Brown v. Plata: Prison overcrowding in California

William J. Newman, Charles L Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

California's prisons are currently designed to house approximately 85,000 inmates. At the time of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. Plata, the California prison system housed nearly twice that many (approximately 156,000 inmates). The Supreme Court held that California's prison system violated inmates' Eighth Amendment rights. The Court upheld a three-judge panel's order to decrease the population of California's prisons by an estimated 46,000 inmates. They determined that overcrowding was the primary cause of the inmates' inadequate medical and mental health care. As a result, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has been working to redistribute inmates and parolees safely and decrease the overall population to the mandated levels. These large-scale adjustments to California's penal system create potential opportunities to study the long-term effects on affected inmates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)547-552
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume40
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Prisons
Population Dynamics
Supreme Court Decisions
Social Adjustment
Mental Health
Rehabilitation
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Brown v. Plata : Prison overcrowding in California. / Newman, William J.; Scott, Charles L.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2012, p. 547-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8af07c931e154284bdd6cd4959cd1bf0,
title = "Brown v. Plata: Prison overcrowding in California",
abstract = "California's prisons are currently designed to house approximately 85,000 inmates. At the time of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. Plata, the California prison system housed nearly twice that many (approximately 156,000 inmates). The Supreme Court held that California's prison system violated inmates' Eighth Amendment rights. The Court upheld a three-judge panel's order to decrease the population of California's prisons by an estimated 46,000 inmates. They determined that overcrowding was the primary cause of the inmates' inadequate medical and mental health care. As a result, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has been working to redistribute inmates and parolees safely and decrease the overall population to the mandated levels. These large-scale adjustments to California's penal system create potential opportunities to study the long-term effects on affected inmates.",
author = "Newman, {William J.} and Scott, {Charles L}",
year = "2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "547--552",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brown v. Plata

T2 - Prison overcrowding in California

AU - Newman, William J.

AU - Scott, Charles L

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - California's prisons are currently designed to house approximately 85,000 inmates. At the time of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. Plata, the California prison system housed nearly twice that many (approximately 156,000 inmates). The Supreme Court held that California's prison system violated inmates' Eighth Amendment rights. The Court upheld a three-judge panel's order to decrease the population of California's prisons by an estimated 46,000 inmates. They determined that overcrowding was the primary cause of the inmates' inadequate medical and mental health care. As a result, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has been working to redistribute inmates and parolees safely and decrease the overall population to the mandated levels. These large-scale adjustments to California's penal system create potential opportunities to study the long-term effects on affected inmates.

AB - California's prisons are currently designed to house approximately 85,000 inmates. At the time of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. Plata, the California prison system housed nearly twice that many (approximately 156,000 inmates). The Supreme Court held that California's prison system violated inmates' Eighth Amendment rights. The Court upheld a three-judge panel's order to decrease the population of California's prisons by an estimated 46,000 inmates. They determined that overcrowding was the primary cause of the inmates' inadequate medical and mental health care. As a result, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) has been working to redistribute inmates and parolees safely and decrease the overall population to the mandated levels. These large-scale adjustments to California's penal system create potential opportunities to study the long-term effects on affected inmates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871421960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871421960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23233477

AN - SCOPUS:84871421960

VL - 40

SP - 547

EP - 552

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 4

ER -