Central Venous Catheter Infections in Burn Patients with Scheduled Catheter Exchange and Replacement

Michael S. O'Mara, Nancy L. Reed, Tina L Palmieri, David G Greenhalgh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Consensus in the general critical care patient population is that routine central venous catheter change is not necessary, and that central lines should not be rewired in the setting of possible infection. This concept has not carried over into the burn realm. In burn patients the rewiring of lines may lead to increased infection rates. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive critically ill burn patients requiring central line placement were included: 277 central lines and 1691 catheter days. Standard care protocol was followed in all patients, with lines being placed initially by new site insertion, changed over a guidewire on day 6, and moved to a new site on day 12. New sites were used for all suspected or documented line infections. All other care was the same. New site placements were compared to guidewire exchanges. Pediatric patients (under the age of 18) were considered with and separate from adults. Results: There was no difference in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) between lines placed by new site access (15.4/1000 catheter days) or by guidewire exchange (15.4/1000). Considering the 979 pediatric line days, there was a distinct difference, with new sites having 16.6/1000, and rewires 25.2/1000. Adults revealed the opposite trend, rewires having no occurrences of CRBSI, and new sites 13.7/1000. Children had a higher rate of CRBSI, 19.4/1000 days, compared to adults at 9.8/1000 days. Children had larger burns (P < 0.0001), more femoral lines (P = 0.0003), and lines closer to the burn wound (P = 0.001). Conclusions: In pediatric patients guidewire exchange increased the incidence of infection. This was not noted in adult patients. The utility of guidewire exchange needs to be further investigated in adults, although this data would imply that it may be safe to use routine rewire of lines in adult burn patients. Pediatric patients require an increase in vigilance to minimize CRBSI. Central venous catheters should be removed as soon as not needed and routine change of lines in burn patients needs continued evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-350
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Central Venous Catheters
Catheters
Catheter-Related Infections
Infection
Pediatrics
Incidence
Critical Care
Thigh
Burns
Critical Illness

Keywords

  • burn
  • catheter-related blood stream infection
  • central line
  • central venous catheter
  • complication
  • CRBSI
  • guidewire
  • infection
  • pediatric
  • rewire
  • scheduled change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Central Venous Catheter Infections in Burn Patients with Scheduled Catheter Exchange and Replacement. / O'Mara, Michael S.; Reed, Nancy L.; Palmieri, Tina L; Greenhalgh, David G.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 142, No. 2, 10.2007, p. 341-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{983adddbe83043dca9c2fc0bfbf07ae4,
title = "Central Venous Catheter Infections in Burn Patients with Scheduled Catheter Exchange and Replacement",
abstract = "Introduction: Consensus in the general critical care patient population is that routine central venous catheter change is not necessary, and that central lines should not be rewired in the setting of possible infection. This concept has not carried over into the burn realm. In burn patients the rewiring of lines may lead to increased infection rates. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive critically ill burn patients requiring central line placement were included: 277 central lines and 1691 catheter days. Standard care protocol was followed in all patients, with lines being placed initially by new site insertion, changed over a guidewire on day 6, and moved to a new site on day 12. New sites were used for all suspected or documented line infections. All other care was the same. New site placements were compared to guidewire exchanges. Pediatric patients (under the age of 18) were considered with and separate from adults. Results: There was no difference in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) between lines placed by new site access (15.4/1000 catheter days) or by guidewire exchange (15.4/1000). Considering the 979 pediatric line days, there was a distinct difference, with new sites having 16.6/1000, and rewires 25.2/1000. Adults revealed the opposite trend, rewires having no occurrences of CRBSI, and new sites 13.7/1000. Children had a higher rate of CRBSI, 19.4/1000 days, compared to adults at 9.8/1000 days. Children had larger burns (P < 0.0001), more femoral lines (P = 0.0003), and lines closer to the burn wound (P = 0.001). Conclusions: In pediatric patients guidewire exchange increased the incidence of infection. This was not noted in adult patients. The utility of guidewire exchange needs to be further investigated in adults, although this data would imply that it may be safe to use routine rewire of lines in adult burn patients. Pediatric patients require an increase in vigilance to minimize CRBSI. Central venous catheters should be removed as soon as not needed and routine change of lines in burn patients needs continued evaluation.",
keywords = "burn, catheter-related blood stream infection, central line, central venous catheter, complication, CRBSI, guidewire, infection, pediatric, rewire, scheduled change",
author = "O'Mara, {Michael S.} and Reed, {Nancy L.} and Palmieri, {Tina L} and Greenhalgh, {David G}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.063",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "341--350",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Central Venous Catheter Infections in Burn Patients with Scheduled Catheter Exchange and Replacement

AU - O'Mara, Michael S.

AU - Reed, Nancy L.

AU - Palmieri, Tina L

AU - Greenhalgh, David G

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Introduction: Consensus in the general critical care patient population is that routine central venous catheter change is not necessary, and that central lines should not be rewired in the setting of possible infection. This concept has not carried over into the burn realm. In burn patients the rewiring of lines may lead to increased infection rates. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive critically ill burn patients requiring central line placement were included: 277 central lines and 1691 catheter days. Standard care protocol was followed in all patients, with lines being placed initially by new site insertion, changed over a guidewire on day 6, and moved to a new site on day 12. New sites were used for all suspected or documented line infections. All other care was the same. New site placements were compared to guidewire exchanges. Pediatric patients (under the age of 18) were considered with and separate from adults. Results: There was no difference in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) between lines placed by new site access (15.4/1000 catheter days) or by guidewire exchange (15.4/1000). Considering the 979 pediatric line days, there was a distinct difference, with new sites having 16.6/1000, and rewires 25.2/1000. Adults revealed the opposite trend, rewires having no occurrences of CRBSI, and new sites 13.7/1000. Children had a higher rate of CRBSI, 19.4/1000 days, compared to adults at 9.8/1000 days. Children had larger burns (P < 0.0001), more femoral lines (P = 0.0003), and lines closer to the burn wound (P = 0.001). Conclusions: In pediatric patients guidewire exchange increased the incidence of infection. This was not noted in adult patients. The utility of guidewire exchange needs to be further investigated in adults, although this data would imply that it may be safe to use routine rewire of lines in adult burn patients. Pediatric patients require an increase in vigilance to minimize CRBSI. Central venous catheters should be removed as soon as not needed and routine change of lines in burn patients needs continued evaluation.

AB - Introduction: Consensus in the general critical care patient population is that routine central venous catheter change is not necessary, and that central lines should not be rewired in the setting of possible infection. This concept has not carried over into the burn realm. In burn patients the rewiring of lines may lead to increased infection rates. Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive critically ill burn patients requiring central line placement were included: 277 central lines and 1691 catheter days. Standard care protocol was followed in all patients, with lines being placed initially by new site insertion, changed over a guidewire on day 6, and moved to a new site on day 12. New sites were used for all suspected or documented line infections. All other care was the same. New site placements were compared to guidewire exchanges. Pediatric patients (under the age of 18) were considered with and separate from adults. Results: There was no difference in the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) between lines placed by new site access (15.4/1000 catheter days) or by guidewire exchange (15.4/1000). Considering the 979 pediatric line days, there was a distinct difference, with new sites having 16.6/1000, and rewires 25.2/1000. Adults revealed the opposite trend, rewires having no occurrences of CRBSI, and new sites 13.7/1000. Children had a higher rate of CRBSI, 19.4/1000 days, compared to adults at 9.8/1000 days. Children had larger burns (P < 0.0001), more femoral lines (P = 0.0003), and lines closer to the burn wound (P = 0.001). Conclusions: In pediatric patients guidewire exchange increased the incidence of infection. This was not noted in adult patients. The utility of guidewire exchange needs to be further investigated in adults, although this data would imply that it may be safe to use routine rewire of lines in adult burn patients. Pediatric patients require an increase in vigilance to minimize CRBSI. Central venous catheters should be removed as soon as not needed and routine change of lines in burn patients needs continued evaluation.

KW - burn

KW - catheter-related blood stream infection

KW - central line

KW - central venous catheter

KW - complication

KW - CRBSI

KW - guidewire

KW - infection

KW - pediatric

KW - rewire

KW - scheduled change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548696402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548696402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.063

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.063

M3 - Article

C2 - 17631903

AN - SCOPUS:34548696402

VL - 142

SP - 341

EP - 350

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 2

ER -