Associations between state-level policy liberalism, cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder from 2004 to 2012

Looking beyond medical cannabis law status

Morgan M. Philbin, Pia M. Mauro, Julian Santaella-Tenorio, Christine M. Mauro, Elizabeth N. Kinnard, Magdalena Cerda, Silvia S. Martins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Medical cannabis laws (MCL) have received increased attention as potential drivers of cannabis use (CU), but little work has explored how the broader policy climate, independent of MCL, may impact CU outcomes. We explored the association between state-level policy liberalism and past-year cannabis use (CU) and cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods: We obtained state-level prevalence of past-year CU and CUD among past year cannabis users for ages 12–17, 18–25, and 26+ from the 2004–2006 and 2010–2012 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. States were categorized as liberal, moderate, or conservative based on state-level policy liberalism rankings in 2005 and 2011. Linear models with random state effects examined the association between policy liberalism and past-year CU and CUD, adjusting for state-level social and economic covariates and medical cannabis laws. Results: In adjusted models, liberal states had higher average past-year CU than conservative states for ages 12–17 (+1.58 percentage points; p = 0.03) and 18–25 (+2.96 percentage points; p = 0.01) but not for 26+ (p = 0.19). CUD prevalence among past year users was significantly lower in liberal compared to conservative states for ages 12–17 (−2.87 percentage points; p = 0.045) and marginally lower for ages 26+ (-2.45 percentage points; p = 0.05). Conclusion: Liberal states had higher past-year CU, but lower CUD prevalence among users, compared to conservative states. Researchers and policy makers should consider how the broader policy environment, independent of MCL, may contribute to CU outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-103
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume65
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Medical Marijuana
Politics
Cannabis

Keywords

  • Cannabis
  • Cannabis/marijuana use disorder
  • Marijuana
  • Medical cannabis laws
  • Medical marijuana laws
  • State-level policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Associations between state-level policy liberalism, cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder from 2004 to 2012 : Looking beyond medical cannabis law status. / Philbin, Morgan M.; Mauro, Pia M.; Santaella-Tenorio, Julian; Mauro, Christine M.; Kinnard, Elizabeth N.; Cerda, Magdalena; Martins, Silvia S.

In: International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 65, 01.03.2019, p. 97-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Philbin, Morgan M. ; Mauro, Pia M. ; Santaella-Tenorio, Julian ; Mauro, Christine M. ; Kinnard, Elizabeth N. ; Cerda, Magdalena ; Martins, Silvia S. / Associations between state-level policy liberalism, cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder from 2004 to 2012 : Looking beyond medical cannabis law status. In: International Journal of Drug Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 65. pp. 97-103.
@article{78f289f3f8ca46cdaca35efd75eb4161,
title = "Associations between state-level policy liberalism, cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder from 2004 to 2012: Looking beyond medical cannabis law status",
abstract = "Background: Medical cannabis laws (MCL) have received increased attention as potential drivers of cannabis use (CU), but little work has explored how the broader policy climate, independent of MCL, may impact CU outcomes. We explored the association between state-level policy liberalism and past-year cannabis use (CU) and cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods: We obtained state-level prevalence of past-year CU and CUD among past year cannabis users for ages 12–17, 18–25, and 26+ from the 2004–2006 and 2010–2012 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. States were categorized as liberal, moderate, or conservative based on state-level policy liberalism rankings in 2005 and 2011. Linear models with random state effects examined the association between policy liberalism and past-year CU and CUD, adjusting for state-level social and economic covariates and medical cannabis laws. Results: In adjusted models, liberal states had higher average past-year CU than conservative states for ages 12–17 (+1.58 percentage points; p = 0.03) and 18–25 (+2.96 percentage points; p = 0.01) but not for 26+ (p = 0.19). CUD prevalence among past year users was significantly lower in liberal compared to conservative states for ages 12–17 (−2.87 percentage points; p = 0.045) and marginally lower for ages 26+ (-2.45 percentage points; p = 0.05). Conclusion: Liberal states had higher past-year CU, but lower CUD prevalence among users, compared to conservative states. Researchers and policy makers should consider how the broader policy environment, independent of MCL, may contribute to CU outcomes.",
keywords = "Cannabis, Cannabis/marijuana use disorder, Marijuana, Medical cannabis laws, Medical marijuana laws, State-level policy",
author = "Philbin, {Morgan M.} and Mauro, {Pia M.} and Julian Santaella-Tenorio and Mauro, {Christine M.} and Kinnard, {Elizabeth N.} and Magdalena Cerda and Martins, {Silvia S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.10.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "97--103",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy",
issn = "0955-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Associations between state-level policy liberalism, cannabis use, and cannabis use disorder from 2004 to 2012

T2 - Looking beyond medical cannabis law status

AU - Philbin, Morgan M.

AU - Mauro, Pia M.

AU - Santaella-Tenorio, Julian

AU - Mauro, Christine M.

AU - Kinnard, Elizabeth N.

AU - Cerda, Magdalena

AU - Martins, Silvia S.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Background: Medical cannabis laws (MCL) have received increased attention as potential drivers of cannabis use (CU), but little work has explored how the broader policy climate, independent of MCL, may impact CU outcomes. We explored the association between state-level policy liberalism and past-year cannabis use (CU) and cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods: We obtained state-level prevalence of past-year CU and CUD among past year cannabis users for ages 12–17, 18–25, and 26+ from the 2004–2006 and 2010–2012 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. States were categorized as liberal, moderate, or conservative based on state-level policy liberalism rankings in 2005 and 2011. Linear models with random state effects examined the association between policy liberalism and past-year CU and CUD, adjusting for state-level social and economic covariates and medical cannabis laws. Results: In adjusted models, liberal states had higher average past-year CU than conservative states for ages 12–17 (+1.58 percentage points; p = 0.03) and 18–25 (+2.96 percentage points; p = 0.01) but not for 26+ (p = 0.19). CUD prevalence among past year users was significantly lower in liberal compared to conservative states for ages 12–17 (−2.87 percentage points; p = 0.045) and marginally lower for ages 26+ (-2.45 percentage points; p = 0.05). Conclusion: Liberal states had higher past-year CU, but lower CUD prevalence among users, compared to conservative states. Researchers and policy makers should consider how the broader policy environment, independent of MCL, may contribute to CU outcomes.

AB - Background: Medical cannabis laws (MCL) have received increased attention as potential drivers of cannabis use (CU), but little work has explored how the broader policy climate, independent of MCL, may impact CU outcomes. We explored the association between state-level policy liberalism and past-year cannabis use (CU) and cannabis use disorder (CUD). Methods: We obtained state-level prevalence of past-year CU and CUD among past year cannabis users for ages 12–17, 18–25, and 26+ from the 2004–2006 and 2010–2012 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. States were categorized as liberal, moderate, or conservative based on state-level policy liberalism rankings in 2005 and 2011. Linear models with random state effects examined the association between policy liberalism and past-year CU and CUD, adjusting for state-level social and economic covariates and medical cannabis laws. Results: In adjusted models, liberal states had higher average past-year CU than conservative states for ages 12–17 (+1.58 percentage points; p = 0.03) and 18–25 (+2.96 percentage points; p = 0.01) but not for 26+ (p = 0.19). CUD prevalence among past year users was significantly lower in liberal compared to conservative states for ages 12–17 (−2.87 percentage points; p = 0.045) and marginally lower for ages 26+ (-2.45 percentage points; p = 0.05). Conclusion: Liberal states had higher past-year CU, but lower CUD prevalence among users, compared to conservative states. Researchers and policy makers should consider how the broader policy environment, independent of MCL, may contribute to CU outcomes.

KW - Cannabis

KW - Cannabis/marijuana use disorder

KW - Marijuana

KW - Medical cannabis laws

KW - Medical marijuana laws

KW - State-level policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062807931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062807931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 97

EP - 103

JO - International Journal of Drug Policy

JF - International Journal of Drug Policy

SN - 0955-3959

ER -