Assessment of the short-term systemic effect of and acute phase response to mulesing and other options for controlling breech flystrike in Merino lambs

M. L. Lepherd, P. J. Canfield, Geraldine B Hunt, P. C. Thomson, K. L. Bosward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Mulesing is an important method of preventing flystrike of Merino sheep in Australia, but because there are important short-term welfare issues associated with mulesing, alternative methods of removing the skin folds for breech flystrike prevention are being investigated. Objective To examine the short-term systemic effects of mulesing and two proposed alternatives, compared with two control methods, for controlling breech flystrike. Method The five treatment groups comprised 10 lambs each: (1) mulesing, (2) intradermal-cetrimide treatment, (3) clip application, (4) tail docking only and (5) no treatment. Changes in body weight, haematological and biochemical profiles, and concentrations of fibrinogen, haptoglobin and serum amyloid A were measured repeatedly for 29 days post treatment. Results The mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups were the only treatment groups to lose weight during the first week, with greater weight loss in the mulesing group. The mulesing group had the most marked increases in all three acute-phase protein concentrations, closely followed by the intradermal-cetrimide group, with a mild increase observed for the clip group and even less for the tail-docked group. The mulesing group was the only group to develop mild anaemia, transient hyperglycaemia and a persistent decreased albumin:globulin ratio. The neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio was above the upper reference limit for both the mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups. Conclusion Mulesing had the greatest systemic effect in terms of the magnitude and duration of increased acute-phase protein concentrations and haematological, biochemical and body weight changes. The clips had a significantly reduced systemic effect compared with mulesing, with the intradermal-cetrimide treatment in between the two. Tail docking had a minimal systemic effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-26
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian Veterinary Journal
Volume89
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

mulesing
flystrike
Acute-Phase Reaction
Merino
lambs
Surgical Instruments
Body Weight Changes
Acute-Phase Proteins
Tail
Serum Amyloid A Protein
tail docking
Haptoglobins
Globulins
acute phase proteins
body weight changes
Hyperglycemia
Fibrinogen
Anemia
Weight Loss
Albumins

Keywords

  • Acute phase response
  • Breech flystrike
  • Clinical pathology
  • Mulesing
  • Non-surgical mulesing
  • Sheep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Assessment of the short-term systemic effect of and acute phase response to mulesing and other options for controlling breech flystrike in Merino lambs. / Lepherd, M. L.; Canfield, P. J.; Hunt, Geraldine B; Thomson, P. C.; Bosward, K. L.

In: Australian Veterinary Journal, Vol. 89, No. 1-2, 01.2011, p. 19-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ec739fe14c54a7c9c4fc0ee0a74542d,
title = "Assessment of the short-term systemic effect of and acute phase response to mulesing and other options for controlling breech flystrike in Merino lambs",
abstract = "Background Mulesing is an important method of preventing flystrike of Merino sheep in Australia, but because there are important short-term welfare issues associated with mulesing, alternative methods of removing the skin folds for breech flystrike prevention are being investigated. Objective To examine the short-term systemic effects of mulesing and two proposed alternatives, compared with two control methods, for controlling breech flystrike. Method The five treatment groups comprised 10 lambs each: (1) mulesing, (2) intradermal-cetrimide treatment, (3) clip application, (4) tail docking only and (5) no treatment. Changes in body weight, haematological and biochemical profiles, and concentrations of fibrinogen, haptoglobin and serum amyloid A were measured repeatedly for 29 days post treatment. Results The mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups were the only treatment groups to lose weight during the first week, with greater weight loss in the mulesing group. The mulesing group had the most marked increases in all three acute-phase protein concentrations, closely followed by the intradermal-cetrimide group, with a mild increase observed for the clip group and even less for the tail-docked group. The mulesing group was the only group to develop mild anaemia, transient hyperglycaemia and a persistent decreased albumin:globulin ratio. The neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio was above the upper reference limit for both the mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups. Conclusion Mulesing had the greatest systemic effect in terms of the magnitude and duration of increased acute-phase protein concentrations and haematological, biochemical and body weight changes. The clips had a significantly reduced systemic effect compared with mulesing, with the intradermal-cetrimide treatment in between the two. Tail docking had a minimal systemic effect.",
keywords = "Acute phase response, Breech flystrike, Clinical pathology, Mulesing, Non-surgical mulesing, Sheep",
author = "Lepherd, {M. L.} and Canfield, {P. J.} and Hunt, {Geraldine B} and Thomson, {P. C.} and Bosward, {K. L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00668.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "19--26",
journal = "Australian Veterinary Journal",
issn = "0005-0423",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of the short-term systemic effect of and acute phase response to mulesing and other options for controlling breech flystrike in Merino lambs

AU - Lepherd, M. L.

AU - Canfield, P. J.

AU - Hunt, Geraldine B

AU - Thomson, P. C.

AU - Bosward, K. L.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background Mulesing is an important method of preventing flystrike of Merino sheep in Australia, but because there are important short-term welfare issues associated with mulesing, alternative methods of removing the skin folds for breech flystrike prevention are being investigated. Objective To examine the short-term systemic effects of mulesing and two proposed alternatives, compared with two control methods, for controlling breech flystrike. Method The five treatment groups comprised 10 lambs each: (1) mulesing, (2) intradermal-cetrimide treatment, (3) clip application, (4) tail docking only and (5) no treatment. Changes in body weight, haematological and biochemical profiles, and concentrations of fibrinogen, haptoglobin and serum amyloid A were measured repeatedly for 29 days post treatment. Results The mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups were the only treatment groups to lose weight during the first week, with greater weight loss in the mulesing group. The mulesing group had the most marked increases in all three acute-phase protein concentrations, closely followed by the intradermal-cetrimide group, with a mild increase observed for the clip group and even less for the tail-docked group. The mulesing group was the only group to develop mild anaemia, transient hyperglycaemia and a persistent decreased albumin:globulin ratio. The neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio was above the upper reference limit for both the mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups. Conclusion Mulesing had the greatest systemic effect in terms of the magnitude and duration of increased acute-phase protein concentrations and haematological, biochemical and body weight changes. The clips had a significantly reduced systemic effect compared with mulesing, with the intradermal-cetrimide treatment in between the two. Tail docking had a minimal systemic effect.

AB - Background Mulesing is an important method of preventing flystrike of Merino sheep in Australia, but because there are important short-term welfare issues associated with mulesing, alternative methods of removing the skin folds for breech flystrike prevention are being investigated. Objective To examine the short-term systemic effects of mulesing and two proposed alternatives, compared with two control methods, for controlling breech flystrike. Method The five treatment groups comprised 10 lambs each: (1) mulesing, (2) intradermal-cetrimide treatment, (3) clip application, (4) tail docking only and (5) no treatment. Changes in body weight, haematological and biochemical profiles, and concentrations of fibrinogen, haptoglobin and serum amyloid A were measured repeatedly for 29 days post treatment. Results The mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups were the only treatment groups to lose weight during the first week, with greater weight loss in the mulesing group. The mulesing group had the most marked increases in all three acute-phase protein concentrations, closely followed by the intradermal-cetrimide group, with a mild increase observed for the clip group and even less for the tail-docked group. The mulesing group was the only group to develop mild anaemia, transient hyperglycaemia and a persistent decreased albumin:globulin ratio. The neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio was above the upper reference limit for both the mulesing and intradermal-cetrimide groups. Conclusion Mulesing had the greatest systemic effect in terms of the magnitude and duration of increased acute-phase protein concentrations and haematological, biochemical and body weight changes. The clips had a significantly reduced systemic effect compared with mulesing, with the intradermal-cetrimide treatment in between the two. Tail docking had a minimal systemic effect.

KW - Acute phase response

KW - Breech flystrike

KW - Clinical pathology

KW - Mulesing

KW - Non-surgical mulesing

KW - Sheep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751482496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751482496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00668.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00668.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21250952

AN - SCOPUS:78751482496

VL - 89

SP - 19

EP - 26

JO - Australian Veterinary Journal

JF - Australian Veterinary Journal

SN - 0005-0423

IS - 1-2

ER -