Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis

Cynthia Delgado, Patricia Ward, Glenn M. Chertow, Lindsey Storer, Lorien Dalrymple, Torin Block, George Kaysen, John Kornak, Barbara Grimes, Nancy G. Kutner, Kirsten L. Johansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Estimating dietary intake is challenging in patients with chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to calibrate the Block Brief 2000 food frequency questionnaire (BFFQ) using 3-day food diary records among patients on dialysis. Methods: Data from 3-day food diary records from 146 patients new to dialysis were reviewed and entered into National Cancer Institute self-administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24), a web-based dietary interview system. The information was then re-entered omitting foods reported in the diaries that were not in the BFFQ to generate a "BFFQ-restricted" set of intakes. We modeled each major dietary component (i.e., energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, fat) separately using linear regression. The main independent variables were BFFQ-restricted food diary estimates computed as the average of the 3 days of diaries, restricted to items included in the BFFQ, with the unrestricted 3-day food diary averages as dependent variables. Results: The BFFQ-restricted diary energy estimate of 1,325±545kcal was 87% of the energy intake in the full food diary (1,510.3±510.4, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted diary carbohydrate intake was 83% of the full food diary (156.7±78.7g vs. 190.4±72.7, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted fat intake was 90% of the full-diary-reported fat intake (50.1±24.1g vs. 56.4±21.6g, P < .0001). Daily protein intake assessments were not statistically different by BFFQ-restricted diary and full diary assessment (63.1±28.5 vs. 64.1±21.4g, P = .60). The associations between BFFQ-restricted diary intake and unrestricted intake were linear. Three-day diary-reported intake could be estimated from BFFQ-restricted intake with r2 ranging from 0.36 to 0.56 (P < .0001 for energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, and fat). Final equations did not include adjustments for age, sex, or race because the patterns of associations were not significantly different. Conclusion: Energy and macronutrient estimates by BFFQ are lower than estimates from 3-day food diaries, but simple calibration equations can be used to approximate total intake from BFFQ responses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Renal Nutrition
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Calibration
Dialysis
Diet Records
Food
Fats
Carbohydrates
Surveys and Questionnaires
Proteins
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Energy Intake
Linear Models
Chronic Disease
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Nephrology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Delgado, C., Ward, P., Chertow, G. M., Storer, L., Dalrymple, L., Block, T., ... Johansen, K. L. (2014). Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis. Journal of Renal Nutrition, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2013.12.004

Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis. / Delgado, Cynthia; Ward, Patricia; Chertow, Glenn M.; Storer, Lindsey; Dalrymple, Lorien; Block, Torin; Kaysen, George; Kornak, John; Grimes, Barbara; Kutner, Nancy G.; Johansen, Kirsten L.

In: Journal of Renal Nutrition, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delgado, C, Ward, P, Chertow, GM, Storer, L, Dalrymple, L, Block, T, Kaysen, G, Kornak, J, Grimes, B, Kutner, NG & Johansen, KL 2014, 'Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis', Journal of Renal Nutrition, vol. 24, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2013.12.004
Delgado, Cynthia ; Ward, Patricia ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Storer, Lindsey ; Dalrymple, Lorien ; Block, Torin ; Kaysen, George ; Kornak, John ; Grimes, Barbara ; Kutner, Nancy G. ; Johansen, Kirsten L. / Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis. In: Journal of Renal Nutrition. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 3.
@article{3c4ae4b0059344ffa53c4c50f60feda7,
title = "Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis",
abstract = "Objective: Estimating dietary intake is challenging in patients with chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to calibrate the Block Brief 2000 food frequency questionnaire (BFFQ) using 3-day food diary records among patients on dialysis. Methods: Data from 3-day food diary records from 146 patients new to dialysis were reviewed and entered into National Cancer Institute self-administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24), a web-based dietary interview system. The information was then re-entered omitting foods reported in the diaries that were not in the BFFQ to generate a {"}BFFQ-restricted{"} set of intakes. We modeled each major dietary component (i.e., energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, fat) separately using linear regression. The main independent variables were BFFQ-restricted food diary estimates computed as the average of the 3 days of diaries, restricted to items included in the BFFQ, with the unrestricted 3-day food diary averages as dependent variables. Results: The BFFQ-restricted diary energy estimate of 1,325±545kcal was 87{\%} of the energy intake in the full food diary (1,510.3±510.4, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted diary carbohydrate intake was 83{\%} of the full food diary (156.7±78.7g vs. 190.4±72.7, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted fat intake was 90{\%} of the full-diary-reported fat intake (50.1±24.1g vs. 56.4±21.6g, P < .0001). Daily protein intake assessments were not statistically different by BFFQ-restricted diary and full diary assessment (63.1±28.5 vs. 64.1±21.4g, P = .60). The associations between BFFQ-restricted diary intake and unrestricted intake were linear. Three-day diary-reported intake could be estimated from BFFQ-restricted intake with r2 ranging from 0.36 to 0.56 (P < .0001 for energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, and fat). Final equations did not include adjustments for age, sex, or race because the patterns of associations were not significantly different. Conclusion: Energy and macronutrient estimates by BFFQ are lower than estimates from 3-day food diaries, but simple calibration equations can be used to approximate total intake from BFFQ responses.",
author = "Cynthia Delgado and Patricia Ward and Chertow, {Glenn M.} and Lindsey Storer and Lorien Dalrymple and Torin Block and George Kaysen and John Kornak and Barbara Grimes and Kutner, {Nancy G.} and Johansen, {Kirsten L.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1053/j.jrn.2013.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
journal = "Journal of Renal Nutrition",
issn = "1051-2276",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calibration of the brief food frequency questionnaire among patients on dialysis

AU - Delgado, Cynthia

AU - Ward, Patricia

AU - Chertow, Glenn M.

AU - Storer, Lindsey

AU - Dalrymple, Lorien

AU - Block, Torin

AU - Kaysen, George

AU - Kornak, John

AU - Grimes, Barbara

AU - Kutner, Nancy G.

AU - Johansen, Kirsten L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: Estimating dietary intake is challenging in patients with chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to calibrate the Block Brief 2000 food frequency questionnaire (BFFQ) using 3-day food diary records among patients on dialysis. Methods: Data from 3-day food diary records from 146 patients new to dialysis were reviewed and entered into National Cancer Institute self-administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24), a web-based dietary interview system. The information was then re-entered omitting foods reported in the diaries that were not in the BFFQ to generate a "BFFQ-restricted" set of intakes. We modeled each major dietary component (i.e., energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, fat) separately using linear regression. The main independent variables were BFFQ-restricted food diary estimates computed as the average of the 3 days of diaries, restricted to items included in the BFFQ, with the unrestricted 3-day food diary averages as dependent variables. Results: The BFFQ-restricted diary energy estimate of 1,325±545kcal was 87% of the energy intake in the full food diary (1,510.3±510.4, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted diary carbohydrate intake was 83% of the full food diary (156.7±78.7g vs. 190.4±72.7, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted fat intake was 90% of the full-diary-reported fat intake (50.1±24.1g vs. 56.4±21.6g, P < .0001). Daily protein intake assessments were not statistically different by BFFQ-restricted diary and full diary assessment (63.1±28.5 vs. 64.1±21.4g, P = .60). The associations between BFFQ-restricted diary intake and unrestricted intake were linear. Three-day diary-reported intake could be estimated from BFFQ-restricted intake with r2 ranging from 0.36 to 0.56 (P < .0001 for energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, and fat). Final equations did not include adjustments for age, sex, or race because the patterns of associations were not significantly different. Conclusion: Energy and macronutrient estimates by BFFQ are lower than estimates from 3-day food diaries, but simple calibration equations can be used to approximate total intake from BFFQ responses.

AB - Objective: Estimating dietary intake is challenging in patients with chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to calibrate the Block Brief 2000 food frequency questionnaire (BFFQ) using 3-day food diary records among patients on dialysis. Methods: Data from 3-day food diary records from 146 patients new to dialysis were reviewed and entered into National Cancer Institute self-administered 24-hour dietary recall (ASA24), a web-based dietary interview system. The information was then re-entered omitting foods reported in the diaries that were not in the BFFQ to generate a "BFFQ-restricted" set of intakes. We modeled each major dietary component (i.e., energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, fat) separately using linear regression. The main independent variables were BFFQ-restricted food diary estimates computed as the average of the 3 days of diaries, restricted to items included in the BFFQ, with the unrestricted 3-day food diary averages as dependent variables. Results: The BFFQ-restricted diary energy estimate of 1,325±545kcal was 87% of the energy intake in the full food diary (1,510.3±510.4, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted diary carbohydrate intake was 83% of the full food diary (156.7±78.7g vs. 190.4±72.7, P < .0001). The BFFQ-restricted fat intake was 90% of the full-diary-reported fat intake (50.1±24.1g vs. 56.4±21.6g, P < .0001). Daily protein intake assessments were not statistically different by BFFQ-restricted diary and full diary assessment (63.1±28.5 vs. 64.1±21.4g, P = .60). The associations between BFFQ-restricted diary intake and unrestricted intake were linear. Three-day diary-reported intake could be estimated from BFFQ-restricted intake with r2 ranging from 0.36 to 0.56 (P < .0001 for energy [total calories], protein, carbohydrate, and fat). Final equations did not include adjustments for age, sex, or race because the patterns of associations were not significantly different. Conclusion: Energy and macronutrient estimates by BFFQ are lower than estimates from 3-day food diaries, but simple calibration equations can be used to approximate total intake from BFFQ responses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899105964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899105964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jrn.2013.12.004

DO - 10.1053/j.jrn.2013.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 24613023

AN - SCOPUS:84899105964

VL - 24

JO - Journal of Renal Nutrition

JF - Journal of Renal Nutrition

SN - 1051-2276

IS - 3

ER -