Bringing geriatricians to the front lines: Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention in primary care

Joshua J Fenton, Martin D. Levine, Lisa D. Mahoney, Patrick J. Heagerty, Edward H. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Frail elders often receive low-quality primary care, yet the optimal role of geriatricians in primary care settings remains uncertain. We evaluated the health utilization impacts of an innovative intervention emphasizing chronic disease self-management and physical activity promotion among frail elders in primary care. Methods: The intervention was implemented within two primary care practices at a single clinic serving a large population of frail elders enrolled in a western Washington health plan. Subjects included older patients (age ≥65 years) with disproportionate baseline outpatient service use who attended two on-site visits with a geriatrician during which each received comprehensive assessment and a problem-solving intervention to enhance chronic disease self-management and promote physical activity (N = 146). Our evaluation had a retrospective matched cohort design. Controls receiving primary care at other health plan clinics were matched 3:1 to intervention subjects by sex and a propensity score (N = 437), which was computed using demographic, clinical, and health care utilization factors that were predictive of attending the intervention. Among intervention subjects and controls following the intervention, we compared relative rates of hospitalization, outpatient and specialty visits, nursing home admission, mortality, and prescription of selected high-risk medications, as well as total health care costs. Results: From March 2002 to November 2003, the geriatrician evaluated 146 of 725 elderly subjects (20%) in the two primary care practices. During a mean follow-up of 1.3 years, intervention subjects had a reduced rate of hospitalization relative to matched controls (incidence rate ratio 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.86; P < .01). Intervention and control subjects did not have significantly different rates of specialty visits, outpatient visits, nursing home admission, mortality, or high-risk prescriptions. Relative to matched controls during follow-up, total health care costs were 26.3% lower among intervention subjects (95% CI: 1.3%, 44.9%; P = .04). Conclusions: Outpatient geriatric interventions emphasizing collaboration between geriatricians and primary care physicians, chronic disease self-management, and physical activity may reduce hospitalization risk and total health care costs among vulnerable elders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-339
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Primary Health Care
Frail Elderly
Self Care
Disease Management
Health Care Costs
Hospitalization
Chronic Disease
Outpatients
Exercise
Nursing Homes
Prescriptions
Health
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Propensity Score
Mortality
Quality of Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Ambulatory Care
Geriatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Bringing geriatricians to the front lines : Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention in primary care. / Fenton, Joshua J; Levine, Martin D.; Mahoney, Lisa D.; Heagerty, Patrick J.; Wagner, Edward H.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2006, p. 331-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fenton, Joshua J ; Levine, Martin D. ; Mahoney, Lisa D. ; Heagerty, Patrick J. ; Wagner, Edward H. / Bringing geriatricians to the front lines : Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention in primary care. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 331-339.
@article{402653cad8a04cc186154bb15cfab33b,
title = "Bringing geriatricians to the front lines: Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention in primary care",
abstract = "Background: Frail elders often receive low-quality primary care, yet the optimal role of geriatricians in primary care settings remains uncertain. We evaluated the health utilization impacts of an innovative intervention emphasizing chronic disease self-management and physical activity promotion among frail elders in primary care. Methods: The intervention was implemented within two primary care practices at a single clinic serving a large population of frail elders enrolled in a western Washington health plan. Subjects included older patients (age ≥65 years) with disproportionate baseline outpatient service use who attended two on-site visits with a geriatrician during which each received comprehensive assessment and a problem-solving intervention to enhance chronic disease self-management and promote physical activity (N = 146). Our evaluation had a retrospective matched cohort design. Controls receiving primary care at other health plan clinics were matched 3:1 to intervention subjects by sex and a propensity score (N = 437), which was computed using demographic, clinical, and health care utilization factors that were predictive of attending the intervention. Among intervention subjects and controls following the intervention, we compared relative rates of hospitalization, outpatient and specialty visits, nursing home admission, mortality, and prescription of selected high-risk medications, as well as total health care costs. Results: From March 2002 to November 2003, the geriatrician evaluated 146 of 725 elderly subjects (20{\%}) in the two primary care practices. During a mean follow-up of 1.3 years, intervention subjects had a reduced rate of hospitalization relative to matched controls (incidence rate ratio 0.57; 95{\%} CI: 0.37 to 0.86; P < .01). Intervention and control subjects did not have significantly different rates of specialty visits, outpatient visits, nursing home admission, mortality, or high-risk prescriptions. Relative to matched controls during follow-up, total health care costs were 26.3{\%} lower among intervention subjects (95{\%} CI: 1.3{\%}, 44.9{\%}; P = .04). Conclusions: Outpatient geriatric interventions emphasizing collaboration between geriatricians and primary care physicians, chronic disease self-management, and physical activity may reduce hospitalization risk and total health care costs among vulnerable elders.",
author = "Fenton, {Joshua J} and Levine, {Martin D.} and Mahoney, {Lisa D.} and Heagerty, {Patrick J.} and Wagner, {Edward H.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.19.4.331",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "331--339",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bringing geriatricians to the front lines

T2 - Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention in primary care

AU - Fenton, Joshua J

AU - Levine, Martin D.

AU - Mahoney, Lisa D.

AU - Heagerty, Patrick J.

AU - Wagner, Edward H.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Background: Frail elders often receive low-quality primary care, yet the optimal role of geriatricians in primary care settings remains uncertain. We evaluated the health utilization impacts of an innovative intervention emphasizing chronic disease self-management and physical activity promotion among frail elders in primary care. Methods: The intervention was implemented within two primary care practices at a single clinic serving a large population of frail elders enrolled in a western Washington health plan. Subjects included older patients (age ≥65 years) with disproportionate baseline outpatient service use who attended two on-site visits with a geriatrician during which each received comprehensive assessment and a problem-solving intervention to enhance chronic disease self-management and promote physical activity (N = 146). Our evaluation had a retrospective matched cohort design. Controls receiving primary care at other health plan clinics were matched 3:1 to intervention subjects by sex and a propensity score (N = 437), which was computed using demographic, clinical, and health care utilization factors that were predictive of attending the intervention. Among intervention subjects and controls following the intervention, we compared relative rates of hospitalization, outpatient and specialty visits, nursing home admission, mortality, and prescription of selected high-risk medications, as well as total health care costs. Results: From March 2002 to November 2003, the geriatrician evaluated 146 of 725 elderly subjects (20%) in the two primary care practices. During a mean follow-up of 1.3 years, intervention subjects had a reduced rate of hospitalization relative to matched controls (incidence rate ratio 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.86; P < .01). Intervention and control subjects did not have significantly different rates of specialty visits, outpatient visits, nursing home admission, mortality, or high-risk prescriptions. Relative to matched controls during follow-up, total health care costs were 26.3% lower among intervention subjects (95% CI: 1.3%, 44.9%; P = .04). Conclusions: Outpatient geriatric interventions emphasizing collaboration between geriatricians and primary care physicians, chronic disease self-management, and physical activity may reduce hospitalization risk and total health care costs among vulnerable elders.

AB - Background: Frail elders often receive low-quality primary care, yet the optimal role of geriatricians in primary care settings remains uncertain. We evaluated the health utilization impacts of an innovative intervention emphasizing chronic disease self-management and physical activity promotion among frail elders in primary care. Methods: The intervention was implemented within two primary care practices at a single clinic serving a large population of frail elders enrolled in a western Washington health plan. Subjects included older patients (age ≥65 years) with disproportionate baseline outpatient service use who attended two on-site visits with a geriatrician during which each received comprehensive assessment and a problem-solving intervention to enhance chronic disease self-management and promote physical activity (N = 146). Our evaluation had a retrospective matched cohort design. Controls receiving primary care at other health plan clinics were matched 3:1 to intervention subjects by sex and a propensity score (N = 437), which was computed using demographic, clinical, and health care utilization factors that were predictive of attending the intervention. Among intervention subjects and controls following the intervention, we compared relative rates of hospitalization, outpatient and specialty visits, nursing home admission, mortality, and prescription of selected high-risk medications, as well as total health care costs. Results: From March 2002 to November 2003, the geriatrician evaluated 146 of 725 elderly subjects (20%) in the two primary care practices. During a mean follow-up of 1.3 years, intervention subjects had a reduced rate of hospitalization relative to matched controls (incidence rate ratio 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.86; P < .01). Intervention and control subjects did not have significantly different rates of specialty visits, outpatient visits, nursing home admission, mortality, or high-risk prescriptions. Relative to matched controls during follow-up, total health care costs were 26.3% lower among intervention subjects (95% CI: 1.3%, 44.9%; P = .04). Conclusions: Outpatient geriatric interventions emphasizing collaboration between geriatricians and primary care physicians, chronic disease self-management, and physical activity may reduce hospitalization risk and total health care costs among vulnerable elders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745927742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745927742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.19.4.331

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.19.4.331

M3 - Article

C2 - 16809646

AN - SCOPUS:33745927742

VL - 19

SP - 331

EP - 339

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 4

ER -