Characterization of airway device cuff volumes at simulated altitude

Jennifer Law, Aaron E Bair, Jason Capra, Allen Holder, Robert Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Cuff volume of an air-filled airway device varies inversely with ambient pressure at altitude. This may result in problems with ventilation, aspiration, and tissue ischemia in intubated patients transported by aircraft. We aimed to characterize cuff volume changes in airway devices as a function of altitude. Methods: Four inflatable airway devices [endotracheal tube (ETT), Combitube, King tube, and laryngeal mask airway (LMA)], each inflated with air or water, were evaluated for cuff volume changes in an altitude chamber simulating ascent and descent from ground level to 15,000 ft (4572 m). A novel cuff-less supraglottic device called i-gel was also tested. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of altitude and cuff content on cuff volume. Results: We found a linear relationship between air-filled cuff volume and altitude in all the inflatable airway devices. The Combitube (correlation coefficient R 5 0.94) and King tube (R = 0.98) showed the clearest linear relationship; the ETT (R = 0.70) and LMA (0.86) showed modest correlations. With water-filled cuffs, the rate of increase was relatively smaller in all the inflatable devices except the ETT, which remained constant. The difference between air- and water-filled cuffs was statistically significant in each inflatable device ( P < 0.001). The i-gel showed no volume change at any of the tested altitudes. Conclusions: Cuff volume of inflatable airway devices increased linearly with altitude. The dualcuffed supraglottic devices showed greater volume changes, likely due to the combined effect of their two cuffs. Of the inflatable devices, the water-filled ETT was the least sensitive to altitude changes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-558
Number of pages4
JournalAviation Space and Environmental Medicine
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Air
Laryngeal Masks
Water
Gels
Aircraft
Ventilation
Linear Models
Ischemia
Pressure

Keywords

  • Aeromedical transport
  • Airway devices
  • Altitude
  • Boyle's law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Characterization of airway device cuff volumes at simulated altitude. / Law, Jennifer; Bair, Aaron E; Capra, Jason; Holder, Allen; Allen, Robert.

In: Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 82, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 555-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Law, Jennifer ; Bair, Aaron E ; Capra, Jason ; Holder, Allen ; Allen, Robert. / Characterization of airway device cuff volumes at simulated altitude. In: Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 82, No. 5. pp. 555-558.
@article{8b4d55562bac4ad8b295e9c155ef8963,
title = "Characterization of airway device cuff volumes at simulated altitude",
abstract = "Introduction: Cuff volume of an air-filled airway device varies inversely with ambient pressure at altitude. This may result in problems with ventilation, aspiration, and tissue ischemia in intubated patients transported by aircraft. We aimed to characterize cuff volume changes in airway devices as a function of altitude. Methods: Four inflatable airway devices [endotracheal tube (ETT), Combitube, King tube, and laryngeal mask airway (LMA)], each inflated with air or water, were evaluated for cuff volume changes in an altitude chamber simulating ascent and descent from ground level to 15,000 ft (4572 m). A novel cuff-less supraglottic device called i-gel was also tested. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of altitude and cuff content on cuff volume. Results: We found a linear relationship between air-filled cuff volume and altitude in all the inflatable airway devices. The Combitube (correlation coefficient R 5 0.94) and King tube (R = 0.98) showed the clearest linear relationship; the ETT (R = 0.70) and LMA (0.86) showed modest correlations. With water-filled cuffs, the rate of increase was relatively smaller in all the inflatable devices except the ETT, which remained constant. The difference between air- and water-filled cuffs was statistically significant in each inflatable device ( P < 0.001). The i-gel showed no volume change at any of the tested altitudes. Conclusions: Cuff volume of inflatable airway devices increased linearly with altitude. The dualcuffed supraglottic devices showed greater volume changes, likely due to the combined effect of their two cuffs. Of the inflatable devices, the water-filled ETT was the least sensitive to altitude changes.",
keywords = "Aeromedical transport, Airway devices, Altitude, Boyle's law",
author = "Jennifer Law and Bair, {Aaron E} and Jason Capra and Allen Holder and Robert Allen",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3357/ASEM.2834.2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "555--558",
journal = "Aerospace medicine and human performance",
issn = "2375-6314",
publisher = "Aerospace Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization of airway device cuff volumes at simulated altitude

AU - Law, Jennifer

AU - Bair, Aaron E

AU - Capra, Jason

AU - Holder, Allen

AU - Allen, Robert

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Introduction: Cuff volume of an air-filled airway device varies inversely with ambient pressure at altitude. This may result in problems with ventilation, aspiration, and tissue ischemia in intubated patients transported by aircraft. We aimed to characterize cuff volume changes in airway devices as a function of altitude. Methods: Four inflatable airway devices [endotracheal tube (ETT), Combitube, King tube, and laryngeal mask airway (LMA)], each inflated with air or water, were evaluated for cuff volume changes in an altitude chamber simulating ascent and descent from ground level to 15,000 ft (4572 m). A novel cuff-less supraglottic device called i-gel was also tested. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of altitude and cuff content on cuff volume. Results: We found a linear relationship between air-filled cuff volume and altitude in all the inflatable airway devices. The Combitube (correlation coefficient R 5 0.94) and King tube (R = 0.98) showed the clearest linear relationship; the ETT (R = 0.70) and LMA (0.86) showed modest correlations. With water-filled cuffs, the rate of increase was relatively smaller in all the inflatable devices except the ETT, which remained constant. The difference between air- and water-filled cuffs was statistically significant in each inflatable device ( P < 0.001). The i-gel showed no volume change at any of the tested altitudes. Conclusions: Cuff volume of inflatable airway devices increased linearly with altitude. The dualcuffed supraglottic devices showed greater volume changes, likely due to the combined effect of their two cuffs. Of the inflatable devices, the water-filled ETT was the least sensitive to altitude changes.

AB - Introduction: Cuff volume of an air-filled airway device varies inversely with ambient pressure at altitude. This may result in problems with ventilation, aspiration, and tissue ischemia in intubated patients transported by aircraft. We aimed to characterize cuff volume changes in airway devices as a function of altitude. Methods: Four inflatable airway devices [endotracheal tube (ETT), Combitube, King tube, and laryngeal mask airway (LMA)], each inflated with air or water, were evaluated for cuff volume changes in an altitude chamber simulating ascent and descent from ground level to 15,000 ft (4572 m). A novel cuff-less supraglottic device called i-gel was also tested. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the effect of altitude and cuff content on cuff volume. Results: We found a linear relationship between air-filled cuff volume and altitude in all the inflatable airway devices. The Combitube (correlation coefficient R 5 0.94) and King tube (R = 0.98) showed the clearest linear relationship; the ETT (R = 0.70) and LMA (0.86) showed modest correlations. With water-filled cuffs, the rate of increase was relatively smaller in all the inflatable devices except the ETT, which remained constant. The difference between air- and water-filled cuffs was statistically significant in each inflatable device ( P < 0.001). The i-gel showed no volume change at any of the tested altitudes. Conclusions: Cuff volume of inflatable airway devices increased linearly with altitude. The dualcuffed supraglottic devices showed greater volume changes, likely due to the combined effect of their two cuffs. Of the inflatable devices, the water-filled ETT was the least sensitive to altitude changes.

KW - Aeromedical transport

KW - Airway devices

KW - Altitude

KW - Boyle's law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955516461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955516461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3357/ASEM.2834.2011

DO - 10.3357/ASEM.2834.2011

M3 - Article

C2 - 21614871

AN - SCOPUS:79955516461

VL - 82

SP - 555

EP - 558

JO - Aerospace medicine and human performance

JF - Aerospace medicine and human performance

SN - 2375-6314

IS - 5

ER -