ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

Stephen G. Landt, Georgi K. Marinov, Anshul Kundaje, Pouya Kheradpour, Florencia Pauli, Serafim Batzoglou, Bradley E. Bernstein, Peter Bickel, James B. Brown, Philip Cayting, Yiwen Chen, Gilberto DeSalvo, Charles Epstein, Katherine I. Fisher-Aylor, Ghia Euskirchen, Mark Gerstein, Jason Gertz, Alexander J. Hartemink, Michael M. Hoffman, Vishwanath R. IyerYoungsook L. Jung, Subhradip Karmakar, Manolis Kellis, Peter V. Kharchenko, Qunhua Li, Tao Liu, X. Shirley Liu, Lijia Ma, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Richard M. Myers, Peter J. Park, Michael J. Pazin, Marc D. Perry, Debasish Raha, Timothy E. Reddy, Joel Rozowsky, Noam Shoresh, Arend Sidow, Matthew Slattery, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, Michael Y. Tolstorukov, Kevin P. White, Simon Xi, Peggy J. Farnham, Jason D. Lieb, Barbara J. Wold, Michael Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

838 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become a valuable and widely used approach for mapping the genomic location of transcription-factor binding and histone modifications in living cells. Despite its widespread use, there are considerable differences in how these experiments are conducted, how the results are scored and evaluated for quality, and how the data and metadata are archived for public use. These practices affect the quality and utility of any global ChIP experiment. Through our experience in performing ChIP-seq experiments, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed a set of working standards and guidelines for ChIP experiments that are updated routinely. The current guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data and metadata reporting, and data quality assessment. We discuss how ChIP quality, assessed in these ways, affects different uses of ChIP-seq data. All data sets used in the analysis have been deposited for public viewing and downloading at the ENCODE (http://encodeproject.org/ENCODE/) and modENCODE (http://www.modencode.org/) portals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1813-1831
Number of pages19
JournalGenome Research
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Landt, S. G., Marinov, G. K., Kundaje, A., Kheradpour, P., Pauli, F., Batzoglou, S., Bernstein, B. E., Bickel, P., Brown, J. B., Cayting, P., Chen, Y., DeSalvo, G., Epstein, C., Fisher-Aylor, K. I., Euskirchen, G., Gerstein, M., Gertz, J., Hartemink, A. J., Hoffman, M. M., ... Snyder, M. (2012). ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Research, 22(9), 1813-1831. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.136184.111