Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations

Richard S. Matulewicz, David D. Odell, Jeanette W. Chung, Kristen A. Ban, Anthony D. Yang, Karl Y. Bilimoria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Residents are often required to balance whether to adhere to duty hour policies or violate them to care for patients and obtain educational experiences. Little is known about why residents violate duty hour policies and whether there is a relationship between how often residents violate duty hours and concerns about patient safety. Our objective was to assess the association between resident duty hour violations and resident concerns about patient safety. Study Design We analyzed survey data collected from surgery residents who completed the 2015 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, excluding those in the Flexible Policy arm of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial. Perceptions of how duty hour restrictions affect patient safety were dichotomized as either “positive/neutral” or “negative.” Resident duty hour violations in a typical month were separated as “frequently” (≥3 times) or “infrequently” (<3 times). Rates were compared and regression models were used to examine the association between negative perceptions and duty hour violations, adjusting for resident and program-level covariates. Results Overall, 25.3% of trainees under current policies perceived that current ACGME duty hour policies negatively affected patient safety. This negative perception increased with PGY level (PGY1: 18.5%, PGY2 to 3: 22.6%, PGY4 to 5: 32.0%; p < 0.001). Residents with negative perceptions more often reported frequent duty violations (positive/neutral: 20.0% vs negative: 32.7%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, a negative perception of how duty hour policies affect patient safety was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of frequent duty hour violations among all trainees grouped together (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.60–2.22), and separately for interns (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.70–3.93), junior (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.22–2.16), and senior residents (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.54–2.58). Conclusions Trainees who reported perceiving negative effects of duty hour policies on patient safety were more likely to report frequent duty hour violations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-117
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume224
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Odds Ratio
Patient Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Matulewicz, R. S., Odell, D. D., Chung, J. W., Ban, K. A., Yang, A. D., & Bilimoria, K. Y. (2017). Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 224(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.044

Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations. / Matulewicz, Richard S.; Odell, David D.; Chung, Jeanette W.; Ban, Kristen A.; Yang, Anthony D.; Bilimoria, Karl Y.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 224, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 113-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matulewicz, Richard S. ; Odell, David D. ; Chung, Jeanette W. ; Ban, Kristen A. ; Yang, Anthony D. ; Bilimoria, Karl Y. / Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2017 ; Vol. 224, No. 2. pp. 113-117.
@article{b3e304fa1569436c847238753115f4bb,
title = "Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations",
abstract = "Background Residents are often required to balance whether to adhere to duty hour policies or violate them to care for patients and obtain educational experiences. Little is known about why residents violate duty hour policies and whether there is a relationship between how often residents violate duty hours and concerns about patient safety. Our objective was to assess the association between resident duty hour violations and resident concerns about patient safety. Study Design We analyzed survey data collected from surgery residents who completed the 2015 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, excluding those in the Flexible Policy arm of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial. Perceptions of how duty hour restrictions affect patient safety were dichotomized as either “positive/neutral” or “negative.” Resident duty hour violations in a typical month were separated as “frequently” (≥3 times) or “infrequently” (<3 times). Rates were compared and regression models were used to examine the association between negative perceptions and duty hour violations, adjusting for resident and program-level covariates. Results Overall, 25.3{\%} of trainees under current policies perceived that current ACGME duty hour policies negatively affected patient safety. This negative perception increased with PGY level (PGY1: 18.5{\%}, PGY2 to 3: 22.6{\%}, PGY4 to 5: 32.0{\%}; p < 0.001). Residents with negative perceptions more often reported frequent duty violations (positive/neutral: 20.0{\%} vs negative: 32.7{\%}; p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, a negative perception of how duty hour policies affect patient safety was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of frequent duty hour violations among all trainees grouped together (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95{\%} CI, 1.60–2.22), and separately for interns (OR = 2.59; 95{\%} CI, 1.70–3.93), junior (OR = 1.62; 95{\%} CI 1.22–2.16), and senior residents (OR = 1.99; 95{\%} CI, 1.54–2.58). Conclusions Trainees who reported perceiving negative effects of duty hour policies on patient safety were more likely to report frequent duty hour violations.",
author = "Matulewicz, {Richard S.} and Odell, {David D.} and Chung, {Jeanette W.} and Ban, {Kristen A.} and Yang, {Anthony D.} and Bilimoria, {Karl Y.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "224",
pages = "113--117",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association Between Resident Perceptions of Patient Safety and Duty Hour Violations

AU - Matulewicz, Richard S.

AU - Odell, David D.

AU - Chung, Jeanette W.

AU - Ban, Kristen A.

AU - Yang, Anthony D.

AU - Bilimoria, Karl Y.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Background Residents are often required to balance whether to adhere to duty hour policies or violate them to care for patients and obtain educational experiences. Little is known about why residents violate duty hour policies and whether there is a relationship between how often residents violate duty hours and concerns about patient safety. Our objective was to assess the association between resident duty hour violations and resident concerns about patient safety. Study Design We analyzed survey data collected from surgery residents who completed the 2015 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, excluding those in the Flexible Policy arm of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial. Perceptions of how duty hour restrictions affect patient safety were dichotomized as either “positive/neutral” or “negative.” Resident duty hour violations in a typical month were separated as “frequently” (≥3 times) or “infrequently” (<3 times). Rates were compared and regression models were used to examine the association between negative perceptions and duty hour violations, adjusting for resident and program-level covariates. Results Overall, 25.3% of trainees under current policies perceived that current ACGME duty hour policies negatively affected patient safety. This negative perception increased with PGY level (PGY1: 18.5%, PGY2 to 3: 22.6%, PGY4 to 5: 32.0%; p < 0.001). Residents with negative perceptions more often reported frequent duty violations (positive/neutral: 20.0% vs negative: 32.7%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, a negative perception of how duty hour policies affect patient safety was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of frequent duty hour violations among all trainees grouped together (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.60–2.22), and separately for interns (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.70–3.93), junior (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.22–2.16), and senior residents (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.54–2.58). Conclusions Trainees who reported perceiving negative effects of duty hour policies on patient safety were more likely to report frequent duty hour violations.

AB - Background Residents are often required to balance whether to adhere to duty hour policies or violate them to care for patients and obtain educational experiences. Little is known about why residents violate duty hour policies and whether there is a relationship between how often residents violate duty hours and concerns about patient safety. Our objective was to assess the association between resident duty hour violations and resident concerns about patient safety. Study Design We analyzed survey data collected from surgery residents who completed the 2015 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination, excluding those in the Flexible Policy arm of the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) trial. Perceptions of how duty hour restrictions affect patient safety were dichotomized as either “positive/neutral” or “negative.” Resident duty hour violations in a typical month were separated as “frequently” (≥3 times) or “infrequently” (<3 times). Rates were compared and regression models were used to examine the association between negative perceptions and duty hour violations, adjusting for resident and program-level covariates. Results Overall, 25.3% of trainees under current policies perceived that current ACGME duty hour policies negatively affected patient safety. This negative perception increased with PGY level (PGY1: 18.5%, PGY2 to 3: 22.6%, PGY4 to 5: 32.0%; p < 0.001). Residents with negative perceptions more often reported frequent duty violations (positive/neutral: 20.0% vs negative: 32.7%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, a negative perception of how duty hour policies affect patient safety was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of frequent duty hour violations among all trainees grouped together (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.60–2.22), and separately for interns (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.70–3.93), junior (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.22–2.16), and senior residents (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.54–2.58). Conclusions Trainees who reported perceiving negative effects of duty hour policies on patient safety were more likely to report frequent duty hour violations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010441730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010441730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.044

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010441730

VL - 224

SP - 113

EP - 117

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 2

ER -