Attention and Stereotyping: Cognitive Constraints on the Construction of Meaningful Social Impressions

Jeffrey Sherman, C. Neil Macrae, Galen V. Bodenhausen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the role of attentional capacity in stereotyping processes. We begin with an overview of different theoretical perspectives on this issue. Then we document how recent research has extended our understanding of the relationship between attention and stereotyping. First, we consider how variations in attentional resources influence social categorization, stereotype activation, stereotype application, and stereotype inhibition. Evidence from each of these domains supports the conclusion that stereotype-based impression formation is less resource-consuming than individuation. Second, we examine the role of attentional capacity in the encoding, retrieval, and meta-cognitive processing of stereotypical and counter-stereotypical information. Recent research extends our understanding of exactly how and why stereotype use is relatively efficient. Finally, we discuss the need to better specify the conditions under which attention is and is not likely to be impaired. New evidence suggests that such considerations have important implications for understanding stereotyping. We conclude that there is now an abundant variety of evidence underscoring the importance of attentional resources in stereotyping. Such a general characteristic of human functioning as limited attentional capacity should have an important role to play in thought and action (Mandler, 1985, p. 66). … human attempts to understand the physical or biological environment… work(s) within the limits imposed by the capacities of individual human minds … A “satisfactory” explanation will manage to preserve personal integrity while at the same time-for reasons of cognitive economy-it will tend towards as much simplification as the situation allows for (Tajfel, 1969, pp. 79,92).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-175
Number of pages31
JournalEuropean Review of Social Psychology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stereotyping
Individuation
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Attention and Stereotyping : Cognitive Constraints on the Construction of Meaningful Social Impressions. / Sherman, Jeffrey; Macrae, C. Neil; Bodenhausen, Galen V.

In: European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 145-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9ce9bb91caca4d3494492fb970cb4d24,
title = "Attention and Stereotyping: Cognitive Constraints on the Construction of Meaningful Social Impressions",
abstract = "This paper examines the role of attentional capacity in stereotyping processes. We begin with an overview of different theoretical perspectives on this issue. Then we document how recent research has extended our understanding of the relationship between attention and stereotyping. First, we consider how variations in attentional resources influence social categorization, stereotype activation, stereotype application, and stereotype inhibition. Evidence from each of these domains supports the conclusion that stereotype-based impression formation is less resource-consuming than individuation. Second, we examine the role of attentional capacity in the encoding, retrieval, and meta-cognitive processing of stereotypical and counter-stereotypical information. Recent research extends our understanding of exactly how and why stereotype use is relatively efficient. Finally, we discuss the need to better specify the conditions under which attention is and is not likely to be impaired. New evidence suggests that such considerations have important implications for understanding stereotyping. We conclude that there is now an abundant variety of evidence underscoring the importance of attentional resources in stereotyping. Such a general characteristic of human functioning as limited attentional capacity should have an important role to play in thought and action (Mandler, 1985, p. 66). … human attempts to understand the physical or biological environment… work(s) within the limits imposed by the capacities of individual human minds … A “satisfactory” explanation will manage to preserve personal integrity while at the same time-for reasons of cognitive economy-it will tend towards as much simplification as the situation allows for (Tajfel, 1969, pp. 79,92).",
author = "Jeffrey Sherman and Macrae, {C. Neil} and Bodenhausen, {Galen V.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14792772043000022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "145--175",
journal = "European Review of Social Psychology",
issn = "1046-3283",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention and Stereotyping

T2 - Cognitive Constraints on the Construction of Meaningful Social Impressions

AU - Sherman, Jeffrey

AU - Macrae, C. Neil

AU - Bodenhausen, Galen V.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the role of attentional capacity in stereotyping processes. We begin with an overview of different theoretical perspectives on this issue. Then we document how recent research has extended our understanding of the relationship between attention and stereotyping. First, we consider how variations in attentional resources influence social categorization, stereotype activation, stereotype application, and stereotype inhibition. Evidence from each of these domains supports the conclusion that stereotype-based impression formation is less resource-consuming than individuation. Second, we examine the role of attentional capacity in the encoding, retrieval, and meta-cognitive processing of stereotypical and counter-stereotypical information. Recent research extends our understanding of exactly how and why stereotype use is relatively efficient. Finally, we discuss the need to better specify the conditions under which attention is and is not likely to be impaired. New evidence suggests that such considerations have important implications for understanding stereotyping. We conclude that there is now an abundant variety of evidence underscoring the importance of attentional resources in stereotyping. Such a general characteristic of human functioning as limited attentional capacity should have an important role to play in thought and action (Mandler, 1985, p. 66). … human attempts to understand the physical or biological environment… work(s) within the limits imposed by the capacities of individual human minds … A “satisfactory” explanation will manage to preserve personal integrity while at the same time-for reasons of cognitive economy-it will tend towards as much simplification as the situation allows for (Tajfel, 1969, pp. 79,92).

AB - This paper examines the role of attentional capacity in stereotyping processes. We begin with an overview of different theoretical perspectives on this issue. Then we document how recent research has extended our understanding of the relationship between attention and stereotyping. First, we consider how variations in attentional resources influence social categorization, stereotype activation, stereotype application, and stereotype inhibition. Evidence from each of these domains supports the conclusion that stereotype-based impression formation is less resource-consuming than individuation. Second, we examine the role of attentional capacity in the encoding, retrieval, and meta-cognitive processing of stereotypical and counter-stereotypical information. Recent research extends our understanding of exactly how and why stereotype use is relatively efficient. Finally, we discuss the need to better specify the conditions under which attention is and is not likely to be impaired. New evidence suggests that such considerations have important implications for understanding stereotyping. We conclude that there is now an abundant variety of evidence underscoring the importance of attentional resources in stereotyping. Such a general characteristic of human functioning as limited attentional capacity should have an important role to play in thought and action (Mandler, 1985, p. 66). … human attempts to understand the physical or biological environment… work(s) within the limits imposed by the capacities of individual human minds … A “satisfactory” explanation will manage to preserve personal integrity while at the same time-for reasons of cognitive economy-it will tend towards as much simplification as the situation allows for (Tajfel, 1969, pp. 79,92).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051111637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051111637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14792772043000022

DO - 10.1080/14792772043000022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051111637

VL - 11

SP - 145

EP - 175

JO - European Review of Social Psychology

JF - European Review of Social Psychology

SN - 1046-3283

IS - 1

ER -