Automatic Antecedents of Discrimination

Jenny Roth, Roland Deutsch, Jeffrey Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In increasingly diverse societies, discrimination against social groups and their members continues to be a public and political concern. Research has addressed three basic cognitive processes that precede discrimination: categorization, stereotype/prejudice activation, and stereotype/prejudice application, suggesting that these processes occur in an automatic fashion. However, there are multiple components of automaticity, including unawareness, efficiency, unintentionality, and uncontrollability. Most of the previous research implies that these components of automaticity converge with respect to cognitive antecedents of discrimination. Here, we review evidence on the distinct components of automaticity in order to assess whether (a) categorization, (b) stereotype/prejudice activation, and (c) stereotype/prejudice application occur (1) without awareness, (2) efficiently, and (3) goal-independently. We highlight evidence indicating convergence or divergence of the automaticity components during each of the processing stages. This analysis provides readers with an up-to-date review that helps to evaluate whether a multi-component approach to automaticity is of additional benefit in aggregating knowledge about the cognitive antecedents of discrimination. We discuss open issues and avenues for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Psychologist
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 30 2018

Fingerprint

Research
Discrimination
Automaticity
Stereotypes
Prejudice
Activation
Social Groups
Unawareness
Divergence
Cognitive Processes
Reader

Keywords

  • automaticity
  • categorization
  • stereotype/prejudice activation
  • stereotype/prejudice application
  • stereotyping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Automatic Antecedents of Discrimination. / Roth, Jenny; Deutsch, Roland; Sherman, Jeffrey.

In: European Psychologist, 30.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c81d0531fbf43e29c31c68dc2825020,
title = "Automatic Antecedents of Discrimination",
abstract = "In increasingly diverse societies, discrimination against social groups and their members continues to be a public and political concern. Research has addressed three basic cognitive processes that precede discrimination: categorization, stereotype/prejudice activation, and stereotype/prejudice application, suggesting that these processes occur in an automatic fashion. However, there are multiple components of automaticity, including unawareness, efficiency, unintentionality, and uncontrollability. Most of the previous research implies that these components of automaticity converge with respect to cognitive antecedents of discrimination. Here, we review evidence on the distinct components of automaticity in order to assess whether (a) categorization, (b) stereotype/prejudice activation, and (c) stereotype/prejudice application occur (1) without awareness, (2) efficiently, and (3) goal-independently. We highlight evidence indicating convergence or divergence of the automaticity components during each of the processing stages. This analysis provides readers with an up-to-date review that helps to evaluate whether a multi-component approach to automaticity is of additional benefit in aggregating knowledge about the cognitive antecedents of discrimination. We discuss open issues and avenues for future research.",
keywords = "automaticity, categorization, stereotype/prejudice activation, stereotype/prejudice application, stereotyping",
author = "Jenny Roth and Roland Deutsch and Jeffrey Sherman",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1027/1016-9040/a000321",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "European Psychologist",
issn = "1016-9040",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automatic Antecedents of Discrimination

AU - Roth, Jenny

AU - Deutsch, Roland

AU - Sherman, Jeffrey

PY - 2018/5/30

Y1 - 2018/5/30

N2 - In increasingly diverse societies, discrimination against social groups and their members continues to be a public and political concern. Research has addressed three basic cognitive processes that precede discrimination: categorization, stereotype/prejudice activation, and stereotype/prejudice application, suggesting that these processes occur in an automatic fashion. However, there are multiple components of automaticity, including unawareness, efficiency, unintentionality, and uncontrollability. Most of the previous research implies that these components of automaticity converge with respect to cognitive antecedents of discrimination. Here, we review evidence on the distinct components of automaticity in order to assess whether (a) categorization, (b) stereotype/prejudice activation, and (c) stereotype/prejudice application occur (1) without awareness, (2) efficiently, and (3) goal-independently. We highlight evidence indicating convergence or divergence of the automaticity components during each of the processing stages. This analysis provides readers with an up-to-date review that helps to evaluate whether a multi-component approach to automaticity is of additional benefit in aggregating knowledge about the cognitive antecedents of discrimination. We discuss open issues and avenues for future research.

AB - In increasingly diverse societies, discrimination against social groups and their members continues to be a public and political concern. Research has addressed three basic cognitive processes that precede discrimination: categorization, stereotype/prejudice activation, and stereotype/prejudice application, suggesting that these processes occur in an automatic fashion. However, there are multiple components of automaticity, including unawareness, efficiency, unintentionality, and uncontrollability. Most of the previous research implies that these components of automaticity converge with respect to cognitive antecedents of discrimination. Here, we review evidence on the distinct components of automaticity in order to assess whether (a) categorization, (b) stereotype/prejudice activation, and (c) stereotype/prejudice application occur (1) without awareness, (2) efficiently, and (3) goal-independently. We highlight evidence indicating convergence or divergence of the automaticity components during each of the processing stages. This analysis provides readers with an up-to-date review that helps to evaluate whether a multi-component approach to automaticity is of additional benefit in aggregating knowledge about the cognitive antecedents of discrimination. We discuss open issues and avenues for future research.

KW - automaticity

KW - categorization

KW - stereotype/prejudice activation

KW - stereotype/prejudice application

KW - stereotyping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048394543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048394543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000321

DO - 10.1027/1016-9040/a000321

M3 - Article

JO - European Psychologist

JF - European Psychologist

SN - 1016-9040

ER -