Abstract
A benefit-cost analysis was performed at the request of the California Department of Health Services on its plague control program at 2 California campgrounds. In addition to the current control program, consisting of surveillance and control, a surveillance-only program and 2 no-program alternatives were considered. The results showed that the current control program was economically preferable, with an average annual net benefit of ca. $2000. Ranking the suboptimal alternatives showed that the no-program/open-park alternative was the next preferable, followed by the surveillance-only program, then the no-program/park-closure alternative. Sensitivity analysis showed that the current control program would remain optimal if the initial assumptions were reasonably accurate. However, the results were highly sensitive to the assumed number of human cases and frequency of epidemics. Slight overstatement of these factors might incorrectly favor the current control program over the no-program/open-park alternative. Methodology developed in this study may be applied to an evaluation of the California (or other statewide/regional) plague control programs.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 499-506 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Entomology |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1985 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Parasitology
- veterinary(all)
- Insect Science
- Infectious Diseases
Cite this
Benefit-cost analysis of bubonic plague surveillance and control at two campgrounds in California, USA. / Kimsey, S. W.; Carpenter, Tim; Pappaioanou, M.; Lusk, E.
In: Journal of Medical Entomology, Vol. 22, No. 5, 01.01.1985, p. 499-506.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Benefit-cost analysis of bubonic plague surveillance and control at two campgrounds in California, USA
AU - Kimsey, S. W.
AU - Carpenter, Tim
AU - Pappaioanou, M.
AU - Lusk, E.
PY - 1985/1/1
Y1 - 1985/1/1
N2 - A benefit-cost analysis was performed at the request of the California Department of Health Services on its plague control program at 2 California campgrounds. In addition to the current control program, consisting of surveillance and control, a surveillance-only program and 2 no-program alternatives were considered. The results showed that the current control program was economically preferable, with an average annual net benefit of ca. $2000. Ranking the suboptimal alternatives showed that the no-program/open-park alternative was the next preferable, followed by the surveillance-only program, then the no-program/park-closure alternative. Sensitivity analysis showed that the current control program would remain optimal if the initial assumptions were reasonably accurate. However, the results were highly sensitive to the assumed number of human cases and frequency of epidemics. Slight overstatement of these factors might incorrectly favor the current control program over the no-program/open-park alternative. Methodology developed in this study may be applied to an evaluation of the California (or other statewide/regional) plague control programs.
AB - A benefit-cost analysis was performed at the request of the California Department of Health Services on its plague control program at 2 California campgrounds. In addition to the current control program, consisting of surveillance and control, a surveillance-only program and 2 no-program alternatives were considered. The results showed that the current control program was economically preferable, with an average annual net benefit of ca. $2000. Ranking the suboptimal alternatives showed that the no-program/open-park alternative was the next preferable, followed by the surveillance-only program, then the no-program/park-closure alternative. Sensitivity analysis showed that the current control program would remain optimal if the initial assumptions were reasonably accurate. However, the results were highly sensitive to the assumed number of human cases and frequency of epidemics. Slight overstatement of these factors might incorrectly favor the current control program over the no-program/open-park alternative. Methodology developed in this study may be applied to an evaluation of the California (or other statewide/regional) plague control programs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022252936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022252936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jmedent/22.5.499
DO - 10.1093/jmedent/22.5.499
M3 - Article
C2 - 3930741
AN - SCOPUS:0022252936
VL - 22
SP - 499
EP - 506
JO - Journal of Medical Entomology
JF - Journal of Medical Entomology
SN - 0022-2585
IS - 5
ER -