Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers

Timothy J. Walker, Betsy Risendal, Michelle C. Kegler, Daniela B. Friedman, Bryan J. Weiner, Rebecca S. Williams, Shin-Ping Tu, Maria E. Fernandez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple evidence-based approaches (EBAs) exist to improve colorectal cancer screening in health clinics. The success of these approaches is tied to effective implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of EBAs for colorectal cancer screening and clinic-level correlates of implementation in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using data collected from FQHC clinics across seven states (n = 51). A clinic representative completed electronic surveys about clinic characteristics (e.g., size, patient characteristics, and medical record system characteristics) and the implementation of Community Guide recommended EBAs (e.g., client reminders, small media, and provider assessment and feedback). We used bivariate Spearman correlations to assess clinic-level correlates with implementation outcomes. Most clinics were planning to implement, in the early implementation stages, or inconsistently implementing EBAs. No EBA was fully implemented by more than nine (17.6%) clinics. Clinic size variables were inversely related to implementation levels of one-on-one education; medical record variables were directly related to implementation levels of client and provider reminders as well as provider assessment and feedback; and rapid and timely feedback from clinic leaders was directly associated with implementation levels of four out of six EBAs. Given the varying levels of implementation, clinics need to assess current use of implementation strategies and improve effective program delivery to increase colorectal cancer screening among their patients. In addition, clinics should also consider how their characteristics may support or serve as a barrier to implementation in their respective settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Education and Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Cross-Sectional Studies
Medical Records
Health
Education
Screening
Clinic
Health Centers
Cancer

Keywords

  • cancer prevention and screening
  • colorectal cancer
  • community health centers
  • evidence-based-approaches
  • implementation and dissemination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening : A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers. / Walker, Timothy J.; Risendal, Betsy; Kegler, Michelle C.; Friedman, Daniela B.; Weiner, Bryan J.; Williams, Rebecca S.; Tu, Shin-Ping; Fernandez, Maria E.

In: Health Education and Behavior, 01.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walker, Timothy J. ; Risendal, Betsy ; Kegler, Michelle C. ; Friedman, Daniela B. ; Weiner, Bryan J. ; Williams, Rebecca S. ; Tu, Shin-Ping ; Fernandez, Maria E. / Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening : A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers. In: Health Education and Behavior. 2018.
@article{54650dd26563430bb7b6672c35afb16c,
title = "Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers",
abstract = "Multiple evidence-based approaches (EBAs) exist to improve colorectal cancer screening in health clinics. The success of these approaches is tied to effective implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of EBAs for colorectal cancer screening and clinic-level correlates of implementation in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using data collected from FQHC clinics across seven states (n = 51). A clinic representative completed electronic surveys about clinic characteristics (e.g., size, patient characteristics, and medical record system characteristics) and the implementation of Community Guide recommended EBAs (e.g., client reminders, small media, and provider assessment and feedback). We used bivariate Spearman correlations to assess clinic-level correlates with implementation outcomes. Most clinics were planning to implement, in the early implementation stages, or inconsistently implementing EBAs. No EBA was fully implemented by more than nine (17.6{\%}) clinics. Clinic size variables were inversely related to implementation levels of one-on-one education; medical record variables were directly related to implementation levels of client and provider reminders as well as provider assessment and feedback; and rapid and timely feedback from clinic leaders was directly associated with implementation levels of four out of six EBAs. Given the varying levels of implementation, clinics need to assess current use of implementation strategies and improve effective program delivery to increase colorectal cancer screening among their patients. In addition, clinics should also consider how their characteristics may support or serve as a barrier to implementation in their respective settings.",
keywords = "cancer prevention and screening, colorectal cancer, community health centers, evidence-based-approaches, implementation and dissemination",
author = "Walker, {Timothy J.} and Betsy Risendal and Kegler, {Michelle C.} and Friedman, {Daniela B.} and Weiner, {Bryan J.} and Williams, {Rebecca S.} and Shin-Ping Tu and Fernandez, {Maria E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1090198118778333",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education",
issn = "1090-1981",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening

T2 - A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers

AU - Walker, Timothy J.

AU - Risendal, Betsy

AU - Kegler, Michelle C.

AU - Friedman, Daniela B.

AU - Weiner, Bryan J.

AU - Williams, Rebecca S.

AU - Tu, Shin-Ping

AU - Fernandez, Maria E.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Multiple evidence-based approaches (EBAs) exist to improve colorectal cancer screening in health clinics. The success of these approaches is tied to effective implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of EBAs for colorectal cancer screening and clinic-level correlates of implementation in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using data collected from FQHC clinics across seven states (n = 51). A clinic representative completed electronic surveys about clinic characteristics (e.g., size, patient characteristics, and medical record system characteristics) and the implementation of Community Guide recommended EBAs (e.g., client reminders, small media, and provider assessment and feedback). We used bivariate Spearman correlations to assess clinic-level correlates with implementation outcomes. Most clinics were planning to implement, in the early implementation stages, or inconsistently implementing EBAs. No EBA was fully implemented by more than nine (17.6%) clinics. Clinic size variables were inversely related to implementation levels of one-on-one education; medical record variables were directly related to implementation levels of client and provider reminders as well as provider assessment and feedback; and rapid and timely feedback from clinic leaders was directly associated with implementation levels of four out of six EBAs. Given the varying levels of implementation, clinics need to assess current use of implementation strategies and improve effective program delivery to increase colorectal cancer screening among their patients. In addition, clinics should also consider how their characteristics may support or serve as a barrier to implementation in their respective settings.

AB - Multiple evidence-based approaches (EBAs) exist to improve colorectal cancer screening in health clinics. The success of these approaches is tied to effective implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of EBAs for colorectal cancer screening and clinic-level correlates of implementation in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using data collected from FQHC clinics across seven states (n = 51). A clinic representative completed electronic surveys about clinic characteristics (e.g., size, patient characteristics, and medical record system characteristics) and the implementation of Community Guide recommended EBAs (e.g., client reminders, small media, and provider assessment and feedback). We used bivariate Spearman correlations to assess clinic-level correlates with implementation outcomes. Most clinics were planning to implement, in the early implementation stages, or inconsistently implementing EBAs. No EBA was fully implemented by more than nine (17.6%) clinics. Clinic size variables were inversely related to implementation levels of one-on-one education; medical record variables were directly related to implementation levels of client and provider reminders as well as provider assessment and feedback; and rapid and timely feedback from clinic leaders was directly associated with implementation levels of four out of six EBAs. Given the varying levels of implementation, clinics need to assess current use of implementation strategies and improve effective program delivery to increase colorectal cancer screening among their patients. In addition, clinics should also consider how their characteristics may support or serve as a barrier to implementation in their respective settings.

KW - cancer prevention and screening

KW - colorectal cancer

KW - community health centers

KW - evidence-based-approaches

KW - implementation and dissemination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049913465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049913465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1090198118778333

DO - 10.1177/1090198118778333

M3 - Article

C2 - 29991294

AN - SCOPUS:85049913465

JO - Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education

JF - Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education

SN - 1090-1981

ER -