Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms

Andrew M. Hernandez, John M Boone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To design volume-specific breast phantoms from breast CT (bCT) data sets and estimate the associated normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for breast CT using Monte Carlo methods. Methods: A large cohort of bCT data sets (N = 215) was used to evaluate breast volume into quintiles (plus the top 5%). The average radius profile was then determined for each of the six volume-specific groups and used to both fabricate physical phantoms and generate mathematical phantoms (V1-V6; "V" denotes classification by volume). The MCNP6 Monte Carlo code was used to model a prototype bCT system fabricated at our institution; and this model was validated against physical measurements in the fabricated phantoms. The mathematical phantoms were used to simulate normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for both monoenergetic source photons "DgNCT(E)" (8-70 keV in 1 keV intervals) and polyenergetic x-ray beams "pDgNCT" (35-70 kV in 1 kV intervals). The Monte Carlo code was used to study the influence of breast size (V1 vs. V5) and glandular fraction (6.4% vs. 45.8%) on glandular dose. The pDgNCT coefficients estimated for the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms were also compared to those generated using simple, cylindrical phantoms with equivalent volume and two geometrical constraints including; (a) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom chest wall "Rcw"; and (b) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom center-of-mass "RCOM". Results: Satisfactory agreement was observed for dose estimations using MCNP6 compared with both physical measurements in the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms (R2 = 0.995) and reference bCT dose coefficients using simple phantoms (R2 = 0.999). For a 49 kV spectrum with 1.5 mm Al filtration, differences in glandular fraction [6.5% (5th percentile) vs. 45.8% (95th percentile)] had a 13.2% influence on pDgNCT for the V3 phantom, and differences in breast size (V1 vs. V5) had a 16.6% influence on pDgNCT for a breast composed of 17% (median) fibroglandular tissue. For cylindrical phantoms with a radius of RCOM, the differences were 1.5%, 0.1%, and 2.1% compared with the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms, respectively. Conclusion: Breast phantoms were designed using a large cohort of bCT data sets across a range of six breast sizes. These phantoms were then fabricated and used for the estimation of glandular dose in breast CT. The mathematical phantoms and associated glandular dose coefficients for a range of breast sizes (V1-V6) and glandular fractions (5th to 95th percentiles) are available for interested users.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5096-5105
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Physics
Volume44
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Breast
Monte Carlo Method
Thoracic Wall
Photons
X-Rays

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • breast computed tomography
  • dosimetry
  • glandular breast dose
  • x-ray imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms. / Hernandez, Andrew M.; Boone, John M.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 44, No. 10, 01.10.2017, p. 5096-5105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89081ff1111f4ae08781974fcfa97ee2,
title = "Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms",
abstract = "Purpose: To design volume-specific breast phantoms from breast CT (bCT) data sets and estimate the associated normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for breast CT using Monte Carlo methods. Methods: A large cohort of bCT data sets (N = 215) was used to evaluate breast volume into quintiles (plus the top 5{\%}). The average radius profile was then determined for each of the six volume-specific groups and used to both fabricate physical phantoms and generate mathematical phantoms (V1-V6; {"}V{"} denotes classification by volume). The MCNP6 Monte Carlo code was used to model a prototype bCT system fabricated at our institution; and this model was validated against physical measurements in the fabricated phantoms. The mathematical phantoms were used to simulate normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for both monoenergetic source photons {"}DgNCT(E){"} (8-70 keV in 1 keV intervals) and polyenergetic x-ray beams {"}pDgNCT{"} (35-70 kV in 1 kV intervals). The Monte Carlo code was used to study the influence of breast size (V1 vs. V5) and glandular fraction (6.4{\%} vs. 45.8{\%}) on glandular dose. The pDgNCT coefficients estimated for the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms were also compared to those generated using simple, cylindrical phantoms with equivalent volume and two geometrical constraints including; (a) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom chest wall {"}Rcw{"}; and (b) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom center-of-mass {"}RCOM{"}. Results: Satisfactory agreement was observed for dose estimations using MCNP6 compared with both physical measurements in the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms (R2 = 0.995) and reference bCT dose coefficients using simple phantoms (R2 = 0.999). For a 49 kV spectrum with 1.5 mm Al filtration, differences in glandular fraction [6.5{\%} (5th percentile) vs. 45.8{\%} (95th percentile)] had a 13.2{\%} influence on pDgNCT for the V3 phantom, and differences in breast size (V1 vs. V5) had a 16.6{\%} influence on pDgNCT for a breast composed of 17{\%} (median) fibroglandular tissue. For cylindrical phantoms with a radius of RCOM, the differences were 1.5{\%}, 0.1{\%}, and 2.1{\%} compared with the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms, respectively. Conclusion: Breast phantoms were designed using a large cohort of bCT data sets across a range of six breast sizes. These phantoms were then fabricated and used for the estimation of glandular dose in breast CT. The mathematical phantoms and associated glandular dose coefficients for a range of breast sizes (V1-V6) and glandular fractions (5th to 95th percentiles) are available for interested users.",
keywords = "breast cancer, breast computed tomography, dosimetry, glandular breast dose, x-ray imaging",
author = "Hernandez, {Andrew M.} and Boone, {John M}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mp.12477",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "5096--5105",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms

AU - Hernandez, Andrew M.

AU - Boone, John M

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Purpose: To design volume-specific breast phantoms from breast CT (bCT) data sets and estimate the associated normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for breast CT using Monte Carlo methods. Methods: A large cohort of bCT data sets (N = 215) was used to evaluate breast volume into quintiles (plus the top 5%). The average radius profile was then determined for each of the six volume-specific groups and used to both fabricate physical phantoms and generate mathematical phantoms (V1-V6; "V" denotes classification by volume). The MCNP6 Monte Carlo code was used to model a prototype bCT system fabricated at our institution; and this model was validated against physical measurements in the fabricated phantoms. The mathematical phantoms were used to simulate normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for both monoenergetic source photons "DgNCT(E)" (8-70 keV in 1 keV intervals) and polyenergetic x-ray beams "pDgNCT" (35-70 kV in 1 kV intervals). The Monte Carlo code was used to study the influence of breast size (V1 vs. V5) and glandular fraction (6.4% vs. 45.8%) on glandular dose. The pDgNCT coefficients estimated for the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms were also compared to those generated using simple, cylindrical phantoms with equivalent volume and two geometrical constraints including; (a) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom chest wall "Rcw"; and (b) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom center-of-mass "RCOM". Results: Satisfactory agreement was observed for dose estimations using MCNP6 compared with both physical measurements in the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms (R2 = 0.995) and reference bCT dose coefficients using simple phantoms (R2 = 0.999). For a 49 kV spectrum with 1.5 mm Al filtration, differences in glandular fraction [6.5% (5th percentile) vs. 45.8% (95th percentile)] had a 13.2% influence on pDgNCT for the V3 phantom, and differences in breast size (V1 vs. V5) had a 16.6% influence on pDgNCT for a breast composed of 17% (median) fibroglandular tissue. For cylindrical phantoms with a radius of RCOM, the differences were 1.5%, 0.1%, and 2.1% compared with the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms, respectively. Conclusion: Breast phantoms were designed using a large cohort of bCT data sets across a range of six breast sizes. These phantoms were then fabricated and used for the estimation of glandular dose in breast CT. The mathematical phantoms and associated glandular dose coefficients for a range of breast sizes (V1-V6) and glandular fractions (5th to 95th percentiles) are available for interested users.

AB - Purpose: To design volume-specific breast phantoms from breast CT (bCT) data sets and estimate the associated normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for breast CT using Monte Carlo methods. Methods: A large cohort of bCT data sets (N = 215) was used to evaluate breast volume into quintiles (plus the top 5%). The average radius profile was then determined for each of the six volume-specific groups and used to both fabricate physical phantoms and generate mathematical phantoms (V1-V6; "V" denotes classification by volume). The MCNP6 Monte Carlo code was used to model a prototype bCT system fabricated at our institution; and this model was validated against physical measurements in the fabricated phantoms. The mathematical phantoms were used to simulate normalized mean glandular dose coefficients for both monoenergetic source photons "DgNCT(E)" (8-70 keV in 1 keV intervals) and polyenergetic x-ray beams "pDgNCT" (35-70 kV in 1 kV intervals). The Monte Carlo code was used to study the influence of breast size (V1 vs. V5) and glandular fraction (6.4% vs. 45.8%) on glandular dose. The pDgNCT coefficients estimated for the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms were also compared to those generated using simple, cylindrical phantoms with equivalent volume and two geometrical constraints including; (a) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom chest wall "Rcw"; and (b) cylinder radius determined at the breast phantom center-of-mass "RCOM". Results: Satisfactory agreement was observed for dose estimations using MCNP6 compared with both physical measurements in the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms (R2 = 0.995) and reference bCT dose coefficients using simple phantoms (R2 = 0.999). For a 49 kV spectrum with 1.5 mm Al filtration, differences in glandular fraction [6.5% (5th percentile) vs. 45.8% (95th percentile)] had a 13.2% influence on pDgNCT for the V3 phantom, and differences in breast size (V1 vs. V5) had a 16.6% influence on pDgNCT for a breast composed of 17% (median) fibroglandular tissue. For cylindrical phantoms with a radius of RCOM, the differences were 1.5%, 0.1%, and 2.1% compared with the V1, V3, and V5 phantoms, respectively. Conclusion: Breast phantoms were designed using a large cohort of bCT data sets across a range of six breast sizes. These phantoms were then fabricated and used for the estimation of glandular dose in breast CT. The mathematical phantoms and associated glandular dose coefficients for a range of breast sizes (V1-V6) and glandular fractions (5th to 95th percentiles) are available for interested users.

KW - breast cancer

KW - breast computed tomography

KW - dosimetry

KW - glandular breast dose

KW - x-ray imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031285801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031285801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mp.12477

DO - 10.1002/mp.12477

M3 - Article

C2 - 28715130

AN - SCOPUS:85031285801

VL - 44

SP - 5096

EP - 5105

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 10

ER -