Abstract
Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were "normal goods" for below-average income, but "inferior goods" for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were "normal" for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 307-315 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Population Health Management |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2011 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
- Leadership and Management
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Cite this
Are meals at full-service and fast-food restaurants "normal" or "inferior"? / Kim, Daehwan; Leigh, J Paul.
In: Population Health Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 307-315.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Are meals at full-service and fast-food restaurants "normal" or "inferior"?
AU - Kim, Daehwan
AU - Leigh, J Paul
PY - 2011/12/1
Y1 - 2011/12/1
N2 - Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were "normal goods" for below-average income, but "inferior goods" for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were "normal" for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.
AB - Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were "normal goods" for below-average income, but "inferior goods" for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were "normal" for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83455246025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83455246025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/pop.2010.0071
DO - 10.1089/pop.2010.0071
M3 - Article
C2 - 21827320
AN - SCOPUS:83455246025
VL - 14
SP - 307
EP - 315
JO - Population Health Management
JF - Population Health Management
SN - 1942-7891
IS - 6
ER -