Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): Effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment

Richard L Kravitz, Daniel J Tancredi, Tim Grennan, Donna Kalauokalani, Richard L. Street, Christina K. Slee, Theodore Wun, Jennifer Wright Oliver, Kate Lorig, Peter Franks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a lay-administered tailored education and coaching (TEC) intervention (aimed at reducing pain misconceptions and enhancing self-efficacy for communicating with physicians) on cancer pain severity, pain-related impairment, and quality of life. Cancer patients with baseline "worst pain" of ≥4 on a 0-10 scale or at least moderate functional impairment due to pain were randomly assigned to TEC or enhanced usual care (EUC) during a telephone interview conducted in advance of a planned oncology office visit (265 patients randomized to TEC or EUC; 258 completed at least one follow-up). Patients completed questionnaires before and after the visit and were interviewed by telephone at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Mixed effects regressions were used to evaluate the intervention adjusting for patient, practice, and site characteristics. Compared to EUC, TEC was associated with increased pain communication self-efficacy after the intervention (P < .001); both groups showed significant (P < .0001), similar, reductions in pain misconceptions. At 2 weeks, assignment to TEC was associated with improvement in pain-related impairment (-0.25 points on a 5-point scale, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to -0.06, P = .01) but not in pain severity (-0.21 points on an 11-point scale, -0.60 to 0.17, P = .27). The improvement in pain-related impairment was not sustained at 6 and 12 weeks. There were no significant intervention by subgroup interactions (P > .10). We conclude that TEC, compared with EUC, resulted in improved pain communication self-efficacy and temporary improvement in pain-related impairment, but no improvement in pain severity. Compared with control, tailored education and coaching for patients with cancer-related pain improved communication self-efficacy and reduced pain-related impairment in the short term but had no sustained benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1572-1582
Number of pages11
JournalPain
Volume152
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Education
Pain
Health
Self Efficacy
Neoplasms
Communication
Mentoring
Power (Psychology)
Office Visits
Patient Education
Telephone
Quality of Life
Interviews
Physicians

Keywords

  • Barriers to pain control
  • Cancer pain
  • Physician-patient communication
  • Psychoeducational interventions
  • Self-efficacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP) : Effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment. / Kravitz, Richard L; Tancredi, Daniel J; Grennan, Tim; Kalauokalani, Donna; Street, Richard L.; Slee, Christina K.; Wun, Theodore; Oliver, Jennifer Wright; Lorig, Kate; Franks, Peter.

In: Pain, Vol. 152, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 1572-1582.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kravitz, Richard L ; Tancredi, Daniel J ; Grennan, Tim ; Kalauokalani, Donna ; Street, Richard L. ; Slee, Christina K. ; Wun, Theodore ; Oliver, Jennifer Wright ; Lorig, Kate ; Franks, Peter. / Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP) : Effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment. In: Pain. 2011 ; Vol. 152, No. 7. pp. 1572-1582.
@article{db82f2d8847a4ca4bee1650a626d4fad,
title = "Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): Effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment",
abstract = "We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a lay-administered tailored education and coaching (TEC) intervention (aimed at reducing pain misconceptions and enhancing self-efficacy for communicating with physicians) on cancer pain severity, pain-related impairment, and quality of life. Cancer patients with baseline {"}worst pain{"} of ≥4 on a 0-10 scale or at least moderate functional impairment due to pain were randomly assigned to TEC or enhanced usual care (EUC) during a telephone interview conducted in advance of a planned oncology office visit (265 patients randomized to TEC or EUC; 258 completed at least one follow-up). Patients completed questionnaires before and after the visit and were interviewed by telephone at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Mixed effects regressions were used to evaluate the intervention adjusting for patient, practice, and site characteristics. Compared to EUC, TEC was associated with increased pain communication self-efficacy after the intervention (P < .001); both groups showed significant (P < .0001), similar, reductions in pain misconceptions. At 2 weeks, assignment to TEC was associated with improvement in pain-related impairment (-0.25 points on a 5-point scale, 95{\%} confidence interval -0.43 to -0.06, P = .01) but not in pain severity (-0.21 points on an 11-point scale, -0.60 to 0.17, P = .27). The improvement in pain-related impairment was not sustained at 6 and 12 weeks. There were no significant intervention by subgroup interactions (P > .10). We conclude that TEC, compared with EUC, resulted in improved pain communication self-efficacy and temporary improvement in pain-related impairment, but no improvement in pain severity. Compared with control, tailored education and coaching for patients with cancer-related pain improved communication self-efficacy and reduced pain-related impairment in the short term but had no sustained benefits.",
keywords = "Barriers to pain control, Cancer pain, Physician-patient communication, Psychoeducational interventions, Self-efficacy",
author = "Kravitz, {Richard L} and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and Tim Grennan and Donna Kalauokalani and Street, {Richard L.} and Slee, {Christina K.} and Theodore Wun and Oliver, {Jennifer Wright} and Kate Lorig and Peter Franks",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "1572--1582",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP)

T2 - Effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Grennan, Tim

AU - Kalauokalani, Donna

AU - Street, Richard L.

AU - Slee, Christina K.

AU - Wun, Theodore

AU - Oliver, Jennifer Wright

AU - Lorig, Kate

AU - Franks, Peter

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a lay-administered tailored education and coaching (TEC) intervention (aimed at reducing pain misconceptions and enhancing self-efficacy for communicating with physicians) on cancer pain severity, pain-related impairment, and quality of life. Cancer patients with baseline "worst pain" of ≥4 on a 0-10 scale or at least moderate functional impairment due to pain were randomly assigned to TEC or enhanced usual care (EUC) during a telephone interview conducted in advance of a planned oncology office visit (265 patients randomized to TEC or EUC; 258 completed at least one follow-up). Patients completed questionnaires before and after the visit and were interviewed by telephone at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Mixed effects regressions were used to evaluate the intervention adjusting for patient, practice, and site characteristics. Compared to EUC, TEC was associated with increased pain communication self-efficacy after the intervention (P < .001); both groups showed significant (P < .0001), similar, reductions in pain misconceptions. At 2 weeks, assignment to TEC was associated with improvement in pain-related impairment (-0.25 points on a 5-point scale, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to -0.06, P = .01) but not in pain severity (-0.21 points on an 11-point scale, -0.60 to 0.17, P = .27). The improvement in pain-related impairment was not sustained at 6 and 12 weeks. There were no significant intervention by subgroup interactions (P > .10). We conclude that TEC, compared with EUC, resulted in improved pain communication self-efficacy and temporary improvement in pain-related impairment, but no improvement in pain severity. Compared with control, tailored education and coaching for patients with cancer-related pain improved communication self-efficacy and reduced pain-related impairment in the short term but had no sustained benefits.

AB - We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a lay-administered tailored education and coaching (TEC) intervention (aimed at reducing pain misconceptions and enhancing self-efficacy for communicating with physicians) on cancer pain severity, pain-related impairment, and quality of life. Cancer patients with baseline "worst pain" of ≥4 on a 0-10 scale or at least moderate functional impairment due to pain were randomly assigned to TEC or enhanced usual care (EUC) during a telephone interview conducted in advance of a planned oncology office visit (265 patients randomized to TEC or EUC; 258 completed at least one follow-up). Patients completed questionnaires before and after the visit and were interviewed by telephone at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Mixed effects regressions were used to evaluate the intervention adjusting for patient, practice, and site characteristics. Compared to EUC, TEC was associated with increased pain communication self-efficacy after the intervention (P < .001); both groups showed significant (P < .0001), similar, reductions in pain misconceptions. At 2 weeks, assignment to TEC was associated with improvement in pain-related impairment (-0.25 points on a 5-point scale, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to -0.06, P = .01) but not in pain severity (-0.21 points on an 11-point scale, -0.60 to 0.17, P = .27). The improvement in pain-related impairment was not sustained at 6 and 12 weeks. There were no significant intervention by subgroup interactions (P > .10). We conclude that TEC, compared with EUC, resulted in improved pain communication self-efficacy and temporary improvement in pain-related impairment, but no improvement in pain severity. Compared with control, tailored education and coaching for patients with cancer-related pain improved communication self-efficacy and reduced pain-related impairment in the short term but had no sustained benefits.

KW - Barriers to pain control

KW - Cancer pain

KW - Physician-patient communication

KW - Psychoeducational interventions

KW - Self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958697717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958697717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.047

DO - 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 21439726

AN - SCOPUS:79958697717

VL - 152

SP - 1572

EP - 1582

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 7

ER -