Botanical and phytochemical therapy of acne

A systematic review

Whitney A. Fisk, Hadar A. Lev-Tov, Raja K Sivamani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Acne is prevalent among adolescents and adults with significant psychological effects. Standard oral and topical therapies can have significant side effects including skin irritation, gastrointestinal upset, and the development of drug-resistant bacteria. The use of botanicals and phytochemicals in dermatological products is increasingly popular, and many patients are turning to these alternative therapies for treatment of acne. This study aimed to systematically review clinical studies that have investigated the use of botanical agents in the treatment of acne. PubMed and Embase databases were searched in March 2013 for trials assessing botanical therapies in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Data from these trials are presented, and methodology of each study is assessed. Twenty-three trials met inclusion criteria. Interventions included plant extracts, herbal formulations, and phytochemicals. All studies reported favorable results, and several showed equal or superior treatment to standard therapies. No serious adverse events were reported. Few studies were methodologically rigorous. Each botanical was studied in only one or two trials. Botanicals are promising therapies for acne vulgaris although further research is warranted, especially with regard to severe acne and acne resistant to conventional therapy. There is a need for standardized methods for grading acne and assessing therapeutic effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1137-1152
Number of pages16
JournalPhytotherapy Research
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Acne Vulgaris
Phytochemicals
Therapeutics
Plant Extracts
Therapeutic Uses
Complementary Therapies
PubMed
Databases
Psychology
Bacteria
Skin

Keywords

  • acne
  • alternative
  • botanical
  • herbs
  • phytochemical
  • plants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Botanical and phytochemical therapy of acne : A systematic review. / Fisk, Whitney A.; Lev-Tov, Hadar A.; Sivamani, Raja K.

In: Phytotherapy Research, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2014, p. 1137-1152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fisk, Whitney A. ; Lev-Tov, Hadar A. ; Sivamani, Raja K. / Botanical and phytochemical therapy of acne : A systematic review. In: Phytotherapy Research. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 8. pp. 1137-1152.
@article{0ec32808364a42d09f5bd5f1320c753b,
title = "Botanical and phytochemical therapy of acne: A systematic review",
abstract = "Acne is prevalent among adolescents and adults with significant psychological effects. Standard oral and topical therapies can have significant side effects including skin irritation, gastrointestinal upset, and the development of drug-resistant bacteria. The use of botanicals and phytochemicals in dermatological products is increasingly popular, and many patients are turning to these alternative therapies for treatment of acne. This study aimed to systematically review clinical studies that have investigated the use of botanical agents in the treatment of acne. PubMed and Embase databases were searched in March 2013 for trials assessing botanical therapies in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Data from these trials are presented, and methodology of each study is assessed. Twenty-three trials met inclusion criteria. Interventions included plant extracts, herbal formulations, and phytochemicals. All studies reported favorable results, and several showed equal or superior treatment to standard therapies. No serious adverse events were reported. Few studies were methodologically rigorous. Each botanical was studied in only one or two trials. Botanicals are promising therapies for acne vulgaris although further research is warranted, especially with regard to severe acne and acne resistant to conventional therapy. There is a need for standardized methods for grading acne and assessing therapeutic effects.",
keywords = "acne, alternative, botanical, herbs, phytochemical, plants",
author = "Fisk, {Whitney A.} and Lev-Tov, {Hadar A.} and Sivamani, {Raja K}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/ptr.5125",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1137--1152",
journal = "Phytotherapy Research",
issn = "0951-418X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Botanical and phytochemical therapy of acne

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Fisk, Whitney A.

AU - Lev-Tov, Hadar A.

AU - Sivamani, Raja K

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Acne is prevalent among adolescents and adults with significant psychological effects. Standard oral and topical therapies can have significant side effects including skin irritation, gastrointestinal upset, and the development of drug-resistant bacteria. The use of botanicals and phytochemicals in dermatological products is increasingly popular, and many patients are turning to these alternative therapies for treatment of acne. This study aimed to systematically review clinical studies that have investigated the use of botanical agents in the treatment of acne. PubMed and Embase databases were searched in March 2013 for trials assessing botanical therapies in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Data from these trials are presented, and methodology of each study is assessed. Twenty-three trials met inclusion criteria. Interventions included plant extracts, herbal formulations, and phytochemicals. All studies reported favorable results, and several showed equal or superior treatment to standard therapies. No serious adverse events were reported. Few studies were methodologically rigorous. Each botanical was studied in only one or two trials. Botanicals are promising therapies for acne vulgaris although further research is warranted, especially with regard to severe acne and acne resistant to conventional therapy. There is a need for standardized methods for grading acne and assessing therapeutic effects.

AB - Acne is prevalent among adolescents and adults with significant psychological effects. Standard oral and topical therapies can have significant side effects including skin irritation, gastrointestinal upset, and the development of drug-resistant bacteria. The use of botanicals and phytochemicals in dermatological products is increasingly popular, and many patients are turning to these alternative therapies for treatment of acne. This study aimed to systematically review clinical studies that have investigated the use of botanical agents in the treatment of acne. PubMed and Embase databases were searched in March 2013 for trials assessing botanical therapies in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Data from these trials are presented, and methodology of each study is assessed. Twenty-three trials met inclusion criteria. Interventions included plant extracts, herbal formulations, and phytochemicals. All studies reported favorable results, and several showed equal or superior treatment to standard therapies. No serious adverse events were reported. Few studies were methodologically rigorous. Each botanical was studied in only one or two trials. Botanicals are promising therapies for acne vulgaris although further research is warranted, especially with regard to severe acne and acne resistant to conventional therapy. There is a need for standardized methods for grading acne and assessing therapeutic effects.

KW - acne

KW - alternative

KW - botanical

KW - herbs

KW - phytochemical

KW - plants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905672671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905672671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ptr.5125

DO - 10.1002/ptr.5125

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1137

EP - 1152

JO - Phytotherapy Research

JF - Phytotherapy Research

SN - 0951-418X

IS - 8

ER -