Background Checks For Firearm Purchases: Problem Areas And Recommendations To Improve Effectiveness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Mandatory background checks on firearm purchasers receive widespread support from the general public and firearm owners. Background checks appear to reduce the risk of violence substantially among prohibited persons whose purchases are denied. However, population-level studies, including studies of comprehensive background check policies, have often shown no clear evidence of benefit. There is one notable exception: Permit-to-purchase policies have consistently been associated with beneficial population-level effects. The findings of no benefit may in part be an artifact of history, as the completeness of the data on which background checks are run has improved substantially since the periods examined by those studies. Nonetheless, significant problems with implementation and design still limit the population-level effectiveness of background check policies. In this article I review nine of these problem areas and suggest actions that could substantially improve the effectiveness of background check policies in preventing firearm-related violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1702-1710
Number of pages9
JournalHealth affairs (Project Hope)
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019


  • Access to care
  • Background checks
  • Firearms
  • Guns
  • Health policy
  • Law enforcement
  • Legal and regulatory issues
  • Mental disorders
  • Mental health
  • Public health
  • Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy


Dive into the research topics of 'Background Checks For Firearm Purchases: Problem Areas And Recommendations To Improve Effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this