Association of velopharyngeal insufficiency with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after speech surgery

Aditi Bhuskute, Jonathan R. Skirko, Christina Roth, Ahmed Bayoumi, Blythe Durbin-Johnson, Travis Tate Tollefson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients with cleft palate and other causes of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) suffer adverse effects on social interactions and communication. Measurement of these patient-reported outcomes is needed to help guide surgical and nonsurgical care. OBJECTIVES: To further validate the VPI Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, measure the change in quality of life (QOL) after speech surgery, and test the association of change in speech with change in QOL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective descriptive cohort including children and young adults undergoing speech surgery for VPI in a tertiary academic center. Participants completed the validated VELO instrument before and after surgical treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative VELO scores and the perceptual speech assessment of speech intelligibility. The VELO scores are divided into subscale domains. Changes in VELO after surgery were analyzed using linear regression models. VELO scores were analyzed as a function of speech intelligibility adjusting for age and cleft type. The correlation between speech intelligibility rating and VELO scores was estimated using the polyserial correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (13 males and 16 females) were included. Mean (SD) age was 7.9 (4.1) years (range, 4-20 years). Pharyngeal flap was used in 14 (48%) cases, Furlow palatoplasty in 12 (41%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty in 1 (3%). The mean (SD) preoperative speech intelligibility rating was 1.71 (1.08), which decreased postoperatively to 0.79 (0.93) in 24 patients who completed protocol (P < .01). The VELO scores improved after surgery (P<.001) as did most subscale scores. Caregiver impact did not change after surgery (P = .36). Speech Intelligibility was correlated with preoperative and postoperative total VELO score (P < .01) and to preoperative subscale domains (situational difficulty [VELO-SiD, P = .005] and perception by others [VELO-PO, P = .05]) and postoperative subscale domains (VELO-SiD [P = .03], VELO-PO [P = .003]). Neither the VELO total nor subscale score change after surgery was correlated with change in speech intelligibility. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Speech surgery improves VPI-specific quality of life. We confirmed validation in a population of untreated patients with VPI and included pharyngeal flap surgery, which had not previously been included in validation studies. The VELO instrument provides patient-specific outcomes, which allows a broader understanding of the social, emotional, and physical effects of VPI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)406-412
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA Facial Plastic Surgery
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Quality of Life
Speech Intelligibility
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Linear Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Validation Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Association of velopharyngeal insufficiency with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after speech surgery. / Bhuskute, Aditi; Skirko, Jonathan R.; Roth, Christina; Bayoumi, Ahmed; Durbin-Johnson, Blythe; Tollefson, Travis Tate.

In: JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 406-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bhuskute, Aditi ; Skirko, Jonathan R. ; Roth, Christina ; Bayoumi, Ahmed ; Durbin-Johnson, Blythe ; Tollefson, Travis Tate. / Association of velopharyngeal insufficiency with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after speech surgery. In: JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 406-412.
@article{2d69d4d78f9048d387909f1d68ef730b,
title = "Association of velopharyngeal insufficiency with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after speech surgery",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE: Patients with cleft palate and other causes of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) suffer adverse effects on social interactions and communication. Measurement of these patient-reported outcomes is needed to help guide surgical and nonsurgical care. OBJECTIVES: To further validate the VPI Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, measure the change in quality of life (QOL) after speech surgery, and test the association of change in speech with change in QOL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective descriptive cohort including children and young adults undergoing speech surgery for VPI in a tertiary academic center. Participants completed the validated VELO instrument before and after surgical treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative VELO scores and the perceptual speech assessment of speech intelligibility. The VELO scores are divided into subscale domains. Changes in VELO after surgery were analyzed using linear regression models. VELO scores were analyzed as a function of speech intelligibility adjusting for age and cleft type. The correlation between speech intelligibility rating and VELO scores was estimated using the polyserial correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (13 males and 16 females) were included. Mean (SD) age was 7.9 (4.1) years (range, 4-20 years). Pharyngeal flap was used in 14 (48{\%}) cases, Furlow palatoplasty in 12 (41{\%}), and sphincter pharyngoplasty in 1 (3{\%}). The mean (SD) preoperative speech intelligibility rating was 1.71 (1.08), which decreased postoperatively to 0.79 (0.93) in 24 patients who completed protocol (P < .01). The VELO scores improved after surgery (P<.001) as did most subscale scores. Caregiver impact did not change after surgery (P = .36). Speech Intelligibility was correlated with preoperative and postoperative total VELO score (P < .01) and to preoperative subscale domains (situational difficulty [VELO-SiD, P = .005] and perception by others [VELO-PO, P = .05]) and postoperative subscale domains (VELO-SiD [P = .03], VELO-PO [P = .003]). Neither the VELO total nor subscale score change after surgery was correlated with change in speech intelligibility. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Speech surgery improves VPI-specific quality of life. We confirmed validation in a population of untreated patients with VPI and included pharyngeal flap surgery, which had not previously been included in validation studies. The VELO instrument provides patient-specific outcomes, which allows a broader understanding of the social, emotional, and physical effects of VPI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.",
author = "Aditi Bhuskute and Skirko, {Jonathan R.} and Christina Roth and Ahmed Bayoumi and Blythe Durbin-Johnson and Tollefson, {Travis Tate}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0639",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "406--412",
journal = "JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2168-6076",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of velopharyngeal insufficiency with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after speech surgery

AU - Bhuskute, Aditi

AU - Skirko, Jonathan R.

AU - Roth, Christina

AU - Bayoumi, Ahmed

AU - Durbin-Johnson, Blythe

AU - Tollefson, Travis Tate

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE: Patients with cleft palate and other causes of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) suffer adverse effects on social interactions and communication. Measurement of these patient-reported outcomes is needed to help guide surgical and nonsurgical care. OBJECTIVES: To further validate the VPI Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, measure the change in quality of life (QOL) after speech surgery, and test the association of change in speech with change in QOL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective descriptive cohort including children and young adults undergoing speech surgery for VPI in a tertiary academic center. Participants completed the validated VELO instrument before and after surgical treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative VELO scores and the perceptual speech assessment of speech intelligibility. The VELO scores are divided into subscale domains. Changes in VELO after surgery were analyzed using linear regression models. VELO scores were analyzed as a function of speech intelligibility adjusting for age and cleft type. The correlation between speech intelligibility rating and VELO scores was estimated using the polyserial correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (13 males and 16 females) were included. Mean (SD) age was 7.9 (4.1) years (range, 4-20 years). Pharyngeal flap was used in 14 (48%) cases, Furlow palatoplasty in 12 (41%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty in 1 (3%). The mean (SD) preoperative speech intelligibility rating was 1.71 (1.08), which decreased postoperatively to 0.79 (0.93) in 24 patients who completed protocol (P < .01). The VELO scores improved after surgery (P<.001) as did most subscale scores. Caregiver impact did not change after surgery (P = .36). Speech Intelligibility was correlated with preoperative and postoperative total VELO score (P < .01) and to preoperative subscale domains (situational difficulty [VELO-SiD, P = .005] and perception by others [VELO-PO, P = .05]) and postoperative subscale domains (VELO-SiD [P = .03], VELO-PO [P = .003]). Neither the VELO total nor subscale score change after surgery was correlated with change in speech intelligibility. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Speech surgery improves VPI-specific quality of life. We confirmed validation in a population of untreated patients with VPI and included pharyngeal flap surgery, which had not previously been included in validation studies. The VELO instrument provides patient-specific outcomes, which allows a broader understanding of the social, emotional, and physical effects of VPI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

AB - IMPORTANCE: Patients with cleft palate and other causes of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) suffer adverse effects on social interactions and communication. Measurement of these patient-reported outcomes is needed to help guide surgical and nonsurgical care. OBJECTIVES: To further validate the VPI Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, measure the change in quality of life (QOL) after speech surgery, and test the association of change in speech with change in QOL. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective descriptive cohort including children and young adults undergoing speech surgery for VPI in a tertiary academic center. Participants completed the validated VELO instrument before and after surgical treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative VELO scores and the perceptual speech assessment of speech intelligibility. The VELO scores are divided into subscale domains. Changes in VELO after surgery were analyzed using linear regression models. VELO scores were analyzed as a function of speech intelligibility adjusting for age and cleft type. The correlation between speech intelligibility rating and VELO scores was estimated using the polyserial correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (13 males and 16 females) were included. Mean (SD) age was 7.9 (4.1) years (range, 4-20 years). Pharyngeal flap was used in 14 (48%) cases, Furlow palatoplasty in 12 (41%), and sphincter pharyngoplasty in 1 (3%). The mean (SD) preoperative speech intelligibility rating was 1.71 (1.08), which decreased postoperatively to 0.79 (0.93) in 24 patients who completed protocol (P < .01). The VELO scores improved after surgery (P<.001) as did most subscale scores. Caregiver impact did not change after surgery (P = .36). Speech Intelligibility was correlated with preoperative and postoperative total VELO score (P < .01) and to preoperative subscale domains (situational difficulty [VELO-SiD, P = .005] and perception by others [VELO-PO, P = .05]) and postoperative subscale domains (VELO-SiD [P = .03], VELO-PO [P = .003]). Neither the VELO total nor subscale score change after surgery was correlated with change in speech intelligibility. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Speech surgery improves VPI-specific quality of life. We confirmed validation in a population of untreated patients with VPI and included pharyngeal flap surgery, which had not previously been included in validation studies. The VELO instrument provides patient-specific outcomes, which allows a broader understanding of the social, emotional, and physical effects of VPI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029806749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029806749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0639

DO - 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0639

M3 - Article

C2 - 28727858

AN - SCOPUS:85029806749

VL - 19

SP - 406

EP - 412

JO - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

JF - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

SN - 2168-6076

IS - 5

ER -