Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?

Shelby Brown, Michael Mirmanesh, Ping Song, Demetrius Coombs, David Rengifo, Lee Li-Qun Pu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Although many aesthetic surgeons believe that beveling the angle of an incision improves the aesthetic outcome with regard to scaring, the literature remains scarce largely because few studies have been conducted. Objective: This systematic review therefore aims to identify whether using a beveled incision adds an aesthetic benefit, to determine whether there is a specific angle that yields a superior outcome, and for the first time, to present a complete discussion of this subject for practicing surgeons. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to search for primary articles. The main inclusion criteria were primary journal articles investigating the use of a beveled angle via a controlled study. Results: A total of fifty-four publications were reviewed, with only four publications including 124 patients suitable for use in this systematic review. All the studies concluded that the use of a beveled angle incision improved aesthetic outcomes, with the ideal angle ranging from 10° to 45°. Conclusions: The use of a beveled angle incision can improve scar aesthetics and encourages the regrowth of hair follicles and shafts through the scars via multiple mechanisms. Nevertheless, the paucity of literature available to the practitioner compels further research assessing this important topic. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalAesthetic Plastic Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 23 2018

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Cicatrix
Publications
Hair Follicle
Evidence-Based Medicine
PubMed
Databases
Research
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Beveled
  • Beveled incision
  • Facelift
  • Incision
  • Scarring
  • Scars

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Brown, S., Mirmanesh, M., Song, P., Coombs, D., Rengifo, D., & Pu, L. L-Q. (Accepted/In press). Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence? Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2

Beveled Incisions : What is the Evidence? / Brown, Shelby; Mirmanesh, Michael; Song, Ping; Coombs, Demetrius; Rengifo, David; Pu, Lee Li-Qun.

In: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 23.02.2018, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Shelby ; Mirmanesh, Michael ; Song, Ping ; Coombs, Demetrius ; Rengifo, David ; Pu, Lee Li-Qun. / Beveled Incisions : What is the Evidence?. In: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2018 ; pp. 1-5.
@article{aecfb32e606348468d60f82225bdc3cb,
title = "Beveled Incisions: What is the Evidence?",
abstract = "Background: Although many aesthetic surgeons believe that beveling the angle of an incision improves the aesthetic outcome with regard to scaring, the literature remains scarce largely because few studies have been conducted. Objective: This systematic review therefore aims to identify whether using a beveled incision adds an aesthetic benefit, to determine whether there is a specific angle that yields a superior outcome, and for the first time, to present a complete discussion of this subject for practicing surgeons. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to search for primary articles. The main inclusion criteria were primary journal articles investigating the use of a beveled angle via a controlled study. Results: A total of fifty-four publications were reviewed, with only four publications including 124 patients suitable for use in this systematic review. All the studies concluded that the use of a beveled angle incision improved aesthetic outcomes, with the ideal angle ranging from 10° to 45°. Conclusions: The use of a beveled angle incision can improve scar aesthetics and encourages the regrowth of hair follicles and shafts through the scars via multiple mechanisms. Nevertheless, the paucity of literature available to the practitioner compels further research assessing this important topic. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.",
keywords = "Beveled, Beveled incision, Facelift, Incision, Scarring, Scars",
author = "Shelby Brown and Michael Mirmanesh and Ping Song and Demetrius Coombs and David Rengifo and Pu, {Lee Li-Qun}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Aesthetic Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0364-216X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beveled Incisions

T2 - What is the Evidence?

AU - Brown, Shelby

AU - Mirmanesh, Michael

AU - Song, Ping

AU - Coombs, Demetrius

AU - Rengifo, David

AU - Pu, Lee Li-Qun

PY - 2018/2/23

Y1 - 2018/2/23

N2 - Background: Although many aesthetic surgeons believe that beveling the angle of an incision improves the aesthetic outcome with regard to scaring, the literature remains scarce largely because few studies have been conducted. Objective: This systematic review therefore aims to identify whether using a beveled incision adds an aesthetic benefit, to determine whether there is a specific angle that yields a superior outcome, and for the first time, to present a complete discussion of this subject for practicing surgeons. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to search for primary articles. The main inclusion criteria were primary journal articles investigating the use of a beveled angle via a controlled study. Results: A total of fifty-four publications were reviewed, with only four publications including 124 patients suitable for use in this systematic review. All the studies concluded that the use of a beveled angle incision improved aesthetic outcomes, with the ideal angle ranging from 10° to 45°. Conclusions: The use of a beveled angle incision can improve scar aesthetics and encourages the regrowth of hair follicles and shafts through the scars via multiple mechanisms. Nevertheless, the paucity of literature available to the practitioner compels further research assessing this important topic. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

AB - Background: Although many aesthetic surgeons believe that beveling the angle of an incision improves the aesthetic outcome with regard to scaring, the literature remains scarce largely because few studies have been conducted. Objective: This systematic review therefore aims to identify whether using a beveled incision adds an aesthetic benefit, to determine whether there is a specific angle that yields a superior outcome, and for the first time, to present a complete discussion of this subject for practicing surgeons. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to search for primary articles. The main inclusion criteria were primary journal articles investigating the use of a beveled angle via a controlled study. Results: A total of fifty-four publications were reviewed, with only four publications including 124 patients suitable for use in this systematic review. All the studies concluded that the use of a beveled angle incision improved aesthetic outcomes, with the ideal angle ranging from 10° to 45°. Conclusions: The use of a beveled angle incision can improve scar aesthetics and encourages the regrowth of hair follicles and shafts through the scars via multiple mechanisms. Nevertheless, the paucity of literature available to the practitioner compels further research assessing this important topic. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

KW - Beveled

KW - Beveled incision

KW - Facelift

KW - Incision

KW - Scarring

KW - Scars

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044947838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044947838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2

DO - 10.1007/s00266-018-1105-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 29476262

AN - SCOPUS:85044947838

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

JF - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

SN - 0364-216X

ER -