Attenuation of social class and reproductive risk factor associations for Hodgkin lymphoma due to selection bias in controls

Sally L. Glaser, Christina A. Clarke, Theresa H Keegan, Scarlett L. Gomez, Rebecca A. Nugent, Barbara Topol, Cynthia B. Stearns, Susan L Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) risk has been linked with higher social class and lower parity, but our prior population-based case-control study in adult women had unexpected null findings for these variables. Because subject participation was 87% for cases but 65% for random digit-dialing (RDD) controls, we examined representativeness of our controls and the impact of detected bias on prior results. Methods: Using data from RDD enumeration, abbreviated interviews with nonparticipating controls, and the US census, we compared participating and nonparticipating RDD controls across several age groups and then recomputed odds ratios for risk factor associations adjusted for bias. Results: The 325 RDD control participants were younger, more likely to be white, better educated, and of lower birth order and lower parity than the nonparticipants. Adjustment of odds ratios for bias strengthened previously null findings for education and for parity, breast-feeding and miscarriages in young adult women; these latter changes eliminated previously apparent age modification of risks. Conclusions: Selection bias in female RDD controls resulted from differential participation by socioeconomic factors, varied with age, and produced underestimations of several associations in young women, including reproductive factors. Thus, our prior conclusions of etiologic irrelevance for some study variables may have been inaccurate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-739
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Selection Bias
Parity
Hodgkin Disease
Social Class
Odds Ratio
Social Adjustment
Birth Order
Spontaneous Abortion
Censuses
Breast Feeding
Case-Control Studies
Young Adult
Age Groups
Interviews
Education
Population

Keywords

  • case-control studies
  • Hodgkin lymphoma
  • reproductive factors
  • selection bias
  • socioeconomic status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Epidemiology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Attenuation of social class and reproductive risk factor associations for Hodgkin lymphoma due to selection bias in controls. / Glaser, Sally L.; Clarke, Christina A.; Keegan, Theresa H; Gomez, Scarlett L.; Nugent, Rebecca A.; Topol, Barbara; Stearns, Cynthia B.; Stewart, Susan L.

In: Cancer Causes and Control, Vol. 15, No. 7, 09.2004, p. 731-739.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glaser, Sally L. ; Clarke, Christina A. ; Keegan, Theresa H ; Gomez, Scarlett L. ; Nugent, Rebecca A. ; Topol, Barbara ; Stearns, Cynthia B. ; Stewart, Susan L. / Attenuation of social class and reproductive risk factor associations for Hodgkin lymphoma due to selection bias in controls. In: Cancer Causes and Control. 2004 ; Vol. 15, No. 7. pp. 731-739.
@article{efb8d1a0c1384fa8994220a7901a9a56,
title = "Attenuation of social class and reproductive risk factor associations for Hodgkin lymphoma due to selection bias in controls",
abstract = "Objective: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) risk has been linked with higher social class and lower parity, but our prior population-based case-control study in adult women had unexpected null findings for these variables. Because subject participation was 87{\%} for cases but 65{\%} for random digit-dialing (RDD) controls, we examined representativeness of our controls and the impact of detected bias on prior results. Methods: Using data from RDD enumeration, abbreviated interviews with nonparticipating controls, and the US census, we compared participating and nonparticipating RDD controls across several age groups and then recomputed odds ratios for risk factor associations adjusted for bias. Results: The 325 RDD control participants were younger, more likely to be white, better educated, and of lower birth order and lower parity than the nonparticipants. Adjustment of odds ratios for bias strengthened previously null findings for education and for parity, breast-feeding and miscarriages in young adult women; these latter changes eliminated previously apparent age modification of risks. Conclusions: Selection bias in female RDD controls resulted from differential participation by socioeconomic factors, varied with age, and produced underestimations of several associations in young women, including reproductive factors. Thus, our prior conclusions of etiologic irrelevance for some study variables may have been inaccurate.",
keywords = "case-control studies, Hodgkin lymphoma, reproductive factors, selection bias, socioeconomic status",
author = "Glaser, {Sally L.} and Clarke, {Christina A.} and Keegan, {Theresa H} and Gomez, {Scarlett L.} and Nugent, {Rebecca A.} and Barbara Topol and Stearns, {Cynthia B.} and Stewart, {Susan L}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1023/B:CACO.0000036191.79739.98",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "731--739",
journal = "Cancer Causes and Control",
issn = "0957-5243",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attenuation of social class and reproductive risk factor associations for Hodgkin lymphoma due to selection bias in controls

AU - Glaser, Sally L.

AU - Clarke, Christina A.

AU - Keegan, Theresa H

AU - Gomez, Scarlett L.

AU - Nugent, Rebecca A.

AU - Topol, Barbara

AU - Stearns, Cynthia B.

AU - Stewart, Susan L

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Objective: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) risk has been linked with higher social class and lower parity, but our prior population-based case-control study in adult women had unexpected null findings for these variables. Because subject participation was 87% for cases but 65% for random digit-dialing (RDD) controls, we examined representativeness of our controls and the impact of detected bias on prior results. Methods: Using data from RDD enumeration, abbreviated interviews with nonparticipating controls, and the US census, we compared participating and nonparticipating RDD controls across several age groups and then recomputed odds ratios for risk factor associations adjusted for bias. Results: The 325 RDD control participants were younger, more likely to be white, better educated, and of lower birth order and lower parity than the nonparticipants. Adjustment of odds ratios for bias strengthened previously null findings for education and for parity, breast-feeding and miscarriages in young adult women; these latter changes eliminated previously apparent age modification of risks. Conclusions: Selection bias in female RDD controls resulted from differential participation by socioeconomic factors, varied with age, and produced underestimations of several associations in young women, including reproductive factors. Thus, our prior conclusions of etiologic irrelevance for some study variables may have been inaccurate.

AB - Objective: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) risk has been linked with higher social class and lower parity, but our prior population-based case-control study in adult women had unexpected null findings for these variables. Because subject participation was 87% for cases but 65% for random digit-dialing (RDD) controls, we examined representativeness of our controls and the impact of detected bias on prior results. Methods: Using data from RDD enumeration, abbreviated interviews with nonparticipating controls, and the US census, we compared participating and nonparticipating RDD controls across several age groups and then recomputed odds ratios for risk factor associations adjusted for bias. Results: The 325 RDD control participants were younger, more likely to be white, better educated, and of lower birth order and lower parity than the nonparticipants. Adjustment of odds ratios for bias strengthened previously null findings for education and for parity, breast-feeding and miscarriages in young adult women; these latter changes eliminated previously apparent age modification of risks. Conclusions: Selection bias in female RDD controls resulted from differential participation by socioeconomic factors, varied with age, and produced underestimations of several associations in young women, including reproductive factors. Thus, our prior conclusions of etiologic irrelevance for some study variables may have been inaccurate.

KW - case-control studies

KW - Hodgkin lymphoma

KW - reproductive factors

KW - selection bias

KW - socioeconomic status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043126848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043126848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036191.79739.98

DO - 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036191.79739.98

M3 - Article

C2 - 15280631

AN - SCOPUS:4043126848

VL - 15

SP - 731

EP - 739

JO - Cancer Causes and Control

JF - Cancer Causes and Control

SN - 0957-5243

IS - 7

ER -