California Public Opinion On Health Professionals Talking With Patients About Firearms

Rocco Pallin, Amanda Charbonneau, Garen J. Wintemute, Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Medical and public health organizations have recommended that health professionals discuss firearm safety with patients at risk for gun-related injury, yet few health professionals do so. Concerns that patients may view conversations about firearms as inappropriate have been reported in prior studies. Using state-representative data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, this study found that most Californians report gun safety conversations with health professionals to be at least sometimes appropriate when these conversations involved a patient who had a known risk factor for firearm-related harm (depending on the risk factor, 83.7-90.2 percent among all respondents and 70.0-91.2 percent among firearm owners). Majorities of respondents also found intervention by health professionals for those at imminent risk to be at least sometimes appropriate (depending on the intervention, 84.0-89.9 percent among all respondents and 82.6-91.0 percent among firearm owners). These findings can inform health policy and education on clinical strategies for preventing firearm-related harm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1744-1751
Number of pages8
JournalHealth affairs (Project Hope)
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

Public Opinion
Firearms
Health
Safety
Patient Safety
Health Policy
Health Education
Public Health
Organizations
Surveys and Questionnaires
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Children’s health
  • Firearms
  • Gun safety
  • Guns
  • Health care providers
  • Health policy
  • Mental health
  • Patient harm
  • Patients
  • Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

California Public Opinion On Health Professionals Talking With Patients About Firearms. / Pallin, Rocco; Charbonneau, Amanda; Wintemute, Garen J.; Kravitz-Wirtz, Nicole.

In: Health affairs (Project Hope), Vol. 38, No. 10, 01.10.2019, p. 1744-1751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pallin, Rocco ; Charbonneau, Amanda ; Wintemute, Garen J. ; Kravitz-Wirtz, Nicole. / California Public Opinion On Health Professionals Talking With Patients About Firearms. In: Health affairs (Project Hope). 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 10. pp. 1744-1751.
@article{1abdad08fadc4bd9a7b2e4cff7fc1b83,
title = "California Public Opinion On Health Professionals Talking With Patients About Firearms",
abstract = "Medical and public health organizations have recommended that health professionals discuss firearm safety with patients at risk for gun-related injury, yet few health professionals do so. Concerns that patients may view conversations about firearms as inappropriate have been reported in prior studies. Using state-representative data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, this study found that most Californians report gun safety conversations with health professionals to be at least sometimes appropriate when these conversations involved a patient who had a known risk factor for firearm-related harm (depending on the risk factor, 83.7-90.2 percent among all respondents and 70.0-91.2 percent among firearm owners). Majorities of respondents also found intervention by health professionals for those at imminent risk to be at least sometimes appropriate (depending on the intervention, 84.0-89.9 percent among all respondents and 82.6-91.0 percent among firearm owners). These findings can inform health policy and education on clinical strategies for preventing firearm-related harm.",
keywords = "Children’s health, Firearms, Gun safety, Guns, Health care providers, Health policy, Mental health, Patient harm, Patients, Violence",
author = "Rocco Pallin and Amanda Charbonneau and Wintemute, {Garen J.} and Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1744--1751",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - California Public Opinion On Health Professionals Talking With Patients About Firearms

AU - Pallin, Rocco

AU - Charbonneau, Amanda

AU - Wintemute, Garen J.

AU - Kravitz-Wirtz, Nicole

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - Medical and public health organizations have recommended that health professionals discuss firearm safety with patients at risk for gun-related injury, yet few health professionals do so. Concerns that patients may view conversations about firearms as inappropriate have been reported in prior studies. Using state-representative data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, this study found that most Californians report gun safety conversations with health professionals to be at least sometimes appropriate when these conversations involved a patient who had a known risk factor for firearm-related harm (depending on the risk factor, 83.7-90.2 percent among all respondents and 70.0-91.2 percent among firearm owners). Majorities of respondents also found intervention by health professionals for those at imminent risk to be at least sometimes appropriate (depending on the intervention, 84.0-89.9 percent among all respondents and 82.6-91.0 percent among firearm owners). These findings can inform health policy and education on clinical strategies for preventing firearm-related harm.

AB - Medical and public health organizations have recommended that health professionals discuss firearm safety with patients at risk for gun-related injury, yet few health professionals do so. Concerns that patients may view conversations about firearms as inappropriate have been reported in prior studies. Using state-representative data from the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey, this study found that most Californians report gun safety conversations with health professionals to be at least sometimes appropriate when these conversations involved a patient who had a known risk factor for firearm-related harm (depending on the risk factor, 83.7-90.2 percent among all respondents and 70.0-91.2 percent among firearm owners). Majorities of respondents also found intervention by health professionals for those at imminent risk to be at least sometimes appropriate (depending on the intervention, 84.0-89.9 percent among all respondents and 82.6-91.0 percent among firearm owners). These findings can inform health policy and education on clinical strategies for preventing firearm-related harm.

KW - Children’s health

KW - Firearms

KW - Gun safety

KW - Guns

KW - Health care providers

KW - Health policy

KW - Mental health

KW - Patient harm

KW - Patients

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072981016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072981016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00602

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00602

M3 - Article

C2 - 31589535

AN - SCOPUS:85072981016

VL - 38

SP - 1744

EP - 1751

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 10

ER -