Castration of Sex Offenders: Prisoners' Rights Versus Public Safety

Charles L Scott, Trent Holmberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sexual victimization of children and adults is a significant treatment and public policy problem in the United States. To address increasing concerns regarding sex offender recidivism, nine states have passed legislation since 1996 authorizing the use of either chemical or physical castration. In most statutes, a repeat offender's eligibility for probation or parole is linked to acceptance of mandated hormonal therapy. Future legal challenges to this wave of legislation will probably include arguments that such laws violate constitutional rights guaranteed to the offender by the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. When the promise of freedom is predicated on mandated treatment, the clinician must carefully assess the validity of informed consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-509
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume31
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Prisoners
Castration
prisoner
offender
legislation
repeat offender
Legislation
Safety
constitutional law
probation
victimization
statute
amendment
Crime Victims
public policy
acceptance
Jurisprudence
Public Policy
Informed Consent
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Castration of Sex Offenders : Prisoners' Rights Versus Public Safety. / Scott, Charles L; Holmberg, Trent.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2003, p. 502-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4abc10f0ccf4448ab99b2b83260337e1,
title = "Castration of Sex Offenders: Prisoners' Rights Versus Public Safety",
abstract = "Sexual victimization of children and adults is a significant treatment and public policy problem in the United States. To address increasing concerns regarding sex offender recidivism, nine states have passed legislation since 1996 authorizing the use of either chemical or physical castration. In most statutes, a repeat offender's eligibility for probation or parole is linked to acceptance of mandated hormonal therapy. Future legal challenges to this wave of legislation will probably include arguments that such laws violate constitutional rights guaranteed to the offender by the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. When the promise of freedom is predicated on mandated treatment, the clinician must carefully assess the validity of informed consent.",
author = "Scott, {Charles L} and Trent Holmberg",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "502--509",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Castration of Sex Offenders

T2 - Prisoners' Rights Versus Public Safety

AU - Scott, Charles L

AU - Holmberg, Trent

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Sexual victimization of children and adults is a significant treatment and public policy problem in the United States. To address increasing concerns regarding sex offender recidivism, nine states have passed legislation since 1996 authorizing the use of either chemical or physical castration. In most statutes, a repeat offender's eligibility for probation or parole is linked to acceptance of mandated hormonal therapy. Future legal challenges to this wave of legislation will probably include arguments that such laws violate constitutional rights guaranteed to the offender by the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. When the promise of freedom is predicated on mandated treatment, the clinician must carefully assess the validity of informed consent.

AB - Sexual victimization of children and adults is a significant treatment and public policy problem in the United States. To address increasing concerns regarding sex offender recidivism, nine states have passed legislation since 1996 authorizing the use of either chemical or physical castration. In most statutes, a repeat offender's eligibility for probation or parole is linked to acceptance of mandated hormonal therapy. Future legal challenges to this wave of legislation will probably include arguments that such laws violate constitutional rights guaranteed to the offender by the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. When the promise of freedom is predicated on mandated treatment, the clinician must carefully assess the validity of informed consent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642434269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642434269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14974806

AN - SCOPUS:1642434269

VL - 31

SP - 502

EP - 509

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 4

ER -