Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men

R. Corey O'Connor, Dana K. Nanigian, Bhavin N. Patel, Michael L. Guralnick, Lars M. Ellision, Anthony R Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for the treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in patients aged 75 years or older at surgery. Methods: From September 1987 through June 2005, 33 men aged 75 years or older underwent AUS insertion for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Through retrospective chart review and personal/family interview, the patients' outcomes with regard to continence, complications, and the need to deactivate the AUS for medical or social reasons were determined. Results: Four patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. The mean patient age was 77.6 years (range 75 to 83). The average follow-up was 5.0 years (range 1 to 11). After AUS insertion, the mean pad use improved from 6.7 (range 3 to 10) to 0.8 (range 0 to 2) per day. Overall, 16 (55%) of 29 men reported no complications. AUS revision was necessary in 4 men (14%), and sphincter removal in 4 (14%). Six men (21%) required deactivation of the implant because of poor overall health an average of 47 months after placement. The "success" rate improved to 72% (21 of 29 men) when cuff deactivation without revision or removal was not considered a complication. Conclusions: In our study, elderly men did well after AUS placement for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. The procedure should not be withheld solely on the basis of the age of the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-128
Number of pages3
JournalUrology
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Artificial Urinary Sphincter
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Lost to Follow-Up
Interviews
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

O'Connor, R. C., Nanigian, D. K., Patel, B. N., Guralnick, M. L., Ellision, L. M., & Stone, A. R. (2007). Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men. Urology, 69(1), 126-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.021

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men. / O'Connor, R. Corey; Nanigian, Dana K.; Patel, Bhavin N.; Guralnick, Michael L.; Ellision, Lars M.; Stone, Anthony R.

In: Urology, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 126-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Connor, RC, Nanigian, DK, Patel, BN, Guralnick, ML, Ellision, LM & Stone, AR 2007, 'Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men', Urology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 126-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.021
O'Connor RC, Nanigian DK, Patel BN, Guralnick ML, Ellision LM, Stone AR. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men. Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):126-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.021
O'Connor, R. Corey ; Nanigian, Dana K. ; Patel, Bhavin N. ; Guralnick, Michael L. ; Ellision, Lars M. ; Stone, Anthony R. / Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men. In: Urology. 2007 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 126-128.
@article{624a82dc9e9648b7b2f665fab86cbae4,
title = "Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for the treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in patients aged 75 years or older at surgery. Methods: From September 1987 through June 2005, 33 men aged 75 years or older underwent AUS insertion for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Through retrospective chart review and personal/family interview, the patients' outcomes with regard to continence, complications, and the need to deactivate the AUS for medical or social reasons were determined. Results: Four patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. The mean patient age was 77.6 years (range 75 to 83). The average follow-up was 5.0 years (range 1 to 11). After AUS insertion, the mean pad use improved from 6.7 (range 3 to 10) to 0.8 (range 0 to 2) per day. Overall, 16 (55{\%}) of 29 men reported no complications. AUS revision was necessary in 4 men (14{\%}), and sphincter removal in 4 (14{\%}). Six men (21{\%}) required deactivation of the implant because of poor overall health an average of 47 months after placement. The {"}success{"} rate improved to 72{\%} (21 of 29 men) when cuff deactivation without revision or removal was not considered a complication. Conclusions: In our study, elderly men did well after AUS placement for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. The procedure should not be withheld solely on the basis of the age of the patient.",
author = "O'Connor, {R. Corey} and Nanigian, {Dana K.} and Patel, {Bhavin N.} and Guralnick, {Michael L.} and Ellision, {Lars M.} and Stone, {Anthony R}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "126--128",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "1527-9995",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men

AU - O'Connor, R. Corey

AU - Nanigian, Dana K.

AU - Patel, Bhavin N.

AU - Guralnick, Michael L.

AU - Ellision, Lars M.

AU - Stone, Anthony R

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for the treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in patients aged 75 years or older at surgery. Methods: From September 1987 through June 2005, 33 men aged 75 years or older underwent AUS insertion for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Through retrospective chart review and personal/family interview, the patients' outcomes with regard to continence, complications, and the need to deactivate the AUS for medical or social reasons were determined. Results: Four patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. The mean patient age was 77.6 years (range 75 to 83). The average follow-up was 5.0 years (range 1 to 11). After AUS insertion, the mean pad use improved from 6.7 (range 3 to 10) to 0.8 (range 0 to 2) per day. Overall, 16 (55%) of 29 men reported no complications. AUS revision was necessary in 4 men (14%), and sphincter removal in 4 (14%). Six men (21%) required deactivation of the implant because of poor overall health an average of 47 months after placement. The "success" rate improved to 72% (21 of 29 men) when cuff deactivation without revision or removal was not considered a complication. Conclusions: In our study, elderly men did well after AUS placement for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. The procedure should not be withheld solely on the basis of the age of the patient.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for the treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in patients aged 75 years or older at surgery. Methods: From September 1987 through June 2005, 33 men aged 75 years or older underwent AUS insertion for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Through retrospective chart review and personal/family interview, the patients' outcomes with regard to continence, complications, and the need to deactivate the AUS for medical or social reasons were determined. Results: Four patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. The mean patient age was 77.6 years (range 75 to 83). The average follow-up was 5.0 years (range 1 to 11). After AUS insertion, the mean pad use improved from 6.7 (range 3 to 10) to 0.8 (range 0 to 2) per day. Overall, 16 (55%) of 29 men reported no complications. AUS revision was necessary in 4 men (14%), and sphincter removal in 4 (14%). Six men (21%) required deactivation of the implant because of poor overall health an average of 47 months after placement. The "success" rate improved to 72% (21 of 29 men) when cuff deactivation without revision or removal was not considered a complication. Conclusions: In our study, elderly men did well after AUS placement for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. The procedure should not be withheld solely on the basis of the age of the patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846539682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846539682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.021

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.021

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 126

EP - 128

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 1527-9995

IS - 1

ER -