Attempted immunization of cats against feline infectious peritonitis, using avirulent live virus or sublethal amounts of virulent virus.

Niels C Pedersen, J. W. Black

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Kittens vaccinated with an avirulent biotype of the Black strain of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV; given oronasally) developed both indirect fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies, but were not protected against oronasal challenge exposure with virulent virus. In fact, kittens vaccinated with avirulent virus were more readily infected than were nonvaccinated cats. A proportion of kittens could be immunized to FIPV by giving sublethal amounts of virulent virus. This technique, however, was too inconsistent and hazardous to have clinical relevance. The results of these studies indicated that humoral immunity was not protective in FIPV infection. There was no correlation between fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies and either disease or immunity. Immune serum from FIPV-resistant cats failed to passively protect susceptible animals against virulent virus given intraperitoneally or oronasally, and as expected, actually sensitized them to infection. It was concluded that cell-mediated immunity was probably responsible for protection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-234
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume44
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1983

Fingerprint

Feline Infectious Peritonitis
feline infectious peritonitis
Feline Coronavirus
Immunization
immunization
Cats
cats
Viruses
viruses
kittens
Neutralizing Antibodies
neutralizing antibodies
Feline coronavirus
Humoral Immunity
Infection
biotypes
humoral immunity
Cellular Immunity
infection
cell-mediated immunity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

@article{aa61a0efdcf5484eb10d6f83b8135b4d,
title = "Attempted immunization of cats against feline infectious peritonitis, using avirulent live virus or sublethal amounts of virulent virus.",
abstract = "Kittens vaccinated with an avirulent biotype of the Black strain of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV; given oronasally) developed both indirect fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies, but were not protected against oronasal challenge exposure with virulent virus. In fact, kittens vaccinated with avirulent virus were more readily infected than were nonvaccinated cats. A proportion of kittens could be immunized to FIPV by giving sublethal amounts of virulent virus. This technique, however, was too inconsistent and hazardous to have clinical relevance. The results of these studies indicated that humoral immunity was not protective in FIPV infection. There was no correlation between fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies and either disease or immunity. Immune serum from FIPV-resistant cats failed to passively protect susceptible animals against virulent virus given intraperitoneally or oronasally, and as expected, actually sensitized them to infection. It was concluded that cell-mediated immunity was probably responsible for protection.",
author = "Pedersen, {Niels C} and Black, {J. W.}",
year = "1983",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "229--234",
journal = "American Journal of Veterinary Research",
issn = "0002-9645",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attempted immunization of cats against feline infectious peritonitis, using avirulent live virus or sublethal amounts of virulent virus.

AU - Pedersen, Niels C

AU - Black, J. W.

PY - 1983/2

Y1 - 1983/2

N2 - Kittens vaccinated with an avirulent biotype of the Black strain of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV; given oronasally) developed both indirect fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies, but were not protected against oronasal challenge exposure with virulent virus. In fact, kittens vaccinated with avirulent virus were more readily infected than were nonvaccinated cats. A proportion of kittens could be immunized to FIPV by giving sublethal amounts of virulent virus. This technique, however, was too inconsistent and hazardous to have clinical relevance. The results of these studies indicated that humoral immunity was not protective in FIPV infection. There was no correlation between fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies and either disease or immunity. Immune serum from FIPV-resistant cats failed to passively protect susceptible animals against virulent virus given intraperitoneally or oronasally, and as expected, actually sensitized them to infection. It was concluded that cell-mediated immunity was probably responsible for protection.

AB - Kittens vaccinated with an avirulent biotype of the Black strain of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV; given oronasally) developed both indirect fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies, but were not protected against oronasal challenge exposure with virulent virus. In fact, kittens vaccinated with avirulent virus were more readily infected than were nonvaccinated cats. A proportion of kittens could be immunized to FIPV by giving sublethal amounts of virulent virus. This technique, however, was too inconsistent and hazardous to have clinical relevance. The results of these studies indicated that humoral immunity was not protective in FIPV infection. There was no correlation between fluorescent and virus-neutralizing antibodies and either disease or immunity. Immune serum from FIPV-resistant cats failed to passively protect susceptible animals against virulent virus given intraperitoneally or oronasally, and as expected, actually sensitized them to infection. It was concluded that cell-mediated immunity was probably responsible for protection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020714809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020714809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 229

EP - 234

JO - American Journal of Veterinary Research

JF - American Journal of Veterinary Research

SN - 0002-9645

IS - 2

ER -