Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods

Hwanhee Hong, Kara Rudolph, Elizabeth A. Stuart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Propensity score methods are an important tool to help reduce confounding in non-experimental studies and produce more accurate causal effect estimates. Most propensity score methods assume that covariates are measured without error. However, covariates are often measured with error. Recent work has shown that ignoring such error could lead to bias in treatment effect estimates. In this paper, we consider an additional complication: that of differential measurement error across treatment groups, such as can occur if a covariate is measured differently in the treatment and control groups. We propose two flexible Bayesian approaches for handling differential measurement error when estimating average causal effects using propensity score methods. We consider three scenarios: systematic (i.e., a location shift), heteroscedastic (i.e., different variances), and mixed (both systematic and heteroscedastic) measurement errors. We also explore various prior choices (i.e., weakly informative or point mass) on the sensitivity parameters related to the differential measurement error. We present results from simulation studies evaluating the performance of the proposed methods and apply these approaches to an example estimating the effect of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent drug use disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1078-1096
Number of pages19
JournalPsychometrika
Volume82
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bayesian hierarchical model
  • differential measurement error
  • inverse probability of treatment weighting
  • propensity score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this