Attention and emotion: Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?

C. A. Hutcherson, Philip R Goldin, K. N. Ochsner, J. D. Gabrieli, L. Feldman Barrett, J. J. Gross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging of affective systems often includes subjective self-report of the affective response. Although self-report provides valuable information regarding participants' affective responses, prior studies have raised the concern that the attentional demands of reporting on affective experience may obscure neural activations reflecting more natural affective responses. In the present study, we used potent emotion-eliciting amusing and sad films, employed a novel method of continuous self-reported rating of emotion experience, and compared the impact of rating with passive viewing of amusing and sad films. Subjective rating of ongoing emotional responses did not decrease either self-reported experience of emotion or neural activations relative to passive viewing in any brain regions. Rating, relative to passive viewing, produced increased activity in anterior cingulate, insula, and several other areas associated with introspection of emotion. These results support the use of continuous emotion measures and emotionally engaging films to study the dynamics of emotional responding and suggest that there may be some contexts in which the attention to emotion induced by reporting emotion experience does not disrupt emotional responding either behaviorally or neurally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-668
Number of pages13
JournalNeuroImage
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emotions
Self Report
Functional Neuroimaging
Gyrus Cinguli
Brain

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Emotion
  • Neural response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Hutcherson, C. A., Goldin, P. R., Ochsner, K. N., Gabrieli, J. D., Feldman Barrett, L., & Gross, J. J. (2005). Attention and emotion: Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films? NeuroImage, 27(3), 656-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028

Attention and emotion : Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films? / Hutcherson, C. A.; Goldin, Philip R; Ochsner, K. N.; Gabrieli, J. D.; Feldman Barrett, L.; Gross, J. J.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 27, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 656-668.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hutcherson, CA, Goldin, PR, Ochsner, KN, Gabrieli, JD, Feldman Barrett, L & Gross, JJ 2005, 'Attention and emotion: Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?', NeuroImage, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 656-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028
Hutcherson, C. A. ; Goldin, Philip R ; Ochsner, K. N. ; Gabrieli, J. D. ; Feldman Barrett, L. ; Gross, J. J. / Attention and emotion : Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?. In: NeuroImage. 2005 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 656-668.
@article{0ce7fb14940d4f019f7417b43328514d,
title = "Attention and emotion: Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?",
abstract = "Functional neuroimaging of affective systems often includes subjective self-report of the affective response. Although self-report provides valuable information regarding participants' affective responses, prior studies have raised the concern that the attentional demands of reporting on affective experience may obscure neural activations reflecting more natural affective responses. In the present study, we used potent emotion-eliciting amusing and sad films, employed a novel method of continuous self-reported rating of emotion experience, and compared the impact of rating with passive viewing of amusing and sad films. Subjective rating of ongoing emotional responses did not decrease either self-reported experience of emotion or neural activations relative to passive viewing in any brain regions. Rating, relative to passive viewing, produced increased activity in anterior cingulate, insula, and several other areas associated with introspection of emotion. These results support the use of continuous emotion measures and emotionally engaging films to study the dynamics of emotional responding and suggest that there may be some contexts in which the attention to emotion induced by reporting emotion experience does not disrupt emotional responding either behaviorally or neurally.",
keywords = "Attention, Emotion, Neural response",
author = "Hutcherson, {C. A.} and Goldin, {Philip R} and Ochsner, {K. N.} and Gabrieli, {J. D.} and {Feldman Barrett}, L. and Gross, {J. J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "656--668",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention and emotion

T2 - Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?

AU - Hutcherson, C. A.

AU - Goldin, Philip R

AU - Ochsner, K. N.

AU - Gabrieli, J. D.

AU - Feldman Barrett, L.

AU - Gross, J. J.

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Functional neuroimaging of affective systems often includes subjective self-report of the affective response. Although self-report provides valuable information regarding participants' affective responses, prior studies have raised the concern that the attentional demands of reporting on affective experience may obscure neural activations reflecting more natural affective responses. In the present study, we used potent emotion-eliciting amusing and sad films, employed a novel method of continuous self-reported rating of emotion experience, and compared the impact of rating with passive viewing of amusing and sad films. Subjective rating of ongoing emotional responses did not decrease either self-reported experience of emotion or neural activations relative to passive viewing in any brain regions. Rating, relative to passive viewing, produced increased activity in anterior cingulate, insula, and several other areas associated with introspection of emotion. These results support the use of continuous emotion measures and emotionally engaging films to study the dynamics of emotional responding and suggest that there may be some contexts in which the attention to emotion induced by reporting emotion experience does not disrupt emotional responding either behaviorally or neurally.

AB - Functional neuroimaging of affective systems often includes subjective self-report of the affective response. Although self-report provides valuable information regarding participants' affective responses, prior studies have raised the concern that the attentional demands of reporting on affective experience may obscure neural activations reflecting more natural affective responses. In the present study, we used potent emotion-eliciting amusing and sad films, employed a novel method of continuous self-reported rating of emotion experience, and compared the impact of rating with passive viewing of amusing and sad films. Subjective rating of ongoing emotional responses did not decrease either self-reported experience of emotion or neural activations relative to passive viewing in any brain regions. Rating, relative to passive viewing, produced increased activity in anterior cingulate, insula, and several other areas associated with introspection of emotion. These results support the use of continuous emotion measures and emotionally engaging films to study the dynamics of emotional responding and suggest that there may be some contexts in which the attention to emotion induced by reporting emotion experience does not disrupt emotional responding either behaviorally or neurally.

KW - Attention

KW - Emotion

KW - Neural response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23744436571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23744436571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028

M3 - Article

C2 - 15946863

AN - SCOPUS:23744436571

VL - 27

SP - 656

EP - 668

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 3

ER -