Biomechanical Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

Rishabh Jethanandani, Mahbubul B. Patwary, Adam D. Shellito, John P. Meehan, Derek F. Amanatullah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty is a potential risk factor for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture. We conducted a study to determine if the design of the femoral implant changes the risk for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures after anterior cortical notching. An anterior cortical defect was created in 12 femoral polyurethane models. Six femora were instrumented with cruciate-retaining implants and 6 with posterior-stabilized implants. Each femur was loaded in external rotation along the anatomical axis. Notch depth and distance from anterior cortical notch to implant were recorded before loading, and fracture pattern was recorded after failure. There were no statistically significant differences in notch depth, distance from notch to implant, torsional stiffness, torque at failure, final torque, or fracture pattern between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized femoral component designs. Periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching is independent of the bone removed from the intercondylar notch. After notching, there likely is no significant difference in femoral strength in torsion between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E268-E272
JournalAmerican journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
Volume45
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Thigh
Femur
Torque
Periprosthetic Fractures
Polyurethanes
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Biomechanical Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. / Jethanandani, Rishabh; Patwary, Mahbubul B.; Shellito, Adam D.; Meehan, John P.; Amanatullah, Derek F.

In: American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.), Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.07.2016, p. E268-E272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jethanandani, Rishabh ; Patwary, Mahbubul B. ; Shellito, Adam D. ; Meehan, John P. ; Amanatullah, Derek F. / Biomechanical Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.). 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. E268-E272.
@article{c73eb8633d9e46ad82bd8f04b18b83bd,
title = "Biomechanical Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty",
abstract = "Anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty is a potential risk factor for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture. We conducted a study to determine if the design of the femoral implant changes the risk for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures after anterior cortical notching. An anterior cortical defect was created in 12 femoral polyurethane models. Six femora were instrumented with cruciate-retaining implants and 6 with posterior-stabilized implants. Each femur was loaded in external rotation along the anatomical axis. Notch depth and distance from anterior cortical notch to implant were recorded before loading, and fracture pattern was recorded after failure. There were no statistically significant differences in notch depth, distance from notch to implant, torsional stiffness, torque at failure, final torque, or fracture pattern between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized femoral component designs. Periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching is independent of the bone removed from the intercondylar notch. After notching, there likely is no significant difference in femoral strength in torsion between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs.",
author = "Rishabh Jethanandani and Patwary, {Mahbubul B.} and Shellito, {Adam D.} and Meehan, {John P.} and Amanatullah, {Derek F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "E268--E272",
journal = "American Journal of Orthopedics",
issn = "1078-4519",
publisher = "Quadrant Healthcom Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical Consequences of Anterior Femoral Notching in Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

AU - Jethanandani, Rishabh

AU - Patwary, Mahbubul B.

AU - Shellito, Adam D.

AU - Meehan, John P.

AU - Amanatullah, Derek F.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty is a potential risk factor for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture. We conducted a study to determine if the design of the femoral implant changes the risk for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures after anterior cortical notching. An anterior cortical defect was created in 12 femoral polyurethane models. Six femora were instrumented with cruciate-retaining implants and 6 with posterior-stabilized implants. Each femur was loaded in external rotation along the anatomical axis. Notch depth and distance from anterior cortical notch to implant were recorded before loading, and fracture pattern was recorded after failure. There were no statistically significant differences in notch depth, distance from notch to implant, torsional stiffness, torque at failure, final torque, or fracture pattern between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized femoral component designs. Periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching is independent of the bone removed from the intercondylar notch. After notching, there likely is no significant difference in femoral strength in torsion between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs.

AB - Anterior femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty is a potential risk factor for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fracture. We conducted a study to determine if the design of the femoral implant changes the risk for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures after anterior cortical notching. An anterior cortical defect was created in 12 femoral polyurethane models. Six femora were instrumented with cruciate-retaining implants and 6 with posterior-stabilized implants. Each femur was loaded in external rotation along the anatomical axis. Notch depth and distance from anterior cortical notch to implant were recorded before loading, and fracture pattern was recorded after failure. There were no statistically significant differences in notch depth, distance from notch to implant, torsional stiffness, torque at failure, final torque, or fracture pattern between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized femoral component designs. Periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching is independent of the bone removed from the intercondylar notch. After notching, there likely is no significant difference in femoral strength in torsion between cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized designs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044535154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044535154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 27552464

AN - SCOPUS:85044535154

VL - 45

SP - E268-E272

JO - American Journal of Orthopedics

JF - American Journal of Orthopedics

SN - 1078-4519

IS - 5

ER -