Cage Versus Noncage Laying-Hen Housings: Respiratory Exposures

Veronica Arteaga, Diane Mitchell, Tracey Armitage, Daniel Tancredi, Marc Schenker, Frank Mitloehner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the personal respiratory exposures of poultry workers in three different types of layer housing under commercial production conditions. Workers were randomly assigned to each of conventional cage, enriched cage, and aviary barns in a crossover repeated-measures design for three observation periods over the hens’ lifetime. Inhalable and fine particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin in both size fractions were assessed by personal and area samplers over the work shift. Concentrations of inhalable PM, PM<inf>2.5</inf> (PM with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm), and endotoxin in both size fractions were higher in aviary than either the conventional or enriched barns. Geometric means (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of inhalable PM and endotoxin for the aviary, conventional, and enriched barns were 8.9 (6.8–11.5) mg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7517.9 (5403.2–10,460.2) EU/m<sup>3</sup>, 3.7 (2.8–4.8) mg/m<sup>3</sup> and 1655.7 (1144.6–2395.2) EU/m<sup>3</sup>, 2.4 (1.8–3.3) mg/m<sup>3</sup> and 1404.8 (983.3–2007.0) EU/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Area samplers recorded a lower mean inhalable PM concentration and higher PM<inf>2.5</inf> concentration than personal samplers. Ammonia concentrations were low throughout three monitoring seasons. These findings show that the aviary barns pose higher respiratory exposures to poultry workers than either conventional or enriched barns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-255
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Agromedicine
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2015

Fingerprint

Particulate Matter
Poultry
Ammonia
Endotoxins
Observation

Keywords

  • Bioaerosols
  • confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs)
  • endotoxin
  • particulate matter
  • poultry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Cage Versus Noncage Laying-Hen Housings : Respiratory Exposures. / Arteaga, Veronica; Mitchell, Diane; Armitage, Tracey; Tancredi, Daniel; Schenker, Marc; Mitloehner, Frank.

In: Journal of Agromedicine, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.07.2015, p. 245-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arteaga, Veronica ; Mitchell, Diane ; Armitage, Tracey ; Tancredi, Daniel ; Schenker, Marc ; Mitloehner, Frank. / Cage Versus Noncage Laying-Hen Housings : Respiratory Exposures. In: Journal of Agromedicine. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 245-255.
@article{4b61b61008e7437bbe1a7f42e7763644,
title = "Cage Versus Noncage Laying-Hen Housings: Respiratory Exposures",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the personal respiratory exposures of poultry workers in three different types of layer housing under commercial production conditions. Workers were randomly assigned to each of conventional cage, enriched cage, and aviary barns in a crossover repeated-measures design for three observation periods over the hens’ lifetime. Inhalable and fine particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin in both size fractions were assessed by personal and area samplers over the work shift. Concentrations of inhalable PM, PM2.5 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm), and endotoxin in both size fractions were higher in aviary than either the conventional or enriched barns. Geometric means (95{\%} confidence intervals [CIs]) of inhalable PM and endotoxin for the aviary, conventional, and enriched barns were 8.9 (6.8–11.5) mg/m3 and 7517.9 (5403.2–10,460.2) EU/m3, 3.7 (2.8–4.8) mg/m3 and 1655.7 (1144.6–2395.2) EU/m3, 2.4 (1.8–3.3) mg/m3 and 1404.8 (983.3–2007.0) EU/m3, respectively. Area samplers recorded a lower mean inhalable PM concentration and higher PM2.5 concentration than personal samplers. Ammonia concentrations were low throughout three monitoring seasons. These findings show that the aviary barns pose higher respiratory exposures to poultry workers than either conventional or enriched barns.",
keywords = "Bioaerosols, confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs), endotoxin, particulate matter, poultry",
author = "Veronica Arteaga and Diane Mitchell and Tracey Armitage and Daniel Tancredi and Marc Schenker and Frank Mitloehner",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/1059924X.2015.1044681",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "245--255",
journal = "Journal of Agromedicine",
issn = "1059-924X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cage Versus Noncage Laying-Hen Housings

T2 - Respiratory Exposures

AU - Arteaga, Veronica

AU - Mitchell, Diane

AU - Armitage, Tracey

AU - Tancredi, Daniel

AU - Schenker, Marc

AU - Mitloehner, Frank

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the personal respiratory exposures of poultry workers in three different types of layer housing under commercial production conditions. Workers were randomly assigned to each of conventional cage, enriched cage, and aviary barns in a crossover repeated-measures design for three observation periods over the hens’ lifetime. Inhalable and fine particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin in both size fractions were assessed by personal and area samplers over the work shift. Concentrations of inhalable PM, PM2.5 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm), and endotoxin in both size fractions were higher in aviary than either the conventional or enriched barns. Geometric means (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of inhalable PM and endotoxin for the aviary, conventional, and enriched barns were 8.9 (6.8–11.5) mg/m3 and 7517.9 (5403.2–10,460.2) EU/m3, 3.7 (2.8–4.8) mg/m3 and 1655.7 (1144.6–2395.2) EU/m3, 2.4 (1.8–3.3) mg/m3 and 1404.8 (983.3–2007.0) EU/m3, respectively. Area samplers recorded a lower mean inhalable PM concentration and higher PM2.5 concentration than personal samplers. Ammonia concentrations were low throughout three monitoring seasons. These findings show that the aviary barns pose higher respiratory exposures to poultry workers than either conventional or enriched barns.

AB - ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the personal respiratory exposures of poultry workers in three different types of layer housing under commercial production conditions. Workers were randomly assigned to each of conventional cage, enriched cage, and aviary barns in a crossover repeated-measures design for three observation periods over the hens’ lifetime. Inhalable and fine particulate matter (PM) and endotoxin in both size fractions were assessed by personal and area samplers over the work shift. Concentrations of inhalable PM, PM2.5 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm), and endotoxin in both size fractions were higher in aviary than either the conventional or enriched barns. Geometric means (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of inhalable PM and endotoxin for the aviary, conventional, and enriched barns were 8.9 (6.8–11.5) mg/m3 and 7517.9 (5403.2–10,460.2) EU/m3, 3.7 (2.8–4.8) mg/m3 and 1655.7 (1144.6–2395.2) EU/m3, 2.4 (1.8–3.3) mg/m3 and 1404.8 (983.3–2007.0) EU/m3, respectively. Area samplers recorded a lower mean inhalable PM concentration and higher PM2.5 concentration than personal samplers. Ammonia concentrations were low throughout three monitoring seasons. These findings show that the aviary barns pose higher respiratory exposures to poultry workers than either conventional or enriched barns.

KW - Bioaerosols

KW - confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs)

KW - endotoxin

KW - particulate matter

KW - poultry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938587632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938587632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1044681

DO - 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1044681

M3 - Article

C2 - 26237714

VL - 20

SP - 245

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Agromedicine

JF - Journal of Agromedicine

SN - 1059-924X

IS - 3

ER -