Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma

B. W. Case, J. L. Abraham, G. Meeker, F. D. Pooley, Kent E Pinkerton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although asbestos research has been ongoing for decades, this increased knowledge has not led to consensus in many areas of the field. Two such areas of controversy include the specific definitions of asbestos, and limitations in understanding exposure-response relationships for various asbestos types and exposure levels and disease. This document reviews the current regulatory and mineralogical definitions and how variability in these definitions has led to difficulties in the discussion and comparison of both experimental laboratory and human epidemiological studies for asbestos. This review also examines the issues of exposure measurement in both animal and human studies, and discusses the impact of these issues on determination of cause for asbestos-related diseases. Limitations include the lack of detailed characterization and limited quantification of the fibers in most studies. Associated data gaps and research needs are also enumerated in this review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-39
Number of pages37
JournalJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews
Volume14
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Asbestos
Health Status
Health
Research
Epidemiologic Studies
Animals
Malignant Mesothelioma
Fibers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Toxicology

Cite this

@article{5d68740f942e41bf8ab51711d4b508ff,
title = "Applying definitions of {"}asbestos{"} to environmental and {"}low-dose{"} exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma",
abstract = "Although asbestos research has been ongoing for decades, this increased knowledge has not led to consensus in many areas of the field. Two such areas of controversy include the specific definitions of asbestos, and limitations in understanding exposure-response relationships for various asbestos types and exposure levels and disease. This document reviews the current regulatory and mineralogical definitions and how variability in these definitions has led to difficulties in the discussion and comparison of both experimental laboratory and human epidemiological studies for asbestos. This review also examines the issues of exposure measurement in both animal and human studies, and discusses the impact of these issues on determination of cause for asbestos-related diseases. Limitations include the lack of detailed characterization and limited quantification of the fibers in most studies. Associated data gaps and research needs are also enumerated in this review.",
author = "Case, {B. W.} and Abraham, {J. L.} and G. Meeker and Pooley, {F. D.} and Pinkerton, {Kent E}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/10937404.2011.556045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "3--39",
journal = "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews",
issn = "1093-7404",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma

AU - Case, B. W.

AU - Abraham, J. L.

AU - Meeker, G.

AU - Pooley, F. D.

AU - Pinkerton, Kent E

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Although asbestos research has been ongoing for decades, this increased knowledge has not led to consensus in many areas of the field. Two such areas of controversy include the specific definitions of asbestos, and limitations in understanding exposure-response relationships for various asbestos types and exposure levels and disease. This document reviews the current regulatory and mineralogical definitions and how variability in these definitions has led to difficulties in the discussion and comparison of both experimental laboratory and human epidemiological studies for asbestos. This review also examines the issues of exposure measurement in both animal and human studies, and discusses the impact of these issues on determination of cause for asbestos-related diseases. Limitations include the lack of detailed characterization and limited quantification of the fibers in most studies. Associated data gaps and research needs are also enumerated in this review.

AB - Although asbestos research has been ongoing for decades, this increased knowledge has not led to consensus in many areas of the field. Two such areas of controversy include the specific definitions of asbestos, and limitations in understanding exposure-response relationships for various asbestos types and exposure levels and disease. This document reviews the current regulatory and mineralogical definitions and how variability in these definitions has led to difficulties in the discussion and comparison of both experimental laboratory and human epidemiological studies for asbestos. This review also examines the issues of exposure measurement in both animal and human studies, and discusses the impact of these issues on determination of cause for asbestos-related diseases. Limitations include the lack of detailed characterization and limited quantification of the fibers in most studies. Associated data gaps and research needs are also enumerated in this review.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959226692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959226692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10937404.2011.556045

DO - 10.1080/10937404.2011.556045

M3 - Article

C2 - 21534084

AN - SCOPUS:79959226692

VL - 14

SP - 3

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews

JF - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part B: Critical Reviews

SN - 1093-7404

IS - 1-4

ER -