Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries.

J. R. Raskind, Richard A Marder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries has become a common treatment method. A comparative study was undertaken to compare this method with open joint debridement. Fourteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fourteen patients) were treated by arthroscopic examination and debridement and were compared to sixteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fifteen patients) treated by open debridement. There were no resultant infections or operative complications in either group. Of note, the arthroscopic debridement group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay [mean of 1.6 days compared to a mean of 2.6 days in the open debridement group (p < 0.02)], a significant incidence of additional intra-articular injuries detected (p < 0.01), less postoperative pain, and a superior cosmetic result. We conclude that arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries is a safe and effective method of treatment, providing additional diagnostic information while minimizing morbidity and reducing hospital stay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Iowa orthopaedic journal
Pages121-123
Number of pages3
Volume13
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Knee Injuries
Debridement
Knee Joint
Length of Stay
Joints
Postoperative Pain
Cosmetics
Morbidity
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Raskind, J. R., & Marder, R. A. (1993). Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries. In The Iowa orthopaedic journal (Vol. 13, pp. 121-123)

Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries. / Raskind, J. R.; Marder, Richard A.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal. Vol. 13 1993. p. 121-123.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Raskind, JR & Marder, RA 1993, Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries. in The Iowa orthopaedic journal. vol. 13, pp. 121-123.
Raskind JR, Marder RA. Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries. In The Iowa orthopaedic journal. Vol. 13. 1993. p. 121-123
Raskind, J. R. ; Marder, Richard A. / Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries. The Iowa orthopaedic journal. Vol. 13 1993. pp. 121-123
@inbook{31a6b9ef1e9541abb49a3dba2267a362,
title = "Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries.",
abstract = "Arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries has become a common treatment method. A comparative study was undertaken to compare this method with open joint debridement. Fourteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fourteen patients) were treated by arthroscopic examination and debridement and were compared to sixteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fifteen patients) treated by open debridement. There were no resultant infections or operative complications in either group. Of note, the arthroscopic debridement group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay [mean of 1.6 days compared to a mean of 2.6 days in the open debridement group (p < 0.02)], a significant incidence of additional intra-articular injuries detected (p < 0.01), less postoperative pain, and a superior cosmetic result. We conclude that arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries is a safe and effective method of treatment, providing additional diagnostic information while minimizing morbidity and reducing hospital stay.",
author = "Raskind, {J. R.} and Marder, {Richard A}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "121--123",
booktitle = "The Iowa orthopaedic journal",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Arthroscopic versus open debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries.

AU - Raskind, J. R.

AU - Marder, Richard A

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries has become a common treatment method. A comparative study was undertaken to compare this method with open joint debridement. Fourteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fourteen patients) were treated by arthroscopic examination and debridement and were compared to sixteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fifteen patients) treated by open debridement. There were no resultant infections or operative complications in either group. Of note, the arthroscopic debridement group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay [mean of 1.6 days compared to a mean of 2.6 days in the open debridement group (p < 0.02)], a significant incidence of additional intra-articular injuries detected (p < 0.01), less postoperative pain, and a superior cosmetic result. We conclude that arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries is a safe and effective method of treatment, providing additional diagnostic information while minimizing morbidity and reducing hospital stay.

AB - Arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries has become a common treatment method. A comparative study was undertaken to compare this method with open joint debridement. Fourteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fourteen patients) were treated by arthroscopic examination and debridement and were compared to sixteen penetrating knee joint injuries (fifteen patients) treated by open debridement. There were no resultant infections or operative complications in either group. Of note, the arthroscopic debridement group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay [mean of 1.6 days compared to a mean of 2.6 days in the open debridement group (p < 0.02)], a significant incidence of additional intra-articular injuries detected (p < 0.01), less postoperative pain, and a superior cosmetic result. We conclude that arthroscopic debridement of penetrating knee joint injuries is a safe and effective method of treatment, providing additional diagnostic information while minimizing morbidity and reducing hospital stay.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027901399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027901399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

C2 - 7820732

AN - SCOPUS:0027901399

VL - 13

SP - 121

EP - 123

BT - The Iowa orthopaedic journal

ER -