Centers for Disease Control and Prevention injury research agenda

Identification of acute care research topics of interest to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Gregory Jurkovich, Frederick P. Rivara, Jennifer M. Johansen, Ronald V. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this report is to identify the most important research questions pertaining to the acute care of the injured patient using a Web-based Delphi technique to achieve expert opinion consensus. Methods: Experts in trauma care from the United States and Canada (n = 39) generated structured research questions and then ranked these questions in order of importance, using a Web-based survey for question generation, question ranking, and a Delphi technique of consensus. Guidelines for question construction and ranking specified that participants considered questions that fall within the interest and domain of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). Results: One hundred thirty-seven questions in 18 distinct categories of interest were initially generated. After two rounds of merging, collating, reassessing, and ranking by significance and importance, 25 research questions were deemed most important and significant in the care of the injured patient. Ten of these (40%) were considered to be appropriate issues for the CDC-NCIPC to address and fund, dealing with injury prevention strategies, trauma systems design and funding, the epidemiology of injury, and global outcome determinants. These 25 questions were also reviewed with consideration given to the most likely source of federal funding of investigations. Conclusion: This report identifies the areas of trauma care in which research efforts might best be directed. Fully 40% of the key research questions could be considered to fall under the interest and auspices of the CDC-NCIPC. The remaining questions cover a broad range of topics and likely funding sources, emphasizing the need for a coordinated oversight of research funding in trauma care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1166-1170
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Wounds and Injuries
Research
Delphi Technique
Patient Care
Expert Testimony
Financial Management
Canada
Epidemiology
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Delphi survey
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

@article{bf717aa205df4a94bc0e488f97aa3a05,
title = "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention injury research agenda: Identification of acute care research topics of interest to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this report is to identify the most important research questions pertaining to the acute care of the injured patient using a Web-based Delphi technique to achieve expert opinion consensus. Methods: Experts in trauma care from the United States and Canada (n = 39) generated structured research questions and then ranked these questions in order of importance, using a Web-based survey for question generation, question ranking, and a Delphi technique of consensus. Guidelines for question construction and ranking specified that participants considered questions that fall within the interest and domain of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). Results: One hundred thirty-seven questions in 18 distinct categories of interest were initially generated. After two rounds of merging, collating, reassessing, and ranking by significance and importance, 25 research questions were deemed most important and significant in the care of the injured patient. Ten of these (40{\%}) were considered to be appropriate issues for the CDC-NCIPC to address and fund, dealing with injury prevention strategies, trauma systems design and funding, the epidemiology of injury, and global outcome determinants. These 25 questions were also reviewed with consideration given to the most likely source of federal funding of investigations. Conclusion: This report identifies the areas of trauma care in which research efforts might best be directed. Fully 40{\%} of the key research questions could be considered to fall under the interest and auspices of the CDC-NCIPC. The remaining questions cover a broad range of topics and likely funding sources, emphasizing the need for a coordinated oversight of research funding in trauma care.",
keywords = "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Delphi survey, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Randomized controlled trials, Systematic review",
author = "Gregory Jurkovich and Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Johansen, {Jennifer M.} and Maier, {Ronald V.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.TA.0000127764.98514.99",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "1166--1170",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention injury research agenda

T2 - Identification of acute care research topics of interest to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Johansen, Jennifer M.

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Background: The purpose of this report is to identify the most important research questions pertaining to the acute care of the injured patient using a Web-based Delphi technique to achieve expert opinion consensus. Methods: Experts in trauma care from the United States and Canada (n = 39) generated structured research questions and then ranked these questions in order of importance, using a Web-based survey for question generation, question ranking, and a Delphi technique of consensus. Guidelines for question construction and ranking specified that participants considered questions that fall within the interest and domain of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). Results: One hundred thirty-seven questions in 18 distinct categories of interest were initially generated. After two rounds of merging, collating, reassessing, and ranking by significance and importance, 25 research questions were deemed most important and significant in the care of the injured patient. Ten of these (40%) were considered to be appropriate issues for the CDC-NCIPC to address and fund, dealing with injury prevention strategies, trauma systems design and funding, the epidemiology of injury, and global outcome determinants. These 25 questions were also reviewed with consideration given to the most likely source of federal funding of investigations. Conclusion: This report identifies the areas of trauma care in which research efforts might best be directed. Fully 40% of the key research questions could be considered to fall under the interest and auspices of the CDC-NCIPC. The remaining questions cover a broad range of topics and likely funding sources, emphasizing the need for a coordinated oversight of research funding in trauma care.

AB - Background: The purpose of this report is to identify the most important research questions pertaining to the acute care of the injured patient using a Web-based Delphi technique to achieve expert opinion consensus. Methods: Experts in trauma care from the United States and Canada (n = 39) generated structured research questions and then ranked these questions in order of importance, using a Web-based survey for question generation, question ranking, and a Delphi technique of consensus. Guidelines for question construction and ranking specified that participants considered questions that fall within the interest and domain of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). Results: One hundred thirty-seven questions in 18 distinct categories of interest were initially generated. After two rounds of merging, collating, reassessing, and ranking by significance and importance, 25 research questions were deemed most important and significant in the care of the injured patient. Ten of these (40%) were considered to be appropriate issues for the CDC-NCIPC to address and fund, dealing with injury prevention strategies, trauma systems design and funding, the epidemiology of injury, and global outcome determinants. These 25 questions were also reviewed with consideration given to the most likely source of federal funding of investigations. Conclusion: This report identifies the areas of trauma care in which research efforts might best be directed. Fully 40% of the key research questions could be considered to fall under the interest and auspices of the CDC-NCIPC. The remaining questions cover a broad range of topics and likely funding sources, emphasizing the need for a coordinated oversight of research funding in trauma care.

KW - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

KW - Delphi survey

KW - National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942702009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942702009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.TA.0000127764.98514.99

DO - 10.1097/01.TA.0000127764.98514.99

M3 - Review article

VL - 56

SP - 1166

EP - 1170

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -