Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space

An electrophysiological analysis

Hans Jochen Heinze, Steven J. Luck, Thomas F. Munte, Annette Gös, George R Mangun, Steven A. Hillyard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass aunitary, continuous zone. These contrasting viewswere evaluated in an experiment 9n which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition . To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials(ERPa)were recorded to taskirrelevant "probe" stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attentionforms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-52
Number of pages11
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1994

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Brain
stimulus
suppression
brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space : An electrophysiological analysis. / Heinze, Hans Jochen; Luck, Steven J.; Munte, Thomas F.; Gös, Annette; Mangun, George R; Hillyard, Steven A.

In: Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.1994, p. 42-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heinze, Hans Jochen ; Luck, Steven J. ; Munte, Thomas F. ; Gös, Annette ; Mangun, George R ; Hillyard, Steven A. / Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space : An electrophysiological analysis. In: Perception & Psychophysics. 1994 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 42-52.
@article{f13f2abc30b74fe8a92fac321a8ddad9,
title = "Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis",
abstract = "Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass aunitary, continuous zone. These contrasting viewswere evaluated in an experiment 9n which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition . To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials(ERPa)were recorded to taskirrelevant {"}probe{"} stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attentionforms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.",
author = "Heinze, {Hans Jochen} and Luck, {Steven J.} and Munte, {Thomas F.} and Annette G{\"o}s and Mangun, {George R} and Hillyard, {Steven A.}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03211689",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "42--52",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space

T2 - An electrophysiological analysis

AU - Heinze, Hans Jochen

AU - Luck, Steven J.

AU - Munte, Thomas F.

AU - Gös, Annette

AU - Mangun, George R

AU - Hillyard, Steven A.

PY - 1994/1

Y1 - 1994/1

N2 - Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass aunitary, continuous zone. These contrasting viewswere evaluated in an experiment 9n which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition . To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials(ERPa)were recorded to taskirrelevant "probe" stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attentionforms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.

AB - Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass aunitary, continuous zone. These contrasting viewswere evaluated in an experiment 9n which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition . To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials(ERPa)were recorded to taskirrelevant "probe" stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attentionforms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028472154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028472154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03211689

DO - 10.3758/BF03211689

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 42

EP - 52

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 1

ER -