Biomechanical comparison of five external wrist fixators

David Chang, Frederick J. Kummer, Ken Egol, Nirmal Tejwani, Philip R Wolinsky, Kenneth J. Koval

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The relative stiffness of five different external wrist fixators currently in use for distal radius fractures was determined using a uniform fracture model consisting of wood dowels to isolate the effects of the fixators themselves. Each construct was loaded in axial compression, eccentric and cantilever modes of bending, and torsion. The stiffest of the fixators varied by a factor of three in compression, five in bending, and three in torsion. Although the ideal stiffness of a wrist fixator is unknown, there is a large variation in the stiffness of existing devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-44
Number of pages5
JournalBulletin: Hospital for Joint Diseases
Volume61
Issue number1-2
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Surgery
  • Bioengineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical comparison of five external wrist fixators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Chang, D., Kummer, F. J., Egol, K., Tejwani, N., Wolinsky, P. R., & Koval, K. J. (2002). Biomechanical comparison of five external wrist fixators. Bulletin: Hospital for Joint Diseases, 61(1-2), 40-44.