Beam optimization for digital mammography - II

Mark B. Williams, Priya Raghunathan, J Anthony Seibert, Alex Kwan, Joseph Lo, Ehsan Samei, Laurie Fajardo, Andrew D A Maidment, Martin Yaffe, Aili Bloomquist

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optimization of acquisition technique factors (target, filter, and kVp) in digital mammography is required for maximization of the image SNR, while minimizing patient dose. The goal of this study is to compare, for each of the major commercially available FFDM systems, the effect of various technique factors on image SNR and radiation dose for a range of breast thickness and tissue types. This phantom study follows the approach of an earlier investigation[1], and includes measurements on recent versions of two of the FFDM systems discussed in that paper, as well as on three FFDM systems not available at that time, The five commercial FFDM systems tested are located at five different university test sites and include all FFDM systems that are currently FDA approved. Performance was assessed using 9 different phantom types (three compressed thicknesses, and three tissue composition types) using all available x-ray target and filter combinations, The figure of merit (FOM) used to compare technique factors is the ratio of the square of the image SNR to the mean glandular dose (MGD). This FOM has been used previously by others in mammographic beam optimization studies [2],[3]. For selected examples, data are presented describing the change in SNR, MOD, and FOM with changing kVp, as well as with changing target and/or filter type. For all nine breast types the target/filter/kVp combination resulting in the highest FOM value is presented. Our results suggest that in general, technique combinations resulting in higher energy beams resulted in higher FOM values, for nearly all breast types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Pages273-280
Number of pages8
Volume4046 LNCS
StatePublished - 2006
Event8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM 2006 - Manchester, United Kingdom
Duration: Jun 18 2006Jun 21 2006

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume4046 LNCS
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Other

Other8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM 2006
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityManchester
Period6/18/066/21/06

Fingerprint

Digital Mammography
Mammography
Figure
Breast
Optimization
Filter
Dose
Target
Tissue
Phantom
Dosimetry
X-Rays
Radiation
X rays
High Energy
Chemical analysis
Range of data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Theoretical Computer Science

Cite this

Williams, M. B., Raghunathan, P., Seibert, J. A., Kwan, A., Lo, J., Samei, E., ... Bloomquist, A. (2006). Beam optimization for digital mammography - II. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4046 LNCS, pp. 273-280). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 4046 LNCS).

Beam optimization for digital mammography - II. / Williams, Mark B.; Raghunathan, Priya; Seibert, J Anthony; Kwan, Alex; Lo, Joseph; Samei, Ehsan; Fajardo, Laurie; Maidment, Andrew D A; Yaffe, Martin; Bloomquist, Aili.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 4046 LNCS 2006. p. 273-280 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 4046 LNCS).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Williams, MB, Raghunathan, P, Seibert, JA, Kwan, A, Lo, J, Samei, E, Fajardo, L, Maidment, ADA, Yaffe, M & Bloomquist, A 2006, Beam optimization for digital mammography - II. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). vol. 4046 LNCS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 4046 LNCS, pp. 273-280, 8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, IWDM 2006, Manchester, United Kingdom, 6/18/06.
Williams MB, Raghunathan P, Seibert JA, Kwan A, Lo J, Samei E et al. Beam optimization for digital mammography - II. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 4046 LNCS. 2006. p. 273-280. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
Williams, Mark B. ; Raghunathan, Priya ; Seibert, J Anthony ; Kwan, Alex ; Lo, Joseph ; Samei, Ehsan ; Fajardo, Laurie ; Maidment, Andrew D A ; Yaffe, Martin ; Bloomquist, Aili. / Beam optimization for digital mammography - II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 4046 LNCS 2006. pp. 273-280 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{9d68233707754e2483f35eeb5dffa4f0,
title = "Beam optimization for digital mammography - II",
abstract = "Optimization of acquisition technique factors (target, filter, and kVp) in digital mammography is required for maximization of the image SNR, while minimizing patient dose. The goal of this study is to compare, for each of the major commercially available FFDM systems, the effect of various technique factors on image SNR and radiation dose for a range of breast thickness and tissue types. This phantom study follows the approach of an earlier investigation[1], and includes measurements on recent versions of two of the FFDM systems discussed in that paper, as well as on three FFDM systems not available at that time, The five commercial FFDM systems tested are located at five different university test sites and include all FFDM systems that are currently FDA approved. Performance was assessed using 9 different phantom types (three compressed thicknesses, and three tissue composition types) using all available x-ray target and filter combinations, The figure of merit (FOM) used to compare technique factors is the ratio of the square of the image SNR to the mean glandular dose (MGD). This FOM has been used previously by others in mammographic beam optimization studies [2],[3]. For selected examples, data are presented describing the change in SNR, MOD, and FOM with changing kVp, as well as with changing target and/or filter type. For all nine breast types the target/filter/kVp combination resulting in the highest FOM value is presented. Our results suggest that in general, technique combinations resulting in higher energy beams resulted in higher FOM values, for nearly all breast types.",
author = "Williams, {Mark B.} and Priya Raghunathan and Seibert, {J Anthony} and Alex Kwan and Joseph Lo and Ehsan Samei and Laurie Fajardo and Maidment, {Andrew D A} and Martin Yaffe and Aili Bloomquist",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "3540356258",
volume = "4046 LNCS",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
pages = "273--280",
booktitle = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Beam optimization for digital mammography - II

AU - Williams, Mark B.

AU - Raghunathan, Priya

AU - Seibert, J Anthony

AU - Kwan, Alex

AU - Lo, Joseph

AU - Samei, Ehsan

AU - Fajardo, Laurie

AU - Maidment, Andrew D A

AU - Yaffe, Martin

AU - Bloomquist, Aili

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Optimization of acquisition technique factors (target, filter, and kVp) in digital mammography is required for maximization of the image SNR, while minimizing patient dose. The goal of this study is to compare, for each of the major commercially available FFDM systems, the effect of various technique factors on image SNR and radiation dose for a range of breast thickness and tissue types. This phantom study follows the approach of an earlier investigation[1], and includes measurements on recent versions of two of the FFDM systems discussed in that paper, as well as on three FFDM systems not available at that time, The five commercial FFDM systems tested are located at five different university test sites and include all FFDM systems that are currently FDA approved. Performance was assessed using 9 different phantom types (three compressed thicknesses, and three tissue composition types) using all available x-ray target and filter combinations, The figure of merit (FOM) used to compare technique factors is the ratio of the square of the image SNR to the mean glandular dose (MGD). This FOM has been used previously by others in mammographic beam optimization studies [2],[3]. For selected examples, data are presented describing the change in SNR, MOD, and FOM with changing kVp, as well as with changing target and/or filter type. For all nine breast types the target/filter/kVp combination resulting in the highest FOM value is presented. Our results suggest that in general, technique combinations resulting in higher energy beams resulted in higher FOM values, for nearly all breast types.

AB - Optimization of acquisition technique factors (target, filter, and kVp) in digital mammography is required for maximization of the image SNR, while minimizing patient dose. The goal of this study is to compare, for each of the major commercially available FFDM systems, the effect of various technique factors on image SNR and radiation dose for a range of breast thickness and tissue types. This phantom study follows the approach of an earlier investigation[1], and includes measurements on recent versions of two of the FFDM systems discussed in that paper, as well as on three FFDM systems not available at that time, The five commercial FFDM systems tested are located at five different university test sites and include all FFDM systems that are currently FDA approved. Performance was assessed using 9 different phantom types (three compressed thicknesses, and three tissue composition types) using all available x-ray target and filter combinations, The figure of merit (FOM) used to compare technique factors is the ratio of the square of the image SNR to the mean glandular dose (MGD). This FOM has been used previously by others in mammographic beam optimization studies [2],[3]. For selected examples, data are presented describing the change in SNR, MOD, and FOM with changing kVp, as well as with changing target and/or filter type. For all nine breast types the target/filter/kVp combination resulting in the highest FOM value is presented. Our results suggest that in general, technique combinations resulting in higher energy beams resulted in higher FOM values, for nearly all breast types.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746357612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746357612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:33746357612

SN - 3540356258

SN - 9783540356257

VL - 4046 LNCS

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 273

EP - 280

BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

ER -