Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface: A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep

Deana L. Clifford, Brant A. Schumaker, Thomas R. Stephenson, Vernon C. Bleich, Maya L. Cahn, Ben J. Gonzales, Walter M Boyce, Jonna A Mazet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite evidence that domestic sheep diseases threaten the persistence of bighorn sheep populations, the economic consequences of restricting domestic sheep grazing has polarized the debate, with some arguing that disease risk posed by domestic sheep has been exaggerated and grazing restrictions should be eased. We constructed a model to assess how different management strategies (grazing allotment closures, grazing time reductions, and reduced probability of stray domestic sheep) affect the risk of respiratory disease transmission from domestic sheep to endangered Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep, and to predict population-level impacts of an outbreak. Even when management strategies reduced risk of interspecies contact to less than 2% per year, our model predicted a 50% probability of a catastrophic respiratory disease outbreak during the next 10 bighorn sheep generations. If an outbreak occurs in the near future, the model predicts that the smallest Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep population would have a 33% probability of quasi-extinction. To eliminate all risk of contact and potential disease transmission, domestic sheep cannot be grazed on allotments that overlap with areas utilized by Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Where wildlife and domestic animal populations share limited habitat, and there is documented evidence of a substantial disease threat and extinction risk, stakeholders must recognize that the only way to eliminate contact and risk of disease transmission is to give priority to one species or the other. If conservation is the priority, difficult decisions will need to be made to balance trade-offs between economic livelihoods and species conservation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2559-2568
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume142
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Ovis canadensis
sheep
livestock
wildlife
disease transmission
grazing
respiratory tract diseases
extinction
trade balance
sheep diseases
respiratory disease
economics
livelihood
domestic animals
stakeholders
extinction risk
species conservation
habitats
stakeholder
persistence

Keywords

  • Domestic sheep
  • Modeling
  • Ovis aries
  • Ovis canadensis sierrae
  • Pasteurella
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Clifford, D. L., Schumaker, B. A., Stephenson, T. R., Bleich, V. C., Cahn, M. L., Gonzales, B. J., ... Mazet, J. A. (2009). Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface: A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Biological Conservation, 142(11), 2559-2568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.001

Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface : A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. / Clifford, Deana L.; Schumaker, Brant A.; Stephenson, Thomas R.; Bleich, Vernon C.; Cahn, Maya L.; Gonzales, Ben J.; Boyce, Walter M; Mazet, Jonna A.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 142, No. 11, 11.2009, p. 2559-2568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clifford DL, Schumaker BA, Stephenson TR, Bleich VC, Cahn ML, Gonzales BJ et al. Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface: A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Biological Conservation. 2009 Nov;142(11):2559-2568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.001
Clifford, Deana L. ; Schumaker, Brant A. ; Stephenson, Thomas R. ; Bleich, Vernon C. ; Cahn, Maya L. ; Gonzales, Ben J. ; Boyce, Walter M ; Mazet, Jonna A. / Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface : A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. In: Biological Conservation. 2009 ; Vol. 142, No. 11. pp. 2559-2568.
@article{c0bc888120624716941a90b58a09860d,
title = "Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface: A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep",
abstract = "Despite evidence that domestic sheep diseases threaten the persistence of bighorn sheep populations, the economic consequences of restricting domestic sheep grazing has polarized the debate, with some arguing that disease risk posed by domestic sheep has been exaggerated and grazing restrictions should be eased. We constructed a model to assess how different management strategies (grazing allotment closures, grazing time reductions, and reduced probability of stray domestic sheep) affect the risk of respiratory disease transmission from domestic sheep to endangered Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep, and to predict population-level impacts of an outbreak. Even when management strategies reduced risk of interspecies contact to less than 2{\%} per year, our model predicted a 50{\%} probability of a catastrophic respiratory disease outbreak during the next 10 bighorn sheep generations. If an outbreak occurs in the near future, the model predicts that the smallest Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep population would have a 33{\%} probability of quasi-extinction. To eliminate all risk of contact and potential disease transmission, domestic sheep cannot be grazed on allotments that overlap with areas utilized by Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Where wildlife and domestic animal populations share limited habitat, and there is documented evidence of a substantial disease threat and extinction risk, stakeholders must recognize that the only way to eliminate contact and risk of disease transmission is to give priority to one species or the other. If conservation is the priority, difficult decisions will need to be made to balance trade-offs between economic livelihoods and species conservation.",
keywords = "Domestic sheep, Modeling, Ovis aries, Ovis canadensis sierrae, Pasteurella, Risk assessment",
author = "Clifford, {Deana L.} and Schumaker, {Brant A.} and Stephenson, {Thomas R.} and Bleich, {Vernon C.} and Cahn, {Maya L.} and Gonzales, {Ben J.} and Boyce, {Walter M} and Mazet, {Jonna A}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "2559--2568",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface

T2 - A study of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep

AU - Clifford, Deana L.

AU - Schumaker, Brant A.

AU - Stephenson, Thomas R.

AU - Bleich, Vernon C.

AU - Cahn, Maya L.

AU - Gonzales, Ben J.

AU - Boyce, Walter M

AU - Mazet, Jonna A

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Despite evidence that domestic sheep diseases threaten the persistence of bighorn sheep populations, the economic consequences of restricting domestic sheep grazing has polarized the debate, with some arguing that disease risk posed by domestic sheep has been exaggerated and grazing restrictions should be eased. We constructed a model to assess how different management strategies (grazing allotment closures, grazing time reductions, and reduced probability of stray domestic sheep) affect the risk of respiratory disease transmission from domestic sheep to endangered Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep, and to predict population-level impacts of an outbreak. Even when management strategies reduced risk of interspecies contact to less than 2% per year, our model predicted a 50% probability of a catastrophic respiratory disease outbreak during the next 10 bighorn sheep generations. If an outbreak occurs in the near future, the model predicts that the smallest Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep population would have a 33% probability of quasi-extinction. To eliminate all risk of contact and potential disease transmission, domestic sheep cannot be grazed on allotments that overlap with areas utilized by Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Where wildlife and domestic animal populations share limited habitat, and there is documented evidence of a substantial disease threat and extinction risk, stakeholders must recognize that the only way to eliminate contact and risk of disease transmission is to give priority to one species or the other. If conservation is the priority, difficult decisions will need to be made to balance trade-offs between economic livelihoods and species conservation.

AB - Despite evidence that domestic sheep diseases threaten the persistence of bighorn sheep populations, the economic consequences of restricting domestic sheep grazing has polarized the debate, with some arguing that disease risk posed by domestic sheep has been exaggerated and grazing restrictions should be eased. We constructed a model to assess how different management strategies (grazing allotment closures, grazing time reductions, and reduced probability of stray domestic sheep) affect the risk of respiratory disease transmission from domestic sheep to endangered Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep, and to predict population-level impacts of an outbreak. Even when management strategies reduced risk of interspecies contact to less than 2% per year, our model predicted a 50% probability of a catastrophic respiratory disease outbreak during the next 10 bighorn sheep generations. If an outbreak occurs in the near future, the model predicts that the smallest Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep population would have a 33% probability of quasi-extinction. To eliminate all risk of contact and potential disease transmission, domestic sheep cannot be grazed on allotments that overlap with areas utilized by Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. Where wildlife and domestic animal populations share limited habitat, and there is documented evidence of a substantial disease threat and extinction risk, stakeholders must recognize that the only way to eliminate contact and risk of disease transmission is to give priority to one species or the other. If conservation is the priority, difficult decisions will need to be made to balance trade-offs between economic livelihoods and species conservation.

KW - Domestic sheep

KW - Modeling

KW - Ovis aries

KW - Ovis canadensis sierrae

KW - Pasteurella

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249203491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249203491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:69249203491

VL - 142

SP - 2559

EP - 2568

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 11

ER -