TY - JOUR
T1 - Breast Density Knowledge in a Screening Mammography Population Exposed to Density Notification
AU - Smith, Rebecca E.
AU - Sprague, Brian
AU - Henderson, Louise M.
AU - Kerlikowske, Karla
AU - Miglioretti, Diana L.
AU - Buist, Diana S.M.
AU - Wernli, Karen J.
AU - Onega, Tracy
AU - Schifferdecker, Karen
AU - Jackson-Nefertiti, Gloria
AU - Johnson, Dianne
AU - Budesky, Jill
AU - Tosteson, Anna N.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this work was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Program Award (PCS-1504-30370). Data collection for this research was additionally supported by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium with funding from the National Cancer Institute (P01CA154292, U54CA163303). The collection of UC Davis data was supported in part by the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Placer County Breast Cancer Foundation, and the UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science Center. The collection of cancer data used in this study was supported in part by several US state public health departments and cancer registries (https://www.bcsc-research.org/about/work-acknowledgement). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee, nor those of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. We thank the participating women, mammography facilities, and radiologists for the data they have provided for this study. You can learn more about the BCSC at: http://www.bcsc-research.org/.
Funding Information:
Research reported in this work was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Program Award (PCS-1504-30370). Data collection for this research was additionally supported by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium with funding from the National Cancer Institute (P01CA154292, U54CA163303). The collection of UC Davis data was supported in part by the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Placer County Breast Cancer Foundation, and the UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science Center. The collection of cancer data used in this study was supported in part by several US state public health departments and cancer registries ( https://www.bcsc-research.org/about/work-acknowledgement ). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee, nor those of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. We thank the participating women, mammography facilities, and radiologists for the data they have provided for this study. You can learn more about the BCSC at: http://www.bcsc-research.org/ .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Radiology
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: Women are increasingly informed about their breast density due to state density reporting laws. However, accuracy of personal breast density knowledge remains unclear. We compared self-reported with clinically assessed breast density and assessed knowledge of density implications and feelings about future screening. Methods: From December 2017 to January 2020, we surveyed women aged 40 to 74 years without prior breast cancer, with a normal screening mammogram in the prior year, and ≥1 recorded breast density measures in four Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium registries with density reporting laws. We measured agreement between self-reported and BI-RADS breast density categorized as “ever-dense” if heterogeneously or extremely dense within the past 5 years or “never-dense” otherwise, knowledge of dense breast implications, and feelings about future screening. Results: Survey participation was 28% (1,528 of 5,408), and 59% (896 of 1,528) of participants had ever-dense breasts. Concordance between self-report versus clinical density was 76% (677 of 896) among women with ever-dense breasts and 14% (89 of 632) among women with never-dense breasts, and 34% (217 of 632) with never-dense breasts reported being told they had dense breasts. Desire for supplemental screening was more frequent among those who reported having dense breasts 29% (256 of 893) or asked to imagine having dense breasts 30% (152 of 513) versus those reporting nondense breasts 15% (15 of 102) (P = .003, P = .002, respectively). Women with never-dense breasts had 6.3-fold higher odds (95% confidence interval:3.39-11.80) of accurate knowledge in states reporting density to all compared to states reporting only to women with dense breasts. Discussion: Standardized communications of breast density results to all women may increase density knowledge and are needed to support informed screening decisions.
AB - Objective: Women are increasingly informed about their breast density due to state density reporting laws. However, accuracy of personal breast density knowledge remains unclear. We compared self-reported with clinically assessed breast density and assessed knowledge of density implications and feelings about future screening. Methods: From December 2017 to January 2020, we surveyed women aged 40 to 74 years without prior breast cancer, with a normal screening mammogram in the prior year, and ≥1 recorded breast density measures in four Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium registries with density reporting laws. We measured agreement between self-reported and BI-RADS breast density categorized as “ever-dense” if heterogeneously or extremely dense within the past 5 years or “never-dense” otherwise, knowledge of dense breast implications, and feelings about future screening. Results: Survey participation was 28% (1,528 of 5,408), and 59% (896 of 1,528) of participants had ever-dense breasts. Concordance between self-report versus clinical density was 76% (677 of 896) among women with ever-dense breasts and 14% (89 of 632) among women with never-dense breasts, and 34% (217 of 632) with never-dense breasts reported being told they had dense breasts. Desire for supplemental screening was more frequent among those who reported having dense breasts 29% (256 of 893) or asked to imagine having dense breasts 30% (152 of 513) versus those reporting nondense breasts 15% (15 of 102) (P = .003, P = .002, respectively). Women with never-dense breasts had 6.3-fold higher odds (95% confidence interval:3.39-11.80) of accurate knowledge in states reporting density to all compared to states reporting only to women with dense breasts. Discussion: Standardized communications of breast density results to all women may increase density knowledge and are needed to support informed screening decisions.
KW - Breast density
KW - breast density notification
KW - patient-reported outcomes
KW - screening mammography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128193861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128193861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 35341697
AN - SCOPUS:85128193861
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
SN - 1558-349X
ER -