Can we afford consumers choice in home care?

Carol L. McWilliam, Moira Stewart, Evelyn Vingilis, Catherine Ward-Griffin, Allan Donner, Karen Anderson, Jeffrey S Hoch, Peter Coyte, Gina Browne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As demands for home care escalate in a system concerned with cost containments, initiatives promoting client involvement in the management of their chronic illnesses and attendant services have attracted increasing attention. For longer term in-home care, varied approaches to case management reflect these trends. This article reports a study exploring the cost consequences of clients' choice of three approaches to case management within a single home care context. The first involved leaving the control of services and care to the system's case manager. The second option was to share this control in partnership with their in-home service providers. The third approach featured clients directing their own case management. Overall, the average costs per month of services for clients in the three groups did not differ significantly over 6 or more months. However, clients who chose direct involvement in their case management actually had significantly lower cost increases than clients with little control over their case management. While further investigation is needed, offering clients choice of involvement in their in-home case management may both lower costs and optimize clients' potential for involvement in their care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-178
Number of pages8
JournalCare Management Journals
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Case Management
Home Care Services
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost Control
Chronic Disease

Keywords

  • Case management
  • Client involvement
  • Consumer-driven costs
  • In-home service delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

McWilliam, C. L., Stewart, M., Vingilis, E., Ward-Griffin, C., Donner, A., Anderson, K., ... Browne, G. (2007). Can we afford consumers choice in home care? Care Management Journals, 8(4), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1891/152109807782590600

Can we afford consumers choice in home care? / McWilliam, Carol L.; Stewart, Moira; Vingilis, Evelyn; Ward-Griffin, Catherine; Donner, Allan; Anderson, Karen; Hoch, Jeffrey S; Coyte, Peter; Browne, Gina.

In: Care Management Journals, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, p. 171-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McWilliam, CL, Stewart, M, Vingilis, E, Ward-Griffin, C, Donner, A, Anderson, K, Hoch, JS, Coyte, P & Browne, G 2007, 'Can we afford consumers choice in home care?', Care Management Journals, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1891/152109807782590600
McWilliam CL, Stewart M, Vingilis E, Ward-Griffin C, Donner A, Anderson K et al. Can we afford consumers choice in home care? Care Management Journals. 2007;8(4):171-178. https://doi.org/10.1891/152109807782590600
McWilliam, Carol L. ; Stewart, Moira ; Vingilis, Evelyn ; Ward-Griffin, Catherine ; Donner, Allan ; Anderson, Karen ; Hoch, Jeffrey S ; Coyte, Peter ; Browne, Gina. / Can we afford consumers choice in home care?. In: Care Management Journals. 2007 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 171-178.
@article{8dda319803ef417895cba7ae9e49c682,
title = "Can we afford consumers choice in home care?",
abstract = "As demands for home care escalate in a system concerned with cost containments, initiatives promoting client involvement in the management of their chronic illnesses and attendant services have attracted increasing attention. For longer term in-home care, varied approaches to case management reflect these trends. This article reports a study exploring the cost consequences of clients' choice of three approaches to case management within a single home care context. The first involved leaving the control of services and care to the system's case manager. The second option was to share this control in partnership with their in-home service providers. The third approach featured clients directing their own case management. Overall, the average costs per month of services for clients in the three groups did not differ significantly over 6 or more months. However, clients who chose direct involvement in their case management actually had significantly lower cost increases than clients with little control over their case management. While further investigation is needed, offering clients choice of involvement in their in-home case management may both lower costs and optimize clients' potential for involvement in their care.",
keywords = "Case management, Client involvement, Consumer-driven costs, In-home service delivery",
author = "McWilliam, {Carol L.} and Moira Stewart and Evelyn Vingilis and Catherine Ward-Griffin and Allan Donner and Karen Anderson and Hoch, {Jeffrey S} and Peter Coyte and Gina Browne",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1891/152109807782590600",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "171--178",
journal = "The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal",
issn = "1521-0987",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we afford consumers choice in home care?

AU - McWilliam, Carol L.

AU - Stewart, Moira

AU - Vingilis, Evelyn

AU - Ward-Griffin, Catherine

AU - Donner, Allan

AU - Anderson, Karen

AU - Hoch, Jeffrey S

AU - Coyte, Peter

AU - Browne, Gina

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - As demands for home care escalate in a system concerned with cost containments, initiatives promoting client involvement in the management of their chronic illnesses and attendant services have attracted increasing attention. For longer term in-home care, varied approaches to case management reflect these trends. This article reports a study exploring the cost consequences of clients' choice of three approaches to case management within a single home care context. The first involved leaving the control of services and care to the system's case manager. The second option was to share this control in partnership with their in-home service providers. The third approach featured clients directing their own case management. Overall, the average costs per month of services for clients in the three groups did not differ significantly over 6 or more months. However, clients who chose direct involvement in their case management actually had significantly lower cost increases than clients with little control over their case management. While further investigation is needed, offering clients choice of involvement in their in-home case management may both lower costs and optimize clients' potential for involvement in their care.

AB - As demands for home care escalate in a system concerned with cost containments, initiatives promoting client involvement in the management of their chronic illnesses and attendant services have attracted increasing attention. For longer term in-home care, varied approaches to case management reflect these trends. This article reports a study exploring the cost consequences of clients' choice of three approaches to case management within a single home care context. The first involved leaving the control of services and care to the system's case manager. The second option was to share this control in partnership with their in-home service providers. The third approach featured clients directing their own case management. Overall, the average costs per month of services for clients in the three groups did not differ significantly over 6 or more months. However, clients who chose direct involvement in their case management actually had significantly lower cost increases than clients with little control over their case management. While further investigation is needed, offering clients choice of involvement in their in-home case management may both lower costs and optimize clients' potential for involvement in their care.

KW - Case management

KW - Client involvement

KW - Consumer-driven costs

KW - In-home service delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749143909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749143909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1891/152109807782590600

DO - 10.1891/152109807782590600

M3 - Article

C2 - 18236956

AN - SCOPUS:39749143909

VL - 8

SP - 171

EP - 178

JO - The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal

JF - The Journal of long term home health care : The PRIDE Institute journal

SN - 1521-0987

IS - 4

ER -