Chirality in anesthesia II

Stereoselective modulation of ion channel function by secondary alcohol enantiomers

Robert J Brosnan, Diane Gong, Joseph Cotten, Bharat Keshavaprasad, C. Spencer Yost, Edmond I. Eger, James M. Sonner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chirality has been proposed as a means for distinguishing relevant from irrelevant molecular targets of action, but the sensitivity and specificity of this test is unknown for volatile anesthetics. We applied enantiomers of two chiral anesthetic alcohols (2-butanol and 2-pentanol) that are enantioselective for the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of animals and one (2-hexanol) that was not to frog oocytes. Each oocyte expressed one of three anesthetic-sensitive ion channels: a Twik-related-spinal cord K + (TRESK) channel, a γ-amino butyric acid type A (GABA A) receptor and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Using voltage-clamp techniques, we found that 2-butanol was not enantioselective for any channel (e.g., 16 mM 2-butanol R(-) and S(-) enantiomers decreased current through an NMDA receptors by 44% ± 3% [mean ± SE] and 37% ± 4%, respectively); 2-pentanol was enantioselective for one channel (the GABA A receptor, the enantiomers increasing current by 277% ± 20% and 141% ± 30%); 2-hexanol was enantioselective for both GABA A and NMDA receptors (e.g., decreasing current through the NMDA receptor by 19% ± 3% and 43% ± 5%). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of chirality as a test of anesthetic relevance under two scenarios: 1) all three channels were relevant mediators of MAC and 2) no channel was a mediator of MAC. These sensitivities and specificities were poor because there is no consistent correspondence between receptor and whole animal results. We recommend that enantioselectivity not be used as a test of relevance for inhaled anesthetic targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-91
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Ion Channels
Anesthetics
N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors
Anesthesia
Alcohols
Pentanols
GABA-A Receptors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Oocytes
Butyric Acid
Patch-Clamp Techniques
Anura
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
Spinal Cord
2-butanol
2-hexanol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Chirality in anesthesia II : Stereoselective modulation of ion channel function by secondary alcohol enantiomers. / Brosnan, Robert J; Gong, Diane; Cotten, Joseph; Keshavaprasad, Bharat; Yost, C. Spencer; Eger, Edmond I.; Sonner, James M.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 103, No. 1, 07.2006, p. 86-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brosnan, Robert J ; Gong, Diane ; Cotten, Joseph ; Keshavaprasad, Bharat ; Yost, C. Spencer ; Eger, Edmond I. ; Sonner, James M. / Chirality in anesthesia II : Stereoselective modulation of ion channel function by secondary alcohol enantiomers. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2006 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 86-91.
@article{2275b0acf436400ba5578f24d8e2c1ac,
title = "Chirality in anesthesia II: Stereoselective modulation of ion channel function by secondary alcohol enantiomers",
abstract = "Chirality has been proposed as a means for distinguishing relevant from irrelevant molecular targets of action, but the sensitivity and specificity of this test is unknown for volatile anesthetics. We applied enantiomers of two chiral anesthetic alcohols (2-butanol and 2-pentanol) that are enantioselective for the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50{\%} of animals and one (2-hexanol) that was not to frog oocytes. Each oocyte expressed one of three anesthetic-sensitive ion channels: a Twik-related-spinal cord K + (TRESK) channel, a γ-amino butyric acid type A (GABA A) receptor and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Using voltage-clamp techniques, we found that 2-butanol was not enantioselective for any channel (e.g., 16 mM 2-butanol R(-) and S(-) enantiomers decreased current through an NMDA receptors by 44{\%} ± 3{\%} [mean ± SE] and 37{\%} ± 4{\%}, respectively); 2-pentanol was enantioselective for one channel (the GABA A receptor, the enantiomers increasing current by 277{\%} ± 20{\%} and 141{\%} ± 30{\%}); 2-hexanol was enantioselective for both GABA A and NMDA receptors (e.g., decreasing current through the NMDA receptor by 19{\%} ± 3{\%} and 43{\%} ± 5{\%}). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of chirality as a test of anesthetic relevance under two scenarios: 1) all three channels were relevant mediators of MAC and 2) no channel was a mediator of MAC. These sensitivities and specificities were poor because there is no consistent correspondence between receptor and whole animal results. We recommend that enantioselectivity not be used as a test of relevance for inhaled anesthetic targets.",
author = "Brosnan, {Robert J} and Diane Gong and Joseph Cotten and Bharat Keshavaprasad and Yost, {C. Spencer} and Eger, {Edmond I.} and Sonner, {James M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000221437.87338.af",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "86--91",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chirality in anesthesia II

T2 - Stereoselective modulation of ion channel function by secondary alcohol enantiomers

AU - Brosnan, Robert J

AU - Gong, Diane

AU - Cotten, Joseph

AU - Keshavaprasad, Bharat

AU - Yost, C. Spencer

AU - Eger, Edmond I.

AU - Sonner, James M.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Chirality has been proposed as a means for distinguishing relevant from irrelevant molecular targets of action, but the sensitivity and specificity of this test is unknown for volatile anesthetics. We applied enantiomers of two chiral anesthetic alcohols (2-butanol and 2-pentanol) that are enantioselective for the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of animals and one (2-hexanol) that was not to frog oocytes. Each oocyte expressed one of three anesthetic-sensitive ion channels: a Twik-related-spinal cord K + (TRESK) channel, a γ-amino butyric acid type A (GABA A) receptor and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Using voltage-clamp techniques, we found that 2-butanol was not enantioselective for any channel (e.g., 16 mM 2-butanol R(-) and S(-) enantiomers decreased current through an NMDA receptors by 44% ± 3% [mean ± SE] and 37% ± 4%, respectively); 2-pentanol was enantioselective for one channel (the GABA A receptor, the enantiomers increasing current by 277% ± 20% and 141% ± 30%); 2-hexanol was enantioselective for both GABA A and NMDA receptors (e.g., decreasing current through the NMDA receptor by 19% ± 3% and 43% ± 5%). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of chirality as a test of anesthetic relevance under two scenarios: 1) all three channels were relevant mediators of MAC and 2) no channel was a mediator of MAC. These sensitivities and specificities were poor because there is no consistent correspondence between receptor and whole animal results. We recommend that enantioselectivity not be used as a test of relevance for inhaled anesthetic targets.

AB - Chirality has been proposed as a means for distinguishing relevant from irrelevant molecular targets of action, but the sensitivity and specificity of this test is unknown for volatile anesthetics. We applied enantiomers of two chiral anesthetic alcohols (2-butanol and 2-pentanol) that are enantioselective for the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) preventing movement in 50% of animals and one (2-hexanol) that was not to frog oocytes. Each oocyte expressed one of three anesthetic-sensitive ion channels: a Twik-related-spinal cord K + (TRESK) channel, a γ-amino butyric acid type A (GABA A) receptor and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Using voltage-clamp techniques, we found that 2-butanol was not enantioselective for any channel (e.g., 16 mM 2-butanol R(-) and S(-) enantiomers decreased current through an NMDA receptors by 44% ± 3% [mean ± SE] and 37% ± 4%, respectively); 2-pentanol was enantioselective for one channel (the GABA A receptor, the enantiomers increasing current by 277% ± 20% and 141% ± 30%); 2-hexanol was enantioselective for both GABA A and NMDA receptors (e.g., decreasing current through the NMDA receptor by 19% ± 3% and 43% ± 5%). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of chirality as a test of anesthetic relevance under two scenarios: 1) all three channels were relevant mediators of MAC and 2) no channel was a mediator of MAC. These sensitivities and specificities were poor because there is no consistent correspondence between receptor and whole animal results. We recommend that enantioselectivity not be used as a test of relevance for inhaled anesthetic targets.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745807650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745807650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000221437.87338.af

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000221437.87338.af

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 86

EP - 91

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 1

ER -