Are meals at full-service and fast-food restaurants "normal" or "inferior"?

Daehwan Kim, J Paul Leigh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were "normal goods" for below-average income, but "inferior goods" for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were "normal" for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-315
Number of pages9
JournalPopulation Health Management
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Fast Foods
Restaurants
Meals
Poverty
Health Surveys
Life Style
Obesity
Eating
Economics
Diet
Food

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Leadership and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Are meals at full-service and fast-food restaurants "normal" or "inferior"? / Kim, Daehwan; Leigh, J Paul.

In: Population Health Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 307-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b51ac2feb674e86965d96257de38958,
title = "Are meals at full-service and fast-food restaurants {"}normal{"} or {"}inferior{"}?",
abstract = "Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were {"}normal goods{"} for below-average income, but {"}inferior goods{"} for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were {"}normal{"} for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.",
author = "Daehwan Kim and Leigh, {J Paul}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/pop.2010.0071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "307--315",
journal = "Population Health Management",
issn = "1942-7891",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are meals at full-service and fast-food restaurants "normal" or "inferior"?

AU - Kim, Daehwan

AU - Leigh, J Paul

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were "normal goods" for below-average income, but "inferior goods" for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were "normal" for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.

AB - Whereas some studies show statistically significant linear associations between consumption at full-service restaurants and consumer incomes, studies of fast-food restaurants fail to find statistically significant linear associations. In this study, nationally representative data were drawn from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the accompanying Diet and Health Knowledge Survey. The sample contained 4972 individuals who were 21 years of age or older. Dependent variables measured number of restaurant visits on 2 nonconsecutive days. Income was total annual household income. Control variables reflected sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and attitudinal variables. To capture possible curvilinear relationships between income and food consumption, we analyzed frequency distributions, regressions on full samples including income squared, and we divided samples into above-and below-average income groups. Zero-inflated negative binomial regressions accounted for excessive zeros within dependent variables. We found that fast-food restaurants were "normal goods" for below-average income, but "inferior goods" for above-average income, whereas full-service restaurants were "normal" for virtually all income levels. Earlier studies were flawed because they only tested for linear associations. Our results have implications for the poverty and obesity debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83455246025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83455246025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/pop.2010.0071

DO - 10.1089/pop.2010.0071

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 307

EP - 315

JO - Population Health Management

JF - Population Health Management

SN - 1942-7891

IS - 6

ER -