Burn resuscitation: The results of the ISBI/ABA survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: There are valid concerns that burn shock resuscitation is inadequate; a tendency to over-resuscitate the patient seems to exist which may increase complications such as compartment syndrome. The purpose of this study was to survey members of the ISBI and ABA to determine current practices of burn resuscitation. Methods: A survey asking for practices of burn shock resuscitation was provided to all participants of a recent ABA meeting. Around the same time, the survey was sent to all members of the ISBI through the internet. The results of the 101 respondents (ABA - 59, ISBI - 42, approximately a 15% response rate) are described. Results: Surveys were returned from all the continents except Africa. Respondents included directors (48%), staff physicians (19%), nurses (23%) and others. Most programs admitted adults (87%) and children (75%) with a mean of 289 admissions per year. The cut off to initiate resuscitation was 15% TBSA and most preferred peripheral IVs (70%) and central lines (47.5%). The Parkland formula was preferred (69.3%) while others were used: Brooke - 6.9%, Galveston - 8.9%, Warden - 5.9%, and colloid 11.9%. Lactated Ringer's (LR) was the preferred solution (91.9%), followed by normal saline - 5%, hypertonic saline - 4%, albumin - 20.8%. FFP - 13.9%, and LR/NaHCO3 - 12.9%. Approximately half (49.5%) added colloid before 24 h. Urine output is the major indicator of success (94.9%) while 22.7% use other monitors. Most (88.8%) feel their protocols work well with 69.8% feel that it provides the right amount of fluid (24% - too much, 7% - too little). Despite this feeling, they still feel that they give more fluid than the formula in 55.1%, less than formula in 12.4% and the right amount in 32.6%. Approximately 1/3 use an oral resuscitation formula and 81.8% feel that an oral formula works for burns < 15% TBSA. Conclusion: Large variations exist in resuscitation protocols but the Parkland formula using LR is still the dominant method. Most feel that their resuscitation protocol works well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-182
Number of pages7
JournalBurns
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Colloids
Shock
Compartment Syndromes
Surveys and Questionnaires
Burns
Internet
Albumins
Emotions
Nurses
Urine
Physicians
Ringer's lactate

Keywords

  • Burns
  • Resuscitation
  • Shock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Burn resuscitation : The results of the ISBI/ABA survey. / Greenhalgh, David G.

In: Burns, Vol. 36, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 176-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c189eae120a42c9b34bf0a3761eb500,
title = "Burn resuscitation: The results of the ISBI/ABA survey",
abstract = "Introduction: There are valid concerns that burn shock resuscitation is inadequate; a tendency to over-resuscitate the patient seems to exist which may increase complications such as compartment syndrome. The purpose of this study was to survey members of the ISBI and ABA to determine current practices of burn resuscitation. Methods: A survey asking for practices of burn shock resuscitation was provided to all participants of a recent ABA meeting. Around the same time, the survey was sent to all members of the ISBI through the internet. The results of the 101 respondents (ABA - 59, ISBI - 42, approximately a 15{\%} response rate) are described. Results: Surveys were returned from all the continents except Africa. Respondents included directors (48{\%}), staff physicians (19{\%}), nurses (23{\%}) and others. Most programs admitted adults (87{\%}) and children (75{\%}) with a mean of 289 admissions per year. The cut off to initiate resuscitation was 15{\%} TBSA and most preferred peripheral IVs (70{\%}) and central lines (47.5{\%}). The Parkland formula was preferred (69.3{\%}) while others were used: Brooke - 6.9{\%}, Galveston - 8.9{\%}, Warden - 5.9{\%}, and colloid 11.9{\%}. Lactated Ringer's (LR) was the preferred solution (91.9{\%}), followed by normal saline - 5{\%}, hypertonic saline - 4{\%}, albumin - 20.8{\%}. FFP - 13.9{\%}, and LR/NaHCO3 - 12.9{\%}. Approximately half (49.5{\%}) added colloid before 24 h. Urine output is the major indicator of success (94.9{\%}) while 22.7{\%} use other monitors. Most (88.8{\%}) feel their protocols work well with 69.8{\%} feel that it provides the right amount of fluid (24{\%} - too much, 7{\%} - too little). Despite this feeling, they still feel that they give more fluid than the formula in 55.1{\%}, less than formula in 12.4{\%} and the right amount in 32.6{\%}. Approximately 1/3 use an oral resuscitation formula and 81.8{\%} feel that an oral formula works for burns < 15{\%} TBSA. Conclusion: Large variations exist in resuscitation protocols but the Parkland formula using LR is still the dominant method. Most feel that their resuscitation protocol works well.",
keywords = "Burns, Resuscitation, Shock",
author = "Greenhalgh, {David G}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2009.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "176--182",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Burn resuscitation

T2 - The results of the ISBI/ABA survey

AU - Greenhalgh, David G

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Introduction: There are valid concerns that burn shock resuscitation is inadequate; a tendency to over-resuscitate the patient seems to exist which may increase complications such as compartment syndrome. The purpose of this study was to survey members of the ISBI and ABA to determine current practices of burn resuscitation. Methods: A survey asking for practices of burn shock resuscitation was provided to all participants of a recent ABA meeting. Around the same time, the survey was sent to all members of the ISBI through the internet. The results of the 101 respondents (ABA - 59, ISBI - 42, approximately a 15% response rate) are described. Results: Surveys were returned from all the continents except Africa. Respondents included directors (48%), staff physicians (19%), nurses (23%) and others. Most programs admitted adults (87%) and children (75%) with a mean of 289 admissions per year. The cut off to initiate resuscitation was 15% TBSA and most preferred peripheral IVs (70%) and central lines (47.5%). The Parkland formula was preferred (69.3%) while others were used: Brooke - 6.9%, Galveston - 8.9%, Warden - 5.9%, and colloid 11.9%. Lactated Ringer's (LR) was the preferred solution (91.9%), followed by normal saline - 5%, hypertonic saline - 4%, albumin - 20.8%. FFP - 13.9%, and LR/NaHCO3 - 12.9%. Approximately half (49.5%) added colloid before 24 h. Urine output is the major indicator of success (94.9%) while 22.7% use other monitors. Most (88.8%) feel their protocols work well with 69.8% feel that it provides the right amount of fluid (24% - too much, 7% - too little). Despite this feeling, they still feel that they give more fluid than the formula in 55.1%, less than formula in 12.4% and the right amount in 32.6%. Approximately 1/3 use an oral resuscitation formula and 81.8% feel that an oral formula works for burns < 15% TBSA. Conclusion: Large variations exist in resuscitation protocols but the Parkland formula using LR is still the dominant method. Most feel that their resuscitation protocol works well.

AB - Introduction: There are valid concerns that burn shock resuscitation is inadequate; a tendency to over-resuscitate the patient seems to exist which may increase complications such as compartment syndrome. The purpose of this study was to survey members of the ISBI and ABA to determine current practices of burn resuscitation. Methods: A survey asking for practices of burn shock resuscitation was provided to all participants of a recent ABA meeting. Around the same time, the survey was sent to all members of the ISBI through the internet. The results of the 101 respondents (ABA - 59, ISBI - 42, approximately a 15% response rate) are described. Results: Surveys were returned from all the continents except Africa. Respondents included directors (48%), staff physicians (19%), nurses (23%) and others. Most programs admitted adults (87%) and children (75%) with a mean of 289 admissions per year. The cut off to initiate resuscitation was 15% TBSA and most preferred peripheral IVs (70%) and central lines (47.5%). The Parkland formula was preferred (69.3%) while others were used: Brooke - 6.9%, Galveston - 8.9%, Warden - 5.9%, and colloid 11.9%. Lactated Ringer's (LR) was the preferred solution (91.9%), followed by normal saline - 5%, hypertonic saline - 4%, albumin - 20.8%. FFP - 13.9%, and LR/NaHCO3 - 12.9%. Approximately half (49.5%) added colloid before 24 h. Urine output is the major indicator of success (94.9%) while 22.7% use other monitors. Most (88.8%) feel their protocols work well with 69.8% feel that it provides the right amount of fluid (24% - too much, 7% - too little). Despite this feeling, they still feel that they give more fluid than the formula in 55.1%, less than formula in 12.4% and the right amount in 32.6%. Approximately 1/3 use an oral resuscitation formula and 81.8% feel that an oral formula works for burns < 15% TBSA. Conclusion: Large variations exist in resuscitation protocols but the Parkland formula using LR is still the dominant method. Most feel that their resuscitation protocol works well.

KW - Burns

KW - Resuscitation

KW - Shock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76349084044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76349084044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2009.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2009.09.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 20018451

AN - SCOPUS:76349084044

VL - 36

SP - 176

EP - 182

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 2

ER -