Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank

Jenna Van Draanen, Pamela Davidson, Helene Bour-Jordan, Lee Anna Bowman-Carpio, David Boyle, Steve Dubinett, Brian Gardner, Jachael Gardner, Courtney McFall, Dan Mercola, Terry Nakazono, Stephanie Soares, Hubert Stoppler, Margaret Tempero, Scott Vandenberg, Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan, Sarah Dry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Biosamples and associated clinical data accelerate translational and clinical research discoveries. A lack of high quality biosamples both stalls projects and limits research advances. In this study, we targeted a wide audience of University of California (UC) biobanking stakeholders who were either involved with the collection or the utilization of biosamples to assess the scope of their biobanking activities and their interest in virtual biobanking or cooperating in the formation of the UC-wide biorepository. Materials and Methods: Each institutional review board from the five UC medical campuses' provided a dataset of potential researchers involved with biobanking. Once identified, a brief six item web-based questionnaire was administered electronically to these researchers. Results: Most survey participants (80%) responded "yes" (n = 348) that they were actively collecting biosamples for research, and 68% of participants indicated they would either definitely (30%, n = 131) or maybe (38%, n = 166) request biosample materials now or within the next year. An equal proportion of participants responded yes (42% or n = 184) and maybe (42% or n = 182) when asked if they would voluntarily contribute specimens to a UC-wide virtual biobank. Discussion: The results presented above show high levels of support among UC biobanking stakeholders for both requesting material from and contributing material to a UC-wide virtual biobank. In addition, a considerable number of individual researchers on our five UC medical campuses are conducting biospecimen research (i.e., well over n = 435 respondents).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-210
Number of pages8
JournalBiopreservation and Biobanking
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Research
Translational Medical Research
Research Ethics Committees
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Biobank
  • biosamples
  • perceptions
  • stakeholder
  • virtual

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Van Draanen, J., Davidson, P., Bour-Jordan, H., Bowman-Carpio, L. A., Boyle, D., Dubinett, S., ... Dry, S. (2017). Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 15(3), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2016.0009

Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank. / Van Draanen, Jenna; Davidson, Pamela; Bour-Jordan, Helene; Bowman-Carpio, Lee Anna; Boyle, David; Dubinett, Steve; Gardner, Brian; Gardner, Jachael; McFall, Courtney; Mercola, Dan; Nakazono, Terry; Soares, Stephanie; Stoppler, Hubert; Tempero, Margaret; Vandenberg, Scott; Wan, Yu-Jui Yvonne; Dry, Sarah.

In: Biopreservation and Biobanking, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 203-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Draanen, J, Davidson, P, Bour-Jordan, H, Bowman-Carpio, LA, Boyle, D, Dubinett, S, Gardner, B, Gardner, J, McFall, C, Mercola, D, Nakazono, T, Soares, S, Stoppler, H, Tempero, M, Vandenberg, S, Wan, Y-JY & Dry, S 2017, 'Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank', Biopreservation and Biobanking, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2016.0009
Van Draanen J, Davidson P, Bour-Jordan H, Bowman-Carpio LA, Boyle D, Dubinett S et al. Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2017 Jun 1;15(3):203-210. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2016.0009
Van Draanen, Jenna ; Davidson, Pamela ; Bour-Jordan, Helene ; Bowman-Carpio, Lee Anna ; Boyle, David ; Dubinett, Steve ; Gardner, Brian ; Gardner, Jachael ; McFall, Courtney ; Mercola, Dan ; Nakazono, Terry ; Soares, Stephanie ; Stoppler, Hubert ; Tempero, Margaret ; Vandenberg, Scott ; Wan, Yu-Jui Yvonne ; Dry, Sarah. / Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank. In: Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 203-210.
@article{2b7efd4cd35440868619aa3d1bc9fc5e,
title = "Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank",
abstract = "Introduction: Biosamples and associated clinical data accelerate translational and clinical research discoveries. A lack of high quality biosamples both stalls projects and limits research advances. In this study, we targeted a wide audience of University of California (UC) biobanking stakeholders who were either involved with the collection or the utilization of biosamples to assess the scope of their biobanking activities and their interest in virtual biobanking or cooperating in the formation of the UC-wide biorepository. Materials and Methods: Each institutional review board from the five UC medical campuses' provided a dataset of potential researchers involved with biobanking. Once identified, a brief six item web-based questionnaire was administered electronically to these researchers. Results: Most survey participants (80{\%}) responded {"}yes{"} (n = 348) that they were actively collecting biosamples for research, and 68{\%} of participants indicated they would either definitely (30{\%}, n = 131) or maybe (38{\%}, n = 166) request biosample materials now or within the next year. An equal proportion of participants responded yes (42{\%} or n = 184) and maybe (42{\%} or n = 182) when asked if they would voluntarily contribute specimens to a UC-wide virtual biobank. Discussion: The results presented above show high levels of support among UC biobanking stakeholders for both requesting material from and contributing material to a UC-wide virtual biobank. In addition, a considerable number of individual researchers on our five UC medical campuses are conducting biospecimen research (i.e., well over n = 435 respondents).",
keywords = "Biobank, biosamples, perceptions, stakeholder, virtual",
author = "{Van Draanen}, Jenna and Pamela Davidson and Helene Bour-Jordan and Bowman-Carpio, {Lee Anna} and David Boyle and Steve Dubinett and Brian Gardner and Jachael Gardner and Courtney McFall and Dan Mercola and Terry Nakazono and Stephanie Soares and Hubert Stoppler and Margaret Tempero and Scott Vandenberg and Wan, {Yu-Jui Yvonne} and Sarah Dry",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/bio.2016.0009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "203--210",
journal = "Biopreservation and Biobanking",
issn = "1947-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank

AU - Van Draanen, Jenna

AU - Davidson, Pamela

AU - Bour-Jordan, Helene

AU - Bowman-Carpio, Lee Anna

AU - Boyle, David

AU - Dubinett, Steve

AU - Gardner, Brian

AU - Gardner, Jachael

AU - McFall, Courtney

AU - Mercola, Dan

AU - Nakazono, Terry

AU - Soares, Stephanie

AU - Stoppler, Hubert

AU - Tempero, Margaret

AU - Vandenberg, Scott

AU - Wan, Yu-Jui Yvonne

AU - Dry, Sarah

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Biosamples and associated clinical data accelerate translational and clinical research discoveries. A lack of high quality biosamples both stalls projects and limits research advances. In this study, we targeted a wide audience of University of California (UC) biobanking stakeholders who were either involved with the collection or the utilization of biosamples to assess the scope of their biobanking activities and their interest in virtual biobanking or cooperating in the formation of the UC-wide biorepository. Materials and Methods: Each institutional review board from the five UC medical campuses' provided a dataset of potential researchers involved with biobanking. Once identified, a brief six item web-based questionnaire was administered electronically to these researchers. Results: Most survey participants (80%) responded "yes" (n = 348) that they were actively collecting biosamples for research, and 68% of participants indicated they would either definitely (30%, n = 131) or maybe (38%, n = 166) request biosample materials now or within the next year. An equal proportion of participants responded yes (42% or n = 184) and maybe (42% or n = 182) when asked if they would voluntarily contribute specimens to a UC-wide virtual biobank. Discussion: The results presented above show high levels of support among UC biobanking stakeholders for both requesting material from and contributing material to a UC-wide virtual biobank. In addition, a considerable number of individual researchers on our five UC medical campuses are conducting biospecimen research (i.e., well over n = 435 respondents).

AB - Introduction: Biosamples and associated clinical data accelerate translational and clinical research discoveries. A lack of high quality biosamples both stalls projects and limits research advances. In this study, we targeted a wide audience of University of California (UC) biobanking stakeholders who were either involved with the collection or the utilization of biosamples to assess the scope of their biobanking activities and their interest in virtual biobanking or cooperating in the formation of the UC-wide biorepository. Materials and Methods: Each institutional review board from the five UC medical campuses' provided a dataset of potential researchers involved with biobanking. Once identified, a brief six item web-based questionnaire was administered electronically to these researchers. Results: Most survey participants (80%) responded "yes" (n = 348) that they were actively collecting biosamples for research, and 68% of participants indicated they would either definitely (30%, n = 131) or maybe (38%, n = 166) request biosample materials now or within the next year. An equal proportion of participants responded yes (42% or n = 184) and maybe (42% or n = 182) when asked if they would voluntarily contribute specimens to a UC-wide virtual biobank. Discussion: The results presented above show high levels of support among UC biobanking stakeholders for both requesting material from and contributing material to a UC-wide virtual biobank. In addition, a considerable number of individual researchers on our five UC medical campuses are conducting biospecimen research (i.e., well over n = 435 respondents).

KW - Biobank

KW - biosamples

KW - perceptions

KW - stakeholder

KW - virtual

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020203344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020203344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/bio.2016.0009

DO - 10.1089/bio.2016.0009

M3 - Article

C2 - 27929677

AN - SCOPUS:85020203344

VL - 15

SP - 203

EP - 210

JO - Biopreservation and Biobanking

JF - Biopreservation and Biobanking

SN - 1947-5535

IS - 3

ER -