Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in patients with mild-to-moderate radiographic hip osteoarthritis

Cory Wyatt, Deepak Kumar, Karupppasamy Subburaj, Sonia Lee, Lorenzo Nardo, Divya Narayanan, Drew Lansdown, Thomas Vail, Thomas M. Link, Richard B. Souza, Sharmila Majumdar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To analyze region-specific T1ρ and T2 relaxation times of the hip joint cartilage in relation to presence or absence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and presence or absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected cartilage defects. Methods Weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRI studies of the hip were obtained from 84 volunteers. Based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scoring of the radiographs, 54 subjects were classified as healthy controls (K/L grade ≤1) and 30 were classified as having mild or moderate radiographic hip OA (K/L grades 2 or 3, respectively). Two-dimensional fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MRI sequences were used for semiquantitative clinical scoring of cartilage defects, and a T1ρ/T2 sequence was used to quantitatively assess the cartilage matrix. The femoral and acetabular cartilage was then segmented into 8 regions and the mean T1ρ/T2 values were calculated. Differences in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were compared between subjects with and those without radiographic hip OA, and those with and those without femoral or acetabular cartilage defects. Results Higher T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the anterior superior and central regions of the acetabular cartilage were seen in individuals with radiographic hip OA and those with acetabular cartilage defects compared to their respective controls (P<0.05). In the femoral cartilage, the differences in T1ρ and T2 were not significant for any of the comparisons. Significant differences in the T1ρ and T2 values (each P < 0.05) were found in more subregions of the cartilage and across the whole cartilage when subjects were stratified based on the presence of MRI-detected cartilage defects than when they were stratified based on the presence of radiographic hip OA. Conclusion T1ρ and T2 relaxation parameters are sensitive to the presence of cartilage degeneration. Both parameters may therefore support MRI evidence of cartilage defects of the hip.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1548-1556
Number of pages9
JournalArthritis and Rheumatology
Volume67
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hip Osteoarthritis
Cartilage
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Thigh
Hip
Hip Joint
Weight-Bearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in patients with mild-to-moderate radiographic hip osteoarthritis. / Wyatt, Cory; Kumar, Deepak; Subburaj, Karupppasamy; Lee, Sonia; Nardo, Lorenzo; Narayanan, Divya; Lansdown, Drew; Vail, Thomas; Link, Thomas M.; Souza, Richard B.; Majumdar, Sharmila.

In: Arthritis and Rheumatology, Vol. 67, No. 6, 01.01.2015, p. 1548-1556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wyatt, C, Kumar, D, Subburaj, K, Lee, S, Nardo, L, Narayanan, D, Lansdown, D, Vail, T, Link, TM, Souza, RB & Majumdar, S 2015, 'Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in patients with mild-to-moderate radiographic hip osteoarthritis', Arthritis and Rheumatology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1548-1556. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39074
Wyatt, Cory ; Kumar, Deepak ; Subburaj, Karupppasamy ; Lee, Sonia ; Nardo, Lorenzo ; Narayanan, Divya ; Lansdown, Drew ; Vail, Thomas ; Link, Thomas M. ; Souza, Richard B. ; Majumdar, Sharmila. / Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in patients with mild-to-moderate radiographic hip osteoarthritis. In: Arthritis and Rheumatology. 2015 ; Vol. 67, No. 6. pp. 1548-1556.
@article{5d25b705ce854133813b97d492fdf72b,
title = "Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in patients with mild-to-moderate radiographic hip osteoarthritis",
abstract = "Objective To analyze region-specific T1ρ and T2 relaxation times of the hip joint cartilage in relation to presence or absence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and presence or absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected cartilage defects. Methods Weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRI studies of the hip were obtained from 84 volunteers. Based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scoring of the radiographs, 54 subjects were classified as healthy controls (K/L grade ≤1) and 30 were classified as having mild or moderate radiographic hip OA (K/L grades 2 or 3, respectively). Two-dimensional fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MRI sequences were used for semiquantitative clinical scoring of cartilage defects, and a T1ρ/T2 sequence was used to quantitatively assess the cartilage matrix. The femoral and acetabular cartilage was then segmented into 8 regions and the mean T1ρ/T2 values were calculated. Differences in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were compared between subjects with and those without radiographic hip OA, and those with and those without femoral or acetabular cartilage defects. Results Higher T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the anterior superior and central regions of the acetabular cartilage were seen in individuals with radiographic hip OA and those with acetabular cartilage defects compared to their respective controls (P<0.05). In the femoral cartilage, the differences in T1ρ and T2 were not significant for any of the comparisons. Significant differences in the T1ρ and T2 values (each P < 0.05) were found in more subregions of the cartilage and across the whole cartilage when subjects were stratified based on the presence of MRI-detected cartilage defects than when they were stratified based on the presence of radiographic hip OA. Conclusion T1ρ and T2 relaxation parameters are sensitive to the presence of cartilage degeneration. Both parameters may therefore support MRI evidence of cartilage defects of the hip.",
author = "Cory Wyatt and Deepak Kumar and Karupppasamy Subburaj and Sonia Lee and Lorenzo Nardo and Divya Narayanan and Drew Lansdown and Thomas Vail and Link, {Thomas M.} and Souza, {Richard B.} and Sharmila Majumdar",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/art.39074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "1548--1556",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in patients with mild-to-moderate radiographic hip osteoarthritis

AU - Wyatt, Cory

AU - Kumar, Deepak

AU - Subburaj, Karupppasamy

AU - Lee, Sonia

AU - Nardo, Lorenzo

AU - Narayanan, Divya

AU - Lansdown, Drew

AU - Vail, Thomas

AU - Link, Thomas M.

AU - Souza, Richard B.

AU - Majumdar, Sharmila

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objective To analyze region-specific T1ρ and T2 relaxation times of the hip joint cartilage in relation to presence or absence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and presence or absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected cartilage defects. Methods Weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRI studies of the hip were obtained from 84 volunteers. Based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scoring of the radiographs, 54 subjects were classified as healthy controls (K/L grade ≤1) and 30 were classified as having mild or moderate radiographic hip OA (K/L grades 2 or 3, respectively). Two-dimensional fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MRI sequences were used for semiquantitative clinical scoring of cartilage defects, and a T1ρ/T2 sequence was used to quantitatively assess the cartilage matrix. The femoral and acetabular cartilage was then segmented into 8 regions and the mean T1ρ/T2 values were calculated. Differences in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were compared between subjects with and those without radiographic hip OA, and those with and those without femoral or acetabular cartilage defects. Results Higher T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the anterior superior and central regions of the acetabular cartilage were seen in individuals with radiographic hip OA and those with acetabular cartilage defects compared to their respective controls (P<0.05). In the femoral cartilage, the differences in T1ρ and T2 were not significant for any of the comparisons. Significant differences in the T1ρ and T2 values (each P < 0.05) were found in more subregions of the cartilage and across the whole cartilage when subjects were stratified based on the presence of MRI-detected cartilage defects than when they were stratified based on the presence of radiographic hip OA. Conclusion T1ρ and T2 relaxation parameters are sensitive to the presence of cartilage degeneration. Both parameters may therefore support MRI evidence of cartilage defects of the hip.

AB - Objective To analyze region-specific T1ρ and T2 relaxation times of the hip joint cartilage in relation to presence or absence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and presence or absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected cartilage defects. Methods Weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRI studies of the hip were obtained from 84 volunteers. Based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scoring of the radiographs, 54 subjects were classified as healthy controls (K/L grade ≤1) and 30 were classified as having mild or moderate radiographic hip OA (K/L grades 2 or 3, respectively). Two-dimensional fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MRI sequences were used for semiquantitative clinical scoring of cartilage defects, and a T1ρ/T2 sequence was used to quantitatively assess the cartilage matrix. The femoral and acetabular cartilage was then segmented into 8 regions and the mean T1ρ/T2 values were calculated. Differences in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were compared between subjects with and those without radiographic hip OA, and those with and those without femoral or acetabular cartilage defects. Results Higher T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the anterior superior and central regions of the acetabular cartilage were seen in individuals with radiographic hip OA and those with acetabular cartilage defects compared to their respective controls (P<0.05). In the femoral cartilage, the differences in T1ρ and T2 were not significant for any of the comparisons. Significant differences in the T1ρ and T2 values (each P < 0.05) were found in more subregions of the cartilage and across the whole cartilage when subjects were stratified based on the presence of MRI-detected cartilage defects than when they were stratified based on the presence of radiographic hip OA. Conclusion T1ρ and T2 relaxation parameters are sensitive to the presence of cartilage degeneration. Both parameters may therefore support MRI evidence of cartilage defects of the hip.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929857290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929857290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/art.39074

DO - 10.1002/art.39074

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 1548

EP - 1556

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

IS - 6

ER -