Bacterial-associated diarrhea in the dog: A critical appraisal

Stanley L Marks, Elizabeth J. Kather

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The clinical documentation of enteropathogenic bacteria causing diarrhea in dogs is clouded by the presence of many of these organisms existing as normal constituents of the indigenous intestinal flora. The diagnosis of a putative bacterial enteropathogen(s) in dogs should be made based on a combination of parameters, including signalment and predisposing factors, clinical signs, serologic assays for toxins, fecal culture, and PCR. Relying on results of fecal culture alone is problematic, because C perfringens, C difficile, Campylobacter spp, and pathogenic and non-pathogenic E coli are commonly isolated from apparently healthy dogs [10,13,33]. Nevertheless, culture may be useful in procuring isolates for the application of molecular techniques, such as PCR, for detection of specific toxin genes or molecular typing of isolated strains to establish clonality in suspected outbreaks. The oversimplistic attempt to characterize bacterially associated diarrhea by anatomic localization of clinical signs should be discouraged, because most of the previously mentioned bacteria have been associated with small and large intestinal diarrhea. Accurate diagnosis of infections may require diagnostic laboratories to incorporate PCR-based assays using genus- and species-specific primers to facilitate detection of toxin genes and differentiation of species that appear phenotypically and biochemically similar. There has been tremendous interest in the application of microarray technology for the simultaneous detection of thousands of genes or target DNA sequences on one glass slide. This powerful tool could be used for detection of specific pathogenic bacterial strains in fecal specimens obtained from dogs in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1029-1060
Number of pages32
JournalVeterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003

Fingerprint

Diarrhea
diarrhea
Dogs
toxins
dogs
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Genes
enteropathogens
Bacteria
Molecular Typing
microarray technology
Campylobacter
genes
bacteria
assays
intestinal microorganisms
Causality
Documentation
Glass
Disease Outbreaks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Bacterial-associated diarrhea in the dog : A critical appraisal. / Marks, Stanley L; Kather, Elizabeth J.

In: Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice, Vol. 33, No. 5, 09.2003, p. 1029-1060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90d0b9a94ffd46fda2c13f084255f5c8,
title = "Bacterial-associated diarrhea in the dog: A critical appraisal",
abstract = "The clinical documentation of enteropathogenic bacteria causing diarrhea in dogs is clouded by the presence of many of these organisms existing as normal constituents of the indigenous intestinal flora. The diagnosis of a putative bacterial enteropathogen(s) in dogs should be made based on a combination of parameters, including signalment and predisposing factors, clinical signs, serologic assays for toxins, fecal culture, and PCR. Relying on results of fecal culture alone is problematic, because C perfringens, C difficile, Campylobacter spp, and pathogenic and non-pathogenic E coli are commonly isolated from apparently healthy dogs [10,13,33]. Nevertheless, culture may be useful in procuring isolates for the application of molecular techniques, such as PCR, for detection of specific toxin genes or molecular typing of isolated strains to establish clonality in suspected outbreaks. The oversimplistic attempt to characterize bacterially associated diarrhea by anatomic localization of clinical signs should be discouraged, because most of the previously mentioned bacteria have been associated with small and large intestinal diarrhea. Accurate diagnosis of infections may require diagnostic laboratories to incorporate PCR-based assays using genus- and species-specific primers to facilitate detection of toxin genes and differentiation of species that appear phenotypically and biochemically similar. There has been tremendous interest in the application of microarray technology for the simultaneous detection of thousands of genes or target DNA sequences on one glass slide. This powerful tool could be used for detection of specific pathogenic bacterial strains in fecal specimens obtained from dogs in the future.",
author = "Marks, {Stanley L} and Kather, {Elizabeth J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0195-5616(03)00091-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1029--1060",
journal = "Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice",
issn = "0195-5616",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bacterial-associated diarrhea in the dog

T2 - A critical appraisal

AU - Marks, Stanley L

AU - Kather, Elizabeth J.

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - The clinical documentation of enteropathogenic bacteria causing diarrhea in dogs is clouded by the presence of many of these organisms existing as normal constituents of the indigenous intestinal flora. The diagnosis of a putative bacterial enteropathogen(s) in dogs should be made based on a combination of parameters, including signalment and predisposing factors, clinical signs, serologic assays for toxins, fecal culture, and PCR. Relying on results of fecal culture alone is problematic, because C perfringens, C difficile, Campylobacter spp, and pathogenic and non-pathogenic E coli are commonly isolated from apparently healthy dogs [10,13,33]. Nevertheless, culture may be useful in procuring isolates for the application of molecular techniques, such as PCR, for detection of specific toxin genes or molecular typing of isolated strains to establish clonality in suspected outbreaks. The oversimplistic attempt to characterize bacterially associated diarrhea by anatomic localization of clinical signs should be discouraged, because most of the previously mentioned bacteria have been associated with small and large intestinal diarrhea. Accurate diagnosis of infections may require diagnostic laboratories to incorporate PCR-based assays using genus- and species-specific primers to facilitate detection of toxin genes and differentiation of species that appear phenotypically and biochemically similar. There has been tremendous interest in the application of microarray technology for the simultaneous detection of thousands of genes or target DNA sequences on one glass slide. This powerful tool could be used for detection of specific pathogenic bacterial strains in fecal specimens obtained from dogs in the future.

AB - The clinical documentation of enteropathogenic bacteria causing diarrhea in dogs is clouded by the presence of many of these organisms existing as normal constituents of the indigenous intestinal flora. The diagnosis of a putative bacterial enteropathogen(s) in dogs should be made based on a combination of parameters, including signalment and predisposing factors, clinical signs, serologic assays for toxins, fecal culture, and PCR. Relying on results of fecal culture alone is problematic, because C perfringens, C difficile, Campylobacter spp, and pathogenic and non-pathogenic E coli are commonly isolated from apparently healthy dogs [10,13,33]. Nevertheless, culture may be useful in procuring isolates for the application of molecular techniques, such as PCR, for detection of specific toxin genes or molecular typing of isolated strains to establish clonality in suspected outbreaks. The oversimplistic attempt to characterize bacterially associated diarrhea by anatomic localization of clinical signs should be discouraged, because most of the previously mentioned bacteria have been associated with small and large intestinal diarrhea. Accurate diagnosis of infections may require diagnostic laboratories to incorporate PCR-based assays using genus- and species-specific primers to facilitate detection of toxin genes and differentiation of species that appear phenotypically and biochemically similar. There has been tremendous interest in the application of microarray technology for the simultaneous detection of thousands of genes or target DNA sequences on one glass slide. This powerful tool could be used for detection of specific pathogenic bacterial strains in fecal specimens obtained from dogs in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141921472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141921472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0195-5616(03)00091-3

DO - 10.1016/S0195-5616(03)00091-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 14552160

AN - SCOPUS:0141921472

VL - 33

SP - 1029

EP - 1060

JO - Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice

JF - Veterinary Clinics of North America - Small Animal Practice

SN - 0195-5616

IS - 5

ER -