Assessment of 3 Bowel Preparation Protocols for Computed Tomography Pneumocolonography in Normal Dogs

Michele A Steffey, Allison Zwingenberger, Leticia Daniel, Sandra L. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of 3 different bowel preparation protocols on interpretation of computed tomography (CT) pneumocolonography images. Study Design: Experimental crossover design. Animals: Intact male, hound-cross, research colony dogs (n=4). Methods: All dogs received the 3 different bowel preparation protocols for CT pneumocolonography in the same order, with a minimum of 2 weeks between protocols. For each segment of large bowel, the subjective adequacy of bowel cleansing was assessed, residual fecal and bowel volumes were calculated, and the density of fecal material in the bowel lumen was measured. Linear mixed effect models that included a random dog effect were used to evaluate mean differences in outcome measures across protocols. Results: No dogs experienced any clinical problems associated with the protocols or CT pneumocolonography. Bowel cleansing was considered adequate for CT pneumocolonography interpretation for all 3 protocols. There was a significant effect of protocol on residual fecal volumes and the fecal:bowel volume ratio, with the 2 protocols that included an extended fast producing the lowest total residual fecal volumes. There was a significant effect of protocol on maximum measured density of residual fecal material with the 2 protocols including iodinated contrast having the highest density. Conclusions: All protocols were sufficient for CT pneumocolonography interpretation and contrast-tagging of residual fecal material was successful with oral iopamidol administration. An at-home bowel cleansing protocol may provide adequate bowel cleansing for CT pneumocolonography image interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-935
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary Surgery
Volume45
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

computed tomography
Tomography
Dogs
dogs
Residual Volume
image interpretation
Iopamidol
hounds
Cross-Over Studies
oral administration
Oral Administration
Research Design
experimental design
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Assessment of 3 Bowel Preparation Protocols for Computed Tomography Pneumocolonography in Normal Dogs. / Steffey, Michele A; Zwingenberger, Allison; Daniel, Leticia; Taylor, Sandra L.

In: Veterinary Surgery, Vol. 45, No. 7, 01.10.2016, p. 929-935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{936964247e2144a3a999e1b0ab5a0da3,
title = "Assessment of 3 Bowel Preparation Protocols for Computed Tomography Pneumocolonography in Normal Dogs",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the effects of 3 different bowel preparation protocols on interpretation of computed tomography (CT) pneumocolonography images. Study Design: Experimental crossover design. Animals: Intact male, hound-cross, research colony dogs (n=4). Methods: All dogs received the 3 different bowel preparation protocols for CT pneumocolonography in the same order, with a minimum of 2 weeks between protocols. For each segment of large bowel, the subjective adequacy of bowel cleansing was assessed, residual fecal and bowel volumes were calculated, and the density of fecal material in the bowel lumen was measured. Linear mixed effect models that included a random dog effect were used to evaluate mean differences in outcome measures across protocols. Results: No dogs experienced any clinical problems associated with the protocols or CT pneumocolonography. Bowel cleansing was considered adequate for CT pneumocolonography interpretation for all 3 protocols. There was a significant effect of protocol on residual fecal volumes and the fecal:bowel volume ratio, with the 2 protocols that included an extended fast producing the lowest total residual fecal volumes. There was a significant effect of protocol on maximum measured density of residual fecal material with the 2 protocols including iodinated contrast having the highest density. Conclusions: All protocols were sufficient for CT pneumocolonography interpretation and contrast-tagging of residual fecal material was successful with oral iopamidol administration. An at-home bowel cleansing protocol may provide adequate bowel cleansing for CT pneumocolonography image interpretation.",
author = "Steffey, {Michele A} and Allison Zwingenberger and Leticia Daniel and Taylor, {Sandra L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/vsu.12524",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "929--935",
journal = "Veterinary Surgery",
issn = "0161-3499",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of 3 Bowel Preparation Protocols for Computed Tomography Pneumocolonography in Normal Dogs

AU - Steffey, Michele A

AU - Zwingenberger, Allison

AU - Daniel, Leticia

AU - Taylor, Sandra L.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the effects of 3 different bowel preparation protocols on interpretation of computed tomography (CT) pneumocolonography images. Study Design: Experimental crossover design. Animals: Intact male, hound-cross, research colony dogs (n=4). Methods: All dogs received the 3 different bowel preparation protocols for CT pneumocolonography in the same order, with a minimum of 2 weeks between protocols. For each segment of large bowel, the subjective adequacy of bowel cleansing was assessed, residual fecal and bowel volumes were calculated, and the density of fecal material in the bowel lumen was measured. Linear mixed effect models that included a random dog effect were used to evaluate mean differences in outcome measures across protocols. Results: No dogs experienced any clinical problems associated with the protocols or CT pneumocolonography. Bowel cleansing was considered adequate for CT pneumocolonography interpretation for all 3 protocols. There was a significant effect of protocol on residual fecal volumes and the fecal:bowel volume ratio, with the 2 protocols that included an extended fast producing the lowest total residual fecal volumes. There was a significant effect of protocol on maximum measured density of residual fecal material with the 2 protocols including iodinated contrast having the highest density. Conclusions: All protocols were sufficient for CT pneumocolonography interpretation and contrast-tagging of residual fecal material was successful with oral iopamidol administration. An at-home bowel cleansing protocol may provide adequate bowel cleansing for CT pneumocolonography image interpretation.

AB - Objective: To investigate the effects of 3 different bowel preparation protocols on interpretation of computed tomography (CT) pneumocolonography images. Study Design: Experimental crossover design. Animals: Intact male, hound-cross, research colony dogs (n=4). Methods: All dogs received the 3 different bowel preparation protocols for CT pneumocolonography in the same order, with a minimum of 2 weeks between protocols. For each segment of large bowel, the subjective adequacy of bowel cleansing was assessed, residual fecal and bowel volumes were calculated, and the density of fecal material in the bowel lumen was measured. Linear mixed effect models that included a random dog effect were used to evaluate mean differences in outcome measures across protocols. Results: No dogs experienced any clinical problems associated with the protocols or CT pneumocolonography. Bowel cleansing was considered adequate for CT pneumocolonography interpretation for all 3 protocols. There was a significant effect of protocol on residual fecal volumes and the fecal:bowel volume ratio, with the 2 protocols that included an extended fast producing the lowest total residual fecal volumes. There was a significant effect of protocol on maximum measured density of residual fecal material with the 2 protocols including iodinated contrast having the highest density. Conclusions: All protocols were sufficient for CT pneumocolonography interpretation and contrast-tagging of residual fecal material was successful with oral iopamidol administration. An at-home bowel cleansing protocol may provide adequate bowel cleansing for CT pneumocolonography image interpretation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991107178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991107178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/vsu.12524

DO - 10.1111/vsu.12524

M3 - Article

C2 - 27489142

AN - SCOPUS:84991107178

VL - 45

SP - 929

EP - 935

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

SN - 0161-3499

IS - 7

ER -