Bronchogenic carcinoma

Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery

W. R. Webb, B. G. Jensen, R. Sollitto, G. de Geer, M. McCowin, G. Gamsu, Elizabeth H Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty-three patients suspected of having bronchogenic carcinoma were studied prospectively using magnetic resonance (MR). In this group, 30 underwent examination with computed tomography (CT), 15 underwent thoracotomy, six had mediastinal biopsy procedures performed, and eight underwent bronchoscopy. MR studies, which included transaxial spin-echo imaging (TR, 0.5 and 2.0 sec; TE, 28 and 56 msec) of all patients and sagittal or coronal imaging of 18, were performed without knowledge of CT findings, using only plain radiographs as a guide. CT and MR studies were interpreted separately. CT and MR provided comparable information regarding the presence and size of mediastinal lymph nodes. MR better discriminated mediastinal nodes from vascular structures. However, in two of 11 patients who had multipe mediastinal lymph nodes that were normal in size at CT examination and surgery, MR suggested a confluent abnormal mass, probably because of its poorer spatial resolution. MR was superior to CT in showing enlarged hilar lymph nodes, but CT was better for demonstrating bronchial abnormalities. In three of four patients who had a proved hilar mass with distal obstructive pneumonia, MR (TR, 2.0 sec) helped distinguish between the mass and collapsed lung.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-124
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume156
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bronchogenic Carcinoma
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Tomography
Lymph Nodes
Bronchoscopy
Thoracotomy
Blood Vessels
Pneumonia
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Biopsy
Lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Webb, W. R., Jensen, B. G., Sollitto, R., de Geer, G., McCowin, M., Gamsu, G., & Moore, E. H. (1985). Bronchogenic carcinoma: Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery. Radiology, 156(1), 117-124.

Bronchogenic carcinoma : Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery. / Webb, W. R.; Jensen, B. G.; Sollitto, R.; de Geer, G.; McCowin, M.; Gamsu, G.; Moore, Elizabeth H.

In: Radiology, Vol. 156, No. 1, 1985, p. 117-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Webb, WR, Jensen, BG, Sollitto, R, de Geer, G, McCowin, M, Gamsu, G & Moore, EH 1985, 'Bronchogenic carcinoma: Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery', Radiology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 117-124.
Webb WR, Jensen BG, Sollitto R, de Geer G, McCowin M, Gamsu G et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery. Radiology. 1985;156(1):117-124.
Webb, W. R. ; Jensen, B. G. ; Sollitto, R. ; de Geer, G. ; McCowin, M. ; Gamsu, G. ; Moore, Elizabeth H. / Bronchogenic carcinoma : Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery. In: Radiology. 1985 ; Vol. 156, No. 1. pp. 117-124.
@article{73f37c73588d4c1f9837efe4526833b8,
title = "Bronchogenic carcinoma: Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery",
abstract = "Thirty-three patients suspected of having bronchogenic carcinoma were studied prospectively using magnetic resonance (MR). In this group, 30 underwent examination with computed tomography (CT), 15 underwent thoracotomy, six had mediastinal biopsy procedures performed, and eight underwent bronchoscopy. MR studies, which included transaxial spin-echo imaging (TR, 0.5 and 2.0 sec; TE, 28 and 56 msec) of all patients and sagittal or coronal imaging of 18, were performed without knowledge of CT findings, using only plain radiographs as a guide. CT and MR studies were interpreted separately. CT and MR provided comparable information regarding the presence and size of mediastinal lymph nodes. MR better discriminated mediastinal nodes from vascular structures. However, in two of 11 patients who had multipe mediastinal lymph nodes that were normal in size at CT examination and surgery, MR suggested a confluent abnormal mass, probably because of its poorer spatial resolution. MR was superior to CT in showing enlarged hilar lymph nodes, but CT was better for demonstrating bronchial abnormalities. In three of four patients who had a proved hilar mass with distal obstructive pneumonia, MR (TR, 2.0 sec) helped distinguish between the mass and collapsed lung.",
author = "Webb, {W. R.} and Jensen, {B. G.} and R. Sollitto and {de Geer}, G. and M. McCowin and G. Gamsu and Moore, {Elizabeth H}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "156",
pages = "117--124",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bronchogenic carcinoma

T2 - Staging with MR compared with staging with CT and surgery

AU - Webb, W. R.

AU - Jensen, B. G.

AU - Sollitto, R.

AU - de Geer, G.

AU - McCowin, M.

AU - Gamsu, G.

AU - Moore, Elizabeth H

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Thirty-three patients suspected of having bronchogenic carcinoma were studied prospectively using magnetic resonance (MR). In this group, 30 underwent examination with computed tomography (CT), 15 underwent thoracotomy, six had mediastinal biopsy procedures performed, and eight underwent bronchoscopy. MR studies, which included transaxial spin-echo imaging (TR, 0.5 and 2.0 sec; TE, 28 and 56 msec) of all patients and sagittal or coronal imaging of 18, were performed without knowledge of CT findings, using only plain radiographs as a guide. CT and MR studies were interpreted separately. CT and MR provided comparable information regarding the presence and size of mediastinal lymph nodes. MR better discriminated mediastinal nodes from vascular structures. However, in two of 11 patients who had multipe mediastinal lymph nodes that were normal in size at CT examination and surgery, MR suggested a confluent abnormal mass, probably because of its poorer spatial resolution. MR was superior to CT in showing enlarged hilar lymph nodes, but CT was better for demonstrating bronchial abnormalities. In three of four patients who had a proved hilar mass with distal obstructive pneumonia, MR (TR, 2.0 sec) helped distinguish between the mass and collapsed lung.

AB - Thirty-three patients suspected of having bronchogenic carcinoma were studied prospectively using magnetic resonance (MR). In this group, 30 underwent examination with computed tomography (CT), 15 underwent thoracotomy, six had mediastinal biopsy procedures performed, and eight underwent bronchoscopy. MR studies, which included transaxial spin-echo imaging (TR, 0.5 and 2.0 sec; TE, 28 and 56 msec) of all patients and sagittal or coronal imaging of 18, were performed without knowledge of CT findings, using only plain radiographs as a guide. CT and MR studies were interpreted separately. CT and MR provided comparable information regarding the presence and size of mediastinal lymph nodes. MR better discriminated mediastinal nodes from vascular structures. However, in two of 11 patients who had multipe mediastinal lymph nodes that were normal in size at CT examination and surgery, MR suggested a confluent abnormal mass, probably because of its poorer spatial resolution. MR was superior to CT in showing enlarged hilar lymph nodes, but CT was better for demonstrating bronchial abnormalities. In three of four patients who had a proved hilar mass with distal obstructive pneumonia, MR (TR, 2.0 sec) helped distinguish between the mass and collapsed lung.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021930477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021930477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 156

SP - 117

EP - 124

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -