed methods yielded ranked factors that were perceived to facilitate and hinder the development of the community–academic partnership, and highlighted the relative influence of interpersonal factors on the facilitation of community–academic partnership processes and organizational factors on the hindrance of community–academic partnership processes during development. Some discrepancies emerged between community and academic partners. Results may assist to improve the development of community–academic partnerships, which is becoming increasingly important in healthcare services research, dissemination, and implementation.

KW - autism spectrum disorder

KW - collaboration

KW - Community–academic partnership

KW - explanatory sequential design

KW - mixed methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047431586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047431586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476750318775796

DO - 10.1177/1476750318775796

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047431586

JO - Action Research

JF - Action Research

SN - 1476-7503

ER -