Bacteria as bullies: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health message

Robert A Bell, Matthew S. McGlone, Marko Dragojevic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When describing health threats, communicators can assign agency to the threat (e.g., "Hepatitis C has infected 4 million Americans") or to humans (e.g., "Four million Americans have contracted hepatitis C"). In an online experiment, the authors explored how assignment of agency affects perceptions of susceptibility and severity of a health threat, response efficacy, self-efficacy, fear arousal, and intentions to adopt health-protective recommendations. Participants were 719 individuals recruited through Mechanical Turk (www.mturk.com), a crowdsource labor market run by Amazon (www.amazon.com). The participants were assigned randomly to read 1 of 8 flyers defined by a 2×4 (Agency Assignment×Topic) factorial design. Each flyer examined 1 health threat (E. coli, necrotizing fasciitis, salmonella, or Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) and was written in language that emphasized bacterial or human agency. Perceived susceptibility and severity were highest when bacterial agency language was used. Response efficacy, self-efficacy, and fear arousal were not significantly affected by agency assignment. Participants reported stronger intentions to adopt recommendations when bacteria agency language was used, but this effect did not reach conventional standards of significance (p <.051). The authors concluded that health communicators can increase target audiences' perceptions of susceptibility and severity by assigning agency to the threat in question when devising health messages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)340-358
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Bullying
Linguistics
Bacteria
Health
linguistics
threat
health
Language
communicator
Self Efficacy
Hepatitis C
Arousal
Fear
contagious disease
self-efficacy
Crowdsourcing
language
anxiety
Necrotizing Fasciitis
Carbapenems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Communication

Cite this

Bacteria as bullies : Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health message. / Bell, Robert A; McGlone, Matthew S.; Dragojevic, Marko.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 340-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bell, Robert A ; McGlone, Matthew S. ; Dragojevic, Marko. / Bacteria as bullies : Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health message. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 340-358.
@article{e32804eb327d473ebc4b6e08f4aff68c,
title = "Bacteria as bullies: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health message",
abstract = "When describing health threats, communicators can assign agency to the threat (e.g., {"}Hepatitis C has infected 4 million Americans{"}) or to humans (e.g., {"}Four million Americans have contracted hepatitis C{"}). In an online experiment, the authors explored how assignment of agency affects perceptions of susceptibility and severity of a health threat, response efficacy, self-efficacy, fear arousal, and intentions to adopt health-protective recommendations. Participants were 719 individuals recruited through Mechanical Turk (www.mturk.com), a crowdsource labor market run by Amazon (www.amazon.com). The participants were assigned randomly to read 1 of 8 flyers defined by a 2×4 (Agency Assignment×Topic) factorial design. Each flyer examined 1 health threat (E. coli, necrotizing fasciitis, salmonella, or Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) and was written in language that emphasized bacterial or human agency. Perceived susceptibility and severity were highest when bacterial agency language was used. Response efficacy, self-efficacy, and fear arousal were not significantly affected by agency assignment. Participants reported stronger intentions to adopt recommendations when bacteria agency language was used, but this effect did not reach conventional standards of significance (p <.051). The authors concluded that health communicators can increase target audiences' perceptions of susceptibility and severity by assigning agency to the threat in question when devising health messages.",
author = "Bell, {Robert A} and McGlone, {Matthew S.} and Marko Dragojevic",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2013.798383",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "340--358",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bacteria as bullies

T2 - Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health message

AU - Bell, Robert A

AU - McGlone, Matthew S.

AU - Dragojevic, Marko

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - When describing health threats, communicators can assign agency to the threat (e.g., "Hepatitis C has infected 4 million Americans") or to humans (e.g., "Four million Americans have contracted hepatitis C"). In an online experiment, the authors explored how assignment of agency affects perceptions of susceptibility and severity of a health threat, response efficacy, self-efficacy, fear arousal, and intentions to adopt health-protective recommendations. Participants were 719 individuals recruited through Mechanical Turk (www.mturk.com), a crowdsource labor market run by Amazon (www.amazon.com). The participants were assigned randomly to read 1 of 8 flyers defined by a 2×4 (Agency Assignment×Topic) factorial design. Each flyer examined 1 health threat (E. coli, necrotizing fasciitis, salmonella, or Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) and was written in language that emphasized bacterial or human agency. Perceived susceptibility and severity were highest when bacterial agency language was used. Response efficacy, self-efficacy, and fear arousal were not significantly affected by agency assignment. Participants reported stronger intentions to adopt recommendations when bacteria agency language was used, but this effect did not reach conventional standards of significance (p <.051). The authors concluded that health communicators can increase target audiences' perceptions of susceptibility and severity by assigning agency to the threat in question when devising health messages.

AB - When describing health threats, communicators can assign agency to the threat (e.g., "Hepatitis C has infected 4 million Americans") or to humans (e.g., "Four million Americans have contracted hepatitis C"). In an online experiment, the authors explored how assignment of agency affects perceptions of susceptibility and severity of a health threat, response efficacy, self-efficacy, fear arousal, and intentions to adopt health-protective recommendations. Participants were 719 individuals recruited through Mechanical Turk (www.mturk.com), a crowdsource labor market run by Amazon (www.amazon.com). The participants were assigned randomly to read 1 of 8 flyers defined by a 2×4 (Agency Assignment×Topic) factorial design. Each flyer examined 1 health threat (E. coli, necrotizing fasciitis, salmonella, or Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) and was written in language that emphasized bacterial or human agency. Perceived susceptibility and severity were highest when bacterial agency language was used. Response efficacy, self-efficacy, and fear arousal were not significantly affected by agency assignment. Participants reported stronger intentions to adopt recommendations when bacteria agency language was used, but this effect did not reach conventional standards of significance (p <.051). The authors concluded that health communicators can increase target audiences' perceptions of susceptibility and severity by assigning agency to the threat in question when devising health messages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897653043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897653043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2013.798383

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2013.798383

M3 - Article

C2 - 24015807

AN - SCOPUS:84897653043

VL - 19

SP - 340

EP - 358

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - 3

ER -