Abstract
Brain imaging studies suggest that the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC), is involved in relational reasoning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involving Raven's Progressive Matrices or verbal propositional analogies indicate that the RLPFC is engaged by tasks that require integration across multiple relational structures. Several studies have shown that the RLPFC is more active when people must evaluate an analogy (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand?) than when they must simply evaluate two individual semantic relationships, consistent with the hypothesis that this region is important for relational integration. The current fMRI investigation further explores the role of the RLPFC in reasoning and relational integration by comparing RLPFC activation across four different propositional analogy conditions. Each of the four conditions required either relation completion (e.g., Shoe is to foot as glove is to WHAT? → "hand") or relation comparison (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand? → "yes"). The RLPFC was engaged more strongly by the comparison subtask relative to completion, suggesting that the RLPFC is particularly involved in comparing relational structures.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 682-693 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2008 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Cite this
"Brain is to thought as stomach is to??" : Investigating the role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex in relational reasoning. / Wendelken, Carter; Nakhabenko, Denis; Donohue, Sarah E.; Carter, Cameron S; Bunge, Silvia A.
In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 682-693.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - "Brain is to thought as stomach is to??"
T2 - Investigating the role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex in relational reasoning
AU - Wendelken, Carter
AU - Nakhabenko, Denis
AU - Donohue, Sarah E.
AU - Carter, Cameron S
AU - Bunge, Silvia A.
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - Brain imaging studies suggest that the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC), is involved in relational reasoning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involving Raven's Progressive Matrices or verbal propositional analogies indicate that the RLPFC is engaged by tasks that require integration across multiple relational structures. Several studies have shown that the RLPFC is more active when people must evaluate an analogy (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand?) than when they must simply evaluate two individual semantic relationships, consistent with the hypothesis that this region is important for relational integration. The current fMRI investigation further explores the role of the RLPFC in reasoning and relational integration by comparing RLPFC activation across four different propositional analogy conditions. Each of the four conditions required either relation completion (e.g., Shoe is to foot as glove is to WHAT? → "hand") or relation comparison (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand? → "yes"). The RLPFC was engaged more strongly by the comparison subtask relative to completion, suggesting that the RLPFC is particularly involved in comparing relational structures.
AB - Brain imaging studies suggest that the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC), is involved in relational reasoning. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies involving Raven's Progressive Matrices or verbal propositional analogies indicate that the RLPFC is engaged by tasks that require integration across multiple relational structures. Several studies have shown that the RLPFC is more active when people must evaluate an analogy (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand?) than when they must simply evaluate two individual semantic relationships, consistent with the hypothesis that this region is important for relational integration. The current fMRI investigation further explores the role of the RLPFC in reasoning and relational integration by comparing RLPFC activation across four different propositional analogy conditions. Each of the four conditions required either relation completion (e.g., Shoe is to foot as glove is to WHAT? → "hand") or relation comparison (e.g., Is shoe to foot as glove is to hand? → "yes"). The RLPFC was engaged more strongly by the comparison subtask relative to completion, suggesting that the RLPFC is particularly involved in comparing relational structures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41649087838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41649087838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2008.20055
DO - 10.1162/jocn.2008.20055
M3 - Article
VL - 20
SP - 682
EP - 693
JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
SN - 0898-929X
IS - 4
ER -